Conversation Between danmantincan and TheWolfe
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 14
-
-
-
-
Did you mean my battle again Wanderer? :P Sure thing.
-
I need your mons for your battle with eternal drifter
-
I reffed that battle, and it was his Machamp that used Protect+Wide Guard. Therefore all attacks that were targeting Machamp were protected against. If Leethoof had targeted someone else, it would have gone through.
-
Actually, I got the idea from Engi's match against Leethoof where his Carracosta used Protect + Wide Guard to cover his entire team. But since you bring up the fact that Protect has 0 priority when using it to cover allies, that makes sense. I'll get my commands up later today. :]
-
Also, even if it were to be deemed "legal" protecting an ally has 0 Priority. So Wide Guard+Protect would only reach 3 priority for allies, meaning the Fake Out would be faster.
-
Well, basically as Orcinus said, it would be incredibly overpowered. If you can show me any example where Protect+Wide Guard protected an entire team I might consider changing it.
-
Oh! Sorry about that. I was wondering if Protect + Wide Guard would cover all of my team last round, which is why I put off orders until I could get this issued resolved. :o