Go Back   Smogon Community > danmantincan
Register FAQ Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Conversation Between danmantincan and TheWolfe
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 14
  1. TheWolfe
    Nov 17th, 2012 10:17:57 AM
    TheWolfe
  2. TheWolfe
    Nov 9th, 2012 6:36:31 PM
    TheWolfe
  3. danmantincan
  4. TheWolfe
    Nov 1st, 2012 10:19:36 PM
    TheWolfe
    Did you mean my battle again Wanderer? :P Sure thing.
  5. danmantincan
    Nov 1st, 2012 6:22:18 PM
    danmantincan
    I need your mons for your battle with eternal drifter
  6. danmantincan
    Oct 6th, 2012 1:09:58 PM
    danmantincan
    I reffed that battle, and it was his Machamp that used Protect+Wide Guard. Therefore all attacks that were targeting Machamp were protected against. If Leethoof had targeted someone else, it would have gone through.
  7. TheWolfe
    Oct 6th, 2012 12:41:33 PM
    TheWolfe
    Actually, I got the idea from Engi's match against Leethoof where his Carracosta used Protect + Wide Guard to cover his entire team. But since you bring up the fact that Protect has 0 priority when using it to cover allies, that makes sense. I'll get my commands up later today. :]
  8. danmantincan
    Oct 6th, 2012 12:15:39 PM
    danmantincan
    Also, even if it were to be deemed "legal" protecting an ally has 0 Priority. So Wide Guard+Protect would only reach 3 priority for allies, meaning the Fake Out would be faster.
  9. danmantincan
    Oct 6th, 2012 12:09:57 PM
    danmantincan
    Well, basically as Orcinus said, it would be incredibly overpowered. If you can show me any example where Protect+Wide Guard protected an entire team I might consider changing it.
  10. TheWolfe
    Oct 6th, 2012 11:34:48 AM
    TheWolfe
    Oh! Sorry about that. I was wondering if Protect + Wide Guard would cover all of my team last round, which is why I put off orders until I could get this issued resolved. :o

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 2:06:02 AM.