why not just do a revamp of this analysis? i'm pretty sure we can all agree that subseed simisage is bad and a few qc members think that np and all-out-attacker should be merged. i think so too.
the overview of the old analysis is not so great; it just talks about how simisage compares with other grass-types. it barely talks about anything else besides its high speed and nasty plot
Basically I'm reserving Simisage.I wouldn't be opposed to a Simisage revamp, it is old and needs to be written with Amoonguss in mind. If you are alright with it that would be great :) If not we can just work on this set, as it shouldn't have been rejected so quickly.
kk go for itI think I might do Murkrow. I'll play around with it seeing as it fits the team I'm making and I'll be using one of the things you mentioned as possible additions for the set. So it might be a few days before I start writing the skeleton, but I'll tentatively take it for now.
Holy Shit Murkrow is amazing in this meta. Consider this a proper reservation.
sureReserving Luxray.
go aheadI'll take Fraxure.
alrightyReserving Tangela.
dropping one analysis and then immediately asking to take over another is also not something to be taken lightly, especially without good reason.dropping Luxray sry
I can take over writing Charizard, and I'll work off of Amarillo's thing.
It won't have to go through QC again, right?