Vertex
Last Activity:
Apr 23, 2014 at 10:51 AM
Joined:
May 2, 2013
Messages:
312
Trophy Points:
0

Vertex

Vertex was last seen:
Apr 23, 2014 at 10:51 AM
    1. False Sense
      False Sense
      I see... For the most part, I agree with you. Serperior has some serious flaws in the form of poor coverage, low initial attack power, and the fact that it's boosting move and main attack move, Leaf Storm, only has 8 PP. For those reasons, it will likely need to have its counters removed more so than other sweepers before it can attempt to sweep.
    2. Shurtugal
      Shurtugal
      you can leave comments to my suggestions here xd
    3. Magcargo 2
      Magcargo 2
      I see. Infernape is more of a wall breaker to allow something else like landorus to sweep.
      I still think that set would be more effective on a sun team with a different pursuit trapper like weavile/scizor.
    4. Magcargo 2
      Magcargo 2
      I'm not sure. Do you have entry hazard support from custap skarmory/Forretress?
    5. Magcargo 2
      Magcargo 2
      Yeah, infernape is pretty good on sun teams.
      You are using mixed ape on a sun team correct?
    6. dark
      dark
      thanks for your advice
    7. VN.
      VN.
      yea man sure
    8. Halcyon.
      Halcyon.
      Yeah i'll definitely take a look at it. And I highly doubt Chaos cares about how many likes any thread gets haha. Also, if this new format means we won't get hacked again, then I'm all for it.
    9. False Sense
      False Sense
      Yes, it seems that social groups have been removed, at least for now. I heard that they're going to add them back in at some point, but that might not be for awhile...

      And yes, I hate this new format too.
    10. ginganinja
      ginganinja
      That thread went up without my approval (which is fine I guess), but I am watching it intently. CCAT has a history of inactivity, so you will really need to work hard to maintain discussion and interest all the way through. Get good battlers to take a look and post ideas, get RMT people to post (since most of them are good at spotting weaknesses), and yea, just keep the interest. If you can maintain a good amount of interest all the way through then it will work, but if not the thread will die and that is something im really worried about. Give it your best shot man.
    11. Pocket
      Pocket
      the biggest challenge for CCAT is maintaining participant's interest throughout the endeavor. You should not drag each stage for too long. You must also supervise the discussion to make sure it's leading towards the right direction.

      If you think you can sustain the enthusiasm for this project, then go for it
    12. Pocket
      Pocket
      uh do you know how to do one
    13. Dice
      Dice
      don't let your sole set rejection discourage you from contributing in the future!
    14. sirndpt
      sirndpt
      basically, yeah. content is QC's job since they're the people who're selected for metagame knowledge & stuff! while that doesn't mean other people can't weigh in, it's really better to do that explicitly / not include content corrections in the gp stage, especially since tbh writers might not always carefully consider the edits they're making. it's not your fault; apologies if i worded anything too harshly in the thread but yeah it's definitely something i would steer clear of.
    15. alexwolf
      alexwolf
      Ok so here is what we decided. Yanmega is pretty bad right now and we are considering not giving it an analysis. However, if you can gather logs showcasing its effectiveness then we may reconsider. Just make sure that you are willing to defend it if you decide to make a thread about it, and to gather good logs against good opponents, not against random scrubs that Yanmega barely does antyhig useful ok?
    16. Governess
      Governess
      Late thx :)
    17. alexwolf
      alexwolf
      Ok then, i will talk with the rest of the QC team and tell you if Yanmega needs an update.
    18. alexwolf
      alexwolf
      Oh sry, i forgot you had told me you wanted Weavile, so go ahead and take it if you still want it...
    19. Halcyon.
      Halcyon.
      You know what they say, if you can't beat 'em, join 'em. Why don't you try using one of your own?
    20. Halcyon.
      Halcyon.
      Well, maybe. But like I said, I'm just honored that you decided to nominate me, no matter what they decide. Thanks!
    21. Halcyon.
      Halcyon.
      Wow, man I really appreciate that. I doubt that they'll accept it (I like the team, but I don't think it's THAT good), but still, I'm honored that you decided to nominate me :) thanks!
    22. alexwolf
      alexwolf
      Oh i didn't answer, i thought i did... Anyway, i will talk with the QC team and see if we will update the analysis via SCMS or with an update. Also thx!
    23. Gary2346
      Gary2346
      Thanks dude!
    24. Lavos Spawn
      Lavos Spawn
      aye, there is the famed specs hyd + sdef cele + skarm core.
    25. Gary2346
      Gary2346
      I never took over agility Lucario lol.
  • Loading...
  • Loading...
  • Loading...
  • Signature

    current analysis count: 1 | VM me for an OU rate! | i'm VertexM on PS!

    [​IMG][​IMG][​IMG][​IMG][​IMG][​IMG][​IMG][​IMG][​IMG][​IMG][​IMG]

    About

    My Characteristic:
    Loves to eat
  • Loading...