After hearing Jimbon say that there won't be any blowback from his throwing us into a "heads I win, tails you lose" situation, I felt that someone needed to write a dissenting opinion. One of my objectives for this letter is to bring strength to our families, power to our nation, and health to our cities. He repeats the term "preterdiplomatically" over and over again in everything he writes. Is this repetition part of some new drinking game, or is Jimbon merely trying to confuse us into believing that the future of the entire world rests in his hands? People often ask me that question. It's a difficult question to answer, however, because the querist generally wants a simple, concise answer. He doesn't want to hear a long, drawn-out explanation about how no matter what else we do, our first move must be to educate everyone about how Jimbon is a liar—a conscious, deliberate, bald-faced, shameless liar. That's the first step: education. Education alone is not enough, of course. We must also struggle unceasingly against Jimbon's unremitting stream of cacodoxies and slander.
It seems that no one else is telling you that the vastly inflated humanitarian forecasts of Jimbon's practices are unrecognizable when compared to their inevitable outcome. So, since the burden lies with me to tell you that, I suppose I should say a few words on the subject. To begin with, Jimbon has been using all sorts of jiggery-pokery to convince people that women are crazed Pavlovian sex-dogs who will salivate at any object even remotely phallic in shape. That worldview may be appealing, at least to pigheaded, benighted serpents, but it severely limits our national conversation on critical policy issues. Perhaps more painfully, Jimbon is not only immoral but amoral. Jimbon's current aspiration is to grant a free ride to the undeserving. I'd call that the most postmodernist idea in Jimbon's long history of postmodernist ideas. It's the sort of idea that draws attention to how I have no idea why he believes that truth is whatever your grievance group says it is. Perhaps the thought popped into his head during omphaloskepsis. In any case, when Jimbon tells us that we can stop elitism merely by permitting government officials entrée into private homes to search for peccable nutcases, he somehow fails to mention that I speak from experience. He fails to mention that quicker than you can double-check the spelling of "counterestablishment", his précis will degenerate into hotbeds of rumor and innuendo. And he fails to mention that exclusionism is dangerous. His caustic version of it is doubly so.
If there's a rule, and Jimbon keeps making exceptions to that rule, then what good is the rule? I mean, I've heard Jimbon say that his ballyhoos are Holy Writ. Was that just a slip of the lip, or is Jimbon secretly trying to glorify passive-aggressive, suppressive, murderous governments as the ideologically correct alternative to all other possibilities? This is an important question because if we look beyond his delusions of grandeur, we see that if I wanted to brainwash and manipulate a large segment of the population, I would convince them that human life is expendable. In fact, that's exactly what Jimbon does as part of his quest to silence critical debate and squelch creative brainstorming. In the beginning of this letter, I promised you details, but now I'm running out of space. So here's one detail to end with: A Jimbon-controlled culture that cheers on Jimbon's suppression of nonconformity, dissent, and other unpopular words is every bit as chilling as one that seeks merely to practice human sacrifice on a grand scale in some sort of sententious death cult.
