fissure was a TM in generation 2 and machamp could learn it, i don't want to see that shit happening.They were TMs in Generation II.
I think it's possible if GF change the TMs list for BW2 since TM is no longer trade-able.
@below, no...
Ice sucks because its resistant to the following range of types:I always believed SR is biggest reason why ice types suck, just look at the top 50 in usage, there's only two ice type pokemon: Mamoswine(which receives regular SR damage) and Cloyster(Shell Smash).
Like people have said, Black Kyurem might be good since it looks like it will be able to use electric attacks.
They haven't added TM's because previously you could trade them, thus bypassing compatibility. This gen is different because you can't trade TM's.We weren't only complaining about the Kyurem forms actually, we were just uselessly feeling bad about how bad the situation is for many Ice, Flying, Fire and Bug-types with SR around.
I didn't know the elemental punches were TMs....? Also, these moves are not gonna be available through TMs, they don't simply add TMs in one same generation. They may be distributed to more pokemon through move tutors though.
And oh yeah, NO STEALTH ROCK TM EVER AGAIN, PLEASE. That shit is already too spread out like this imo. Horrible move, SR, it changes the metagame too much for too many otherwise good pokes.
Yeah, no. That's a bad idea. Most Fighting-type checks are hit SE by either Rock or Ice. Lucario in particular would be problematic because things like Gliscor and Salamence would no longer be able to check it, even if it runs Crunch over Ice Punch, and it would be able to take out more fast Pokemon, such as Latias, due to the extra residual damage. Dusclops and Jellicent wouldn't mind the hazards too much, but they still don't like taking a boosted Shadow Ball or Crunch.To be honest I've always thought GF should make an ice type stealth rocks it would curb the power dragons if it were as wide spread as stealth rocks maybe they will do it in BW2.
Not getting into the SR is bad or good discussion, but why are people stating that if it wasn't for SR Dnite and Volcarona would be broken as a reason to show that it is good for the meta?They haven't added TM's because previously you could trade them, thus bypassing compatibility. This gen is different because you can't trade TM's.
Also, people need to stop complaining about Stealth Rock. Without it, Volcarona and Dragonite, among others, would be hell to fight compared to the Pokemon most of you want to be "good" (even though shit like Charizard still isn't as good as Infernape, Volcarona, etc).
Why does it matter that some Pokemon are used less? Some Pokemon are used less for a variety of reasons, not just Stealth Rock. If the Pokemon who are adversely affected by Stealth Rock are so good, then people would simply use Rapid Spinners to get rid of rocks... like they do with Dragonite / Volcarona. But they aren't very good, even without rocks, which is why people opt for other Pokemon. This isn't about what's bannable and what's not, it's about Pokemon who are viable in OU. Articuno, Charizard, stuff like that isn't top-tier anyway.Not getting into the SR is bad or good discussion, but why are people stating that if it wasn't for SR Dnite and Volcarona would be broken as a reason to show that it is good for the meta?
Well guess what if they were broken we would ban them... So problem solved. And maybe some pokes that were less used because of SR would see more usage. So why are you talking only about the things that would be broken without it? Why are you looking only at one side of the coin?
You are losing the point. You said before that SR is good because it keeps in check threats such as Rona and Dnite.Why does it matter that some Pokemon are used less? Some Pokemon are used less for a variety of reasons, not just Stealth Rock. If the Pokemon who are adversely affected by Stealth Rock are so good, then people would simply use Rapid Spinners to get rid of rocks... like they do with Dragonite / Volcarona. But they aren't very good, even without rocks, which is why people opt for other Pokemon. This isn't about what's bannable and what's not, it's about Pokemon who are viable in OU. Articuno, Charizard, stuff like that isn't top-tier anyway.
This logic that these Pokemon would be used more bothers me. Obviously putting a Pokemon in a situation where it has a better chance to compete will result in its usage increasing, but there are still better Pokemon already in use that perform their roles whether Stealth Rock is present or not.
