Season V Farm League - Week 1

[pokebasket]

Lost, GG

 

[AuraRayquaza]

Confirming gg

 

[Agammemnon]

Just to confirm something : are we playing WITH or WITHOUT the Pokebank ? (XY OU)

 

[Crash Your Face]

Haven't seen opponent,activity post

 

[BlankZero]

cross posting this from his wall as well.

My message:

Just a reminder we are supposed to play today in 30 minutes.

I will be on as much as I can until Midnight tonight.

If you cannot play today, you need to send me a Public Message on my profile with a more suitable time.

I'll be CopyPastaing this to the Farm League thread as an activity post.

 

[Oglemi]

Just to confirm something : are we playing WITH or WITHOUT the Pokebank ? (XY OU)

with

 

[Metal Sonic]

sub my opponent plz ? ;-;
I'm sure there are a ton of other people willing to play

same here.

maybe allow those who were john by their opponents, 2 games next week? to make up for the lost battle

 

[ogasian]

Won versus fegeget, good game man :)

 

[Fegeget]

Confirming ^^

 

[symphonyx64]

My opponent is incapable of responding to messages.

 

[Ajwf]

RODAN and I are probably going to play tomorrow, somewhere around 24 hours from this message. I've been in contact with him yesterday and knew he wasn't around today, so we're both still in touch.

 

[Jeebitz]

modafocka nigga and I have had some messages back and forth, but I haven't heard from him since sunday. idk when we are going to do this battle

 

[ShootingStarmie]

Still no reply from my opponent. He hasn't been on since Sunday. Activity

 

[scorpdestroyer]

Ive been told my opponent hangs out in a Showdown room, I'll try finding him there on Sunday

 

[BlankZero]

cross posting this from his wall as well.

My message:

He hasn't been on since Monday

Requesting Activity, but if he shows I'll still play him.

 

[Metal Sonic]

He hasn't been on since Monday

Requesting Activity, but if he shows I'll still play him.

no activity wins that is sad right

i am in the same situation

 

[BlankZero]

no activity wins that is sad right

i am in the same situation

I find it entirely shitty that there is no obviously punishment for Johning. Some of us have something to prove in our respective tiers.

 

[fuzzy]

Its quite the effort to catch Sheks online. I don't know, we'll keep trying.

Have a nice day

 

[modafocka]

modafocka nigga and I have had some messages back and forth, but I haven't heard from him since sunday. idk when we are going to do this battle

 

[sandshrewz]

Just something that came up to my mind I guess. How about people who 'activity win' if subs are not happening will get a + and those who are inactive get a - so instead of just the w/l there's also activity for managers or whoever to consider? So maybe something like 3-1(+2) or 2-0(-3) etc? :o! Might aslo be easier for Oglemi to group people by activity together when they're all 0-0 or w/e yaaaaa :o

 

[Srn]

Just something that came up to my mind I guess. How about people who 'activity win' if subs are not happening will get a + and those who are inactive get a - so instead of just the w/l there's also activity for managers or whoever to consider? So maybe something like 3-1(+2) or 2-0(-3) etc? :o! Might aslo be easier for Oglemi to group people by activity together when they're all 0-0 or w/e yaaaaa :o

That's a good idea, when managers are having to decide between, say, two 4-0 people, the one with the better activity will be favored, making the ranking even more diverse. Second this.

 

[Pako]

I'll play with my opp tomorrow night

 

[Quite Quiet]

Just something that came up to my mind I guess. How about people who 'activity win' if subs are not happening will get a + and those who are inactive get a - so instead of just the w/l there's also activity for managers or whoever to consider? So maybe something like 3-1(+2) or 2-0(-3) etc? :o! Might aslo be easier for Oglemi to group people by activity together when they're all 0-0 or w/e yaaaaa :o

I just wonder what happen to the people who get their battles done right away then. Because what's the difference between 3-1 and 2-1(+1)? Is the 3-1 more important or the 2-1(+1) when they've both showed they are active. The (+1) just tell you they were around for that week, but not if they would've won or lost against that opponent.

 

[sandshrewz]

I just wonder what happen to the people who get their battles done right away then. Because what's the difference between 3-1 and 2-1(+1)? Is the 3-1 more important or the 2-1(+1) when they've both showed they are active. The (+1) just tell you they were around for that week, but not if they would've won or lost against that opponent.

w/l should probably always come first for matchups. But it's p safe having both of them paired together anyway if there aren't other similar w/l. Activity can be ignored as if they've never played a week as if they joined late or w/e. The +/- thing is more useful for people who've done few matches so it's easier to pair them or there are many similar w/l people. So like if there are 4 for 1-1 then you can group the + with + or neutral and - with - or neutral until you get an ideal one. Something like that but yeaaa up to Oglemi if he likes this xd

 

[Private]

Won