1. thanks haha, the praise means a lot from a fine artist such as yourself!
2. eh on the weekdays i would be really bored so i would kinda just churn them out, they dont really take me very long seeing as theyre nothing fancy (i use MS paint lawlz nuff said), and they were quite fun to make!
3. maaaybee....but probably not. im very flighty, so who knows when i'll become active again! it could always happen someday soon though, so cross your fingers my child ;)
okay, so i looked back over it and ive decided that since that was the first check on the huntail analysis, it isn't too big of a deal. i'll gp it (or another member, it doesnt matter too much) after the OP implements the changes on the check i stamped. that way i can iron out any complications that arose from the check. it was a good check imo, but there were just a few things wrong with it. i dont like to be stingy with gp stamps for amateur checks though, and as long as another gper looks over it later, i dont think it's a big deal.
it's okay. i didn't really look at the check too in-depth. i read a few paragraphs in the other check (the one that i stamped) and it seemed to be pretty good. i didn't read it too in-depth though, and that's my fault. i'll go look over it again and re-evaluate my decision. thanks for bringing this to my attention!
Thanks for the Rotom-C check! Will implement in 12+ h (midnight now).
eh, why did you stamp on Huntail? I would actually veto it >.> content-wise, some parts are not up to it. A ton of pokegrammar errors and formatting errors in a glance :d even the set itself is wrong :/it's not worth a 1/2 I think. The overview... Was not really an overview.... :x
eh, sorry I'm not directing this at you :d just wanted to clarify that check...