Stealth Rock is good because it punishes switching. Punishing switching is important because it ensures the game will progress as Pokemon slowly get worn down to the point where a cleaner can come in and end it. Spikes were clearly insufficient in punishing switching, as seen by the sudden change in the metagame from Gen 2-3 to 4. Stealth Rock provided the necessary punishment that allowed for the significantly more dynamic game we see today.You are losing the point. You said before that SR is good because it keeps in check threats such as Rona and Dnite.
And i asked you how is this a reason to prove that SR is good for the meta.
Excadrill checked a multitude of threats such as Thundurus, Deoxys-S, Jolteon, Infernape, Terakion and more, but was deemed unhealthy for the meta and so it was banned. Every single poke that was banned brought some pros to the table of the OU meta, but they were all banned because their cons (they were broken) out weighted their pros (checking stuff).
So saying that SR is good because it checks some threats alone, is meaningless, if you don't make a mention to his cons also. Every single aspect in the pokemon game brings pros to the table, but to see if they are good in general we have to measure these goods in comparison with the negatives.
At the very least it would be nice to have a Rapid Spin move tutor. Hazards of all kinds are everywhere and meanwhile you've got like under a dozen spinnersWhy do people always complain about Stealth Rock exactly? Just run a freaking Rapid Spinner already, there are enough of those out there and some are good in OU without the move.
And the only TM/tutor moves I think they'll bring back are the elemental punches. Think about it - they were TMs in GSC, and tutor moves ever since.
Lol that's exactly where I wanted to start talking about..I'm not going to talk about SR's typing. That's really a can of worms that does not deserve to be opened.
Excadrill was banned for a multitude of reasons, similar to Garchomp. It simply centralized the game around sand, while also being able to get past teams that even had the best checks for it. Stealth Rock is not in a similar position. It is a common battle condition, but it does not break open the game against teams that are prepared for it.You are losing the point. You said before that SR is good because it keeps in check threats such as Rona and Dnite.
And i asked you how is this a reason to prove that SR is good for the meta.
Excadrill checked a multitude of threats such as Thundurus, Deoxys-S, Jolteon, Infernape, Terakion and more, but was deemed unhealthy for the meta and so it was banned. Every single poke that was banned brought some pros to the table of the OU meta, but they were all banned because their cons (they were broken) out weighted their pros (checking stuff).
So saying that SR is good because it checks some threats alone, is meaningless, if you don't make a mention to his cons also. Every single aspect in the pokemon game brings pros to the table, but to see if they are good in general we have to measure these goods in comparison with the negatives.
Those rumors are, quite frankly, insane.Okay so this SR discussion is fun and all, but lets talk about these fun little rumours from PokeJungle:
http://pokejungle.net/2012/04/06/rumor-black-2-white-2-details/
Probably, very likely, more than anything, these are fake. (But I would love for that new Ghost-type to be real).
So what are people expecting from CoroCoro and Pokemon Smash in a few days? What would you like to see (within reason!)?
Indeed. I have to say, I am impressed at whoever made these up. If these were rumours for a new generation, I would probably find it believable.Those rumors are, quite frankly, insane.
I expect to see footage of our new protagonists, male and female. Perhaps we'll also see some new seasonal changes, new areas, and a few new gym layouts. Outside of that, I'm not sure we'll find out any plot info until further down the road.
Following on from our reveal on Monday, the official site has confirmed that Pokémon Smash's episode due to air on the 15th will air footage of Pokémon Black 2 & White 2 including having Junichi Masuda on show for a playthrough and showcasing a promotional video. This is also said to showcase a battle between Black Kyurem & White Kyurem and showcase more information on the Pokémon Meloetta. This follows on from the episode due to air this weekend which will also show some Black 2 & White 2 information. Keep your eyes on our site for the news as it happens
Heatmor. Pre-evo. This alone makes me believe these rumours are real. That's clearly something Game Freak would do.Two new Pokemon related to Unova Pokemon are revealed. First is pre-evolution of Heatmor, Normal, lacks the mechanical features of the former.
Nothing about that should be believable to anyone.
Look at all that information. Look at how it ~just so happens~ to fall in line with the OMG NEW REGION/LEADERS/POKEMON expectations, following Pokemon, OH MAN A KNIGHT POKEMON, etc
And just how much there is and how detailed it is (take a drink every time he says "classy" or some variant on it)
Meanwhile grass owl with plant on top