I think that would be a good idea. Are you trusting this guy to write this? It's not as if he has a lot of wording mistakes or something, almost everything he has wrote so far was wrong and he didn't even put the only viable set of Froslass. You know that i am not the guy that doesn't give chances to people, but making the analysis work out with this guy seems as a long shot to me. I guess we could tell him how to make the analyses acceptable and then see if he will manage to keep up?
I think that every Pokemon mentioned there should in need of a revamp, and the priority differs depnding on the importance of every Pokemon. From a quick look i can tell you that Ninjask is not in need of a revamp, but everything else seems fine. I would just put all those Pokemon in a mid and low priority list, as there isn't anything too important amongst them...