One concern though, that I have for the OU Viability thread.
The definitions really need some cleaning, polishing and fine-tuning. They end up becoming too vague and honestly they fail to really differentiate the superiority of one Rank to another. The Garchomp argument can be seen as an example.
If you need help or are too busy, I'd be more than happy to lend a hand in changing the definitions.
However if you feel they should stay the way they are (it is your thread), than that's fine too
Question: Does the tournament scene really have such a large impact when it comes to ranking? There could be many threats that just do not see the tournament scene too often that are worthy of A-Rank. Just a IMO and a question haha
Thank you PK for the update :] I know you're busy but it's good to know that you still intend to keep that thread alive haha
Cheers for keepin' Dragonite A-Rank.
Regarding Gyarados-Is there still a chance to raise it? Or is it not possible considering the current metagame...
*PS: I'm actually really interested in Crustle. Have you used it?
It definitely lacks the strength of a +2 Lucario. But thanks to Agility, with the help of Hazards (usually SR and a layer is optimal), Lucario at +2 Spe, can really abuse his coverage with Close Combat, Crunch, and Ice Punch. Even without an SD, with Max investments, LO, and an Adamant Nature, Lucario can KO so many threats. Of course Lucario still has its evident flaws mainly Bronzong,Skarmory, Slowbro, Hippowdon, Jellicent, and Techniloom but it really fits in well with this meta.
...And that's all I have to say haha.
Thanks for considering it :D