Recent content by gizchim

uh... how would it be? its addressing its causes specifically, not asserting they come from one of two defined viewpoints beforehand.

and that cause is circumstantial. each illness addressed on its own terms, not pigeon-holed into pre-existing bias; certain diseases develop and environmental, other diseases are innate. others are innate but triggered from external causes. everything is not one or the other.

nature versus nurture was always a stupid question; the reality isn't nature versus nurture, it is nature and nurture. simply put, nature defines the template, nurture embellishes it. the brain defines who we are, and it is defined at birth by genetic process and our parents; this is nature. our...

It's pretty good. I like the contrast and the shading for it, and the pose has a very nice flow to it. Critique: what is going on with the muscles on his forearm up top, exactly? the hand on the bottom might be a little too big. the hair is a little bit too flat compared to the motion the...

Chess. Chess is purely a matter of thought, there is no element of randomness to it like in Pokemon.

These results are not at all surprising.

Artguments. :) But no, i'm not really arguing anymore. I just had to get that pun off of my chest. I probaby won't reply either, unless SEO wants to specifically address me.

I dunno. I had some pretty nice things to say.

Honestly, SEO, you kind of brought it on yourself. He was going out of his way to be kind and only really focused on two things that bugged him, two things that he felt should be known and addressed so that - even if you didn't want to address in that picture - you could press on in the future...