After being haxed to death by Froslass I can honestly say I think it needs to go. I was sitting comfortably at number 5 on the ladder before I was haxed to death in 7 battles against stinking Froslass.
Just wanted to say that this is a terrible argument, and I could just as easily say Froslass without Spikes is just a weak but annoying attacker. Without her Ghost-typing, high base speed, or Substitute or some other integral part of her is clearly not broken. Snow Cloak is part of Froslass and, as such, shouldn't be banned to nerf Froslass, to squeeze her into the metagame (which it doesn't actually do, since Cursed Body hasn't been released according to the stickied thread, but that is what it tries to do), especially when Snow Cloak is not broken on all of its users, so it, itself cannot be broken.Froslass without snow cloak is just a fast pokemon with a utility movepool that will die to any hit. By herself, she isnt broken, just ban snow cloak, mamo and glaceon have other abilities as well.
Because people worry about banning things because they don't like them. People immediately see weather as bad because it's more broken in OU, so they assume it carries over to UU. It's painfully obvious that these Pokemon aren't broken. They get like 5 or 6% usage. And there's a ton of drawbacks to using them; namely, you get tons of SR weak Pokemon in a metagame where spinning is difficult (except for Foresight Hitmontop, but Hitmontop cannot restore its health and will eventually go down) and weaknesses to Fire, Rock, Steel, Fighting (except for Froslass). Froslass is frail as hell, her Blizzards aren't that powerful, and she can set up Spikes. Spikes are everywhere in UU whether there's Froslass or not. We have Deoxys fucking D with over 300 Speed and amazing defenses, and people call out Froslass as broken. It's really easy to get 3 layers of Spikes in this meta. Froslass just lets Hail teams get that too.May I ask why people are having so many problems with Froslass?What is the difference between Froslass dodging a few attacks (maybe) and setting up Spikes and something like Deo-D tanking the hits and setting up Spikes?More annoying seeing an attack miss vs it doing no damage?
Pokemon aren't banned based on annoyance.God knows if that was the case Jirachi and Togekiss would be Uber.Froslass has almost no attacking ability and no defenses.It also requires Abomasnow on the team.This stacks common weaknesses like fire and rock.I'm not saying it isn't annoying but like I said,many Pokes have hax sets like ParaFusion or ParaFlinch.
I'm honestly wondering.Looking at June stats, Froslass is #27 and Abomasnow is sitting at #35 yet I see people wanting to nominate either Froslass or Snow Warning just because it is "annoying".I thought things were banned for being broken instead of on whim.Speaking of which, why was Wobbuffet allowed to be voted on when it is an RU Poke?
I completely agree with this post.I'm eager and willing to listen to the other side but it does just seem like people are just going ALL CAPS RAGE because evasion is involved.Because people worry about banning things because they don't like them. People immediately see weather as bad because it's more broken in OU, so they assume it carries over to UU. It's painfully obvious that these Pokemon aren't broken. They get like 5 or 6% usage. And there's a ton of drawbacks to using them; namely, you get tons of SR weak Pokemon in a metagame where spinning is difficult (except for Foresight Hitmontop, but Hitmontop cannot restore its health and will eventually go down) and weaknesses to Fire, Rock, Steel, Fighting (except for Froslass). Froslass is frail as hell, her Blizzards aren't that powerful, and she can set up Spikes. Spikes are everywhere in UU whether there's Froslass or not. We have Deoxys fucking D with over 300 Speed and amazing defenses, and people call out Froslass as broken. It's really easy to get 3 layers of Spikes in this meta. Froslass just lets Hail teams get that too.
I'm sorry to hear you got haxed to death but does annoyed=ban worthy?I've had a Skarmory flinch haxed to death by a Jirachi but I don't ask to see Jirachi going Uber and he can do his stuff without an outside Pokemon.I guess the question is simple.Is Froslass so annoying that it overrides the need to be determined broken?I am more annoyed at Froslass then anything. I had a game where I outplayed the opponent at everyturn, yet still lost due to being Para'd 4 turns in a row, followed by 2 misses with a 100% accuracy move. And that happened the next battle I played against it too. Heck I even have probably the best counter to Froslass in the metagame on my team (Snorlax) and I still hate it.
Since the pointless ban on Brightpowder, I can imagine voters getting annoyed at Froslass a few times being enough to actually ban the thing.I'm sorry to hear you got haxed to death but does annoyed=ban worthy?I've had a Skarmory flinch haxed to death by a Jirachi but I don't ask to see Jirachi going Uber and he can do his stuff without an outside Pokemon.I guess the question is simple.Is Froslass so annoying that it overrides the need to be determined broken?
If we relied on past precedent in making all our policy decisions we would have never banned drizzle/swift swim or moody either. Sