This is coming off of the thread talking about whether or not SR is broken, and is an attempt on my part to take a step and see if we as a community actually want to do something about this issue. The big question here is whether or not SR should be suspected. Not whether not not it is broken. The purpose of suspecting would be to determine whether or not it is broken. A ton of people have cited in the SR thread that many of the arguments being made are difficult to support or evaluate because they are simply too hypothetical; none of us really knows what a meta without SR would be like. Well, this is the chance to do some testing and find out for real. I personally feel that, even if we don't ban SR (a possibility I am very open to), having a ladder without it would be an incredibly valuable experience--just how much does SR impact our metagame, and does it do so in an unhealthy way?
Answer the poll according to what fits you most closely--even if you don't believe SR is broken, but if you think a test would be beneficial, give the second answer. Conversely, if you think SR is broken but think testing would be a bad idea for one reason or another, answer the third. Feel free to explain your choices and to talk about why you believe SR should or shouldn't be tested, but remember that the main focus of this thread is simply to discuss the benefits and disadvantages of a SR suspect test, not whether SR is broken or not.
Answer the poll according to what fits you most closely--even if you don't believe SR is broken, but if you think a test would be beneficial, give the second answer. Conversely, if you think SR is broken but think testing would be a bad idea for one reason or another, answer the third. Feel free to explain your choices and to talk about why you believe SR should or shouldn't be tested, but remember that the main focus of this thread is simply to discuss the benefits and disadvantages of a SR suspect test, not whether SR is broken or not.