1. Our third apparel sale is live. New design + reprint of the athletic design. Support us and get a shirt!
  2. Welcome to Smogon Forums! Please take a minute to read the rules.
  3. Click here to ensure that you never miss a new SmogonU video upload!
May 2, 2013
Trophy Points:
    1. ginganinja
      That thread went up without my approval (which is fine I guess), but I am watching it intently. CCAT has a history of inactivity, so you will really need to work hard to maintain discussion and interest all the way through. Get good battlers to take a look and post ideas, get RMT people to post (since most of them are good at spotting weaknesses), and yea, just keep the interest. If you can maintain a good amount of interest all the way through then it will work, but if not the thread will die and that is something im really worried about. Give it your best shot man.
    2. Pocket
      the biggest challenge for CCAT is maintaining participant's interest throughout the endeavor. You should not drag each stage for too long. You must also supervise the discussion to make sure it's leading towards the right direction.

      If you think you can sustain the enthusiasm for this project, then go for it
    3. Pocket
      uh do you know how to do one
    4. dice
      don't let your sole set rejection discourage you from contributing in the future!
    5. sirndpt
      basically, yeah. content is QC's job since they're the people who're selected for metagame knowledge & stuff! while that doesn't mean other people can't weigh in, it's really better to do that explicitly / not include content corrections in the gp stage, especially since tbh writers might not always carefully consider the edits they're making. it's not your fault; apologies if i worded anything too harshly in the thread but yeah it's definitely something i would steer clear of.
    6. alexwolf
      Ok so here is what we decided. Yanmega is pretty bad right now and we are considering not giving it an analysis. However, if you can gather logs showcasing its effectiveness then we may reconsider. Just make sure that you are willing to defend it if you decide to make a thread about it, and to gather good logs against good opponents, not against random scrubs that Yanmega barely does antyhig useful ok?
    7. Governess
      Late thx :)
    8. alexwolf
      Ok then, i will talk with the rest of the QC team and tell you if Yanmega needs an update.
    9. alexwolf
      Oh sry, i forgot you had told me you wanted Weavile, so go ahead and take it if you still want it...
    10. Halcyon.
      You know what they say, if you can't beat 'em, join 'em. Why don't you try using one of your own?
    11. Halcyon.
      Well, maybe. But like I said, I'm just honored that you decided to nominate me, no matter what they decide. Thanks!
    12. Halcyon.
      Wow, man I really appreciate that. I doubt that they'll accept it (I like the team, but I don't think it's THAT good), but still, I'm honored that you decided to nominate me :) thanks!
    13. alexwolf
      Oh i didn't answer, i thought i did... Anyway, i will talk with the QC team and see if we will update the analysis via SCMS or with an update. Also thx!
    14. Gary
      Thanks dude!
    15. Lavos
      aye, there is the famed specs hyd + sdef cele + skarm core.
    16. Gary
      I never took over agility Lucario lol.
    17. Nutrix
      Since the Tangrowth analysis hasn't been fully written up yet or given its final QC approval stamp, it's too early to GP check it; you should check back after its been moved to "copyediting."
    18. Don Honchkrorleone
      Don Honchkrorleone

      75% of my groups were invitations. 23% are the ones I joined for free. 2% I either own or just for fun
    19. Gary
      Not right now. Why?
    20. Gary
      Makes since.
    21. Gary
      That idea that you're talking about with False sounds great! If you choose to do it, please send both False and I a preview of it, so we can see what is looks like before you release it. Only one stipulation for making this thread: False and I have a lot of control over what you decide to post on the thread. If we say to post a certain update, then you MUST do it. For example, if I say to update the group on the current tournament that we're doing, and you choose not to, then we will delete the thread and give the reins to someone else. If you choose to accept these terms, then you may create it.
    22. False Sense
      False Sense
      An Article thread?

      Could you give me some more details about what this would be?
    23. False Sense
      False Sense
      "So, if we let you into the group, would you be an active contributor? We want members who will actively participate in group discussions and projects."

    24. False Sense
      False Sense
      ...How did you know I was going to ask that next...?

      Well, you sound like you'd make a nice addition to the group. Welcome to the Smogon Creators Organization. : )

      If you'd like to introduce yourself to the rest of the group, or if you have any questions regarding the group you'd like to ask, you can do both in the Introduction thread. Also, please read through the group rules before posting.
    25. False Sense
      False Sense
      Interesting. So, how experienced would you say you are in OU? Would you consider yourself knowledgeable?
  • Loading...
  • Loading...
  • Loading...
  • Signature

    bludz: the thing is [AM] set [up his roasting] in such a way that at first you thought he was being fully chill about it like me or something but then realize that he just subtly destroyed you


    My Characteristic:
    Likes to thrash about
  • Loading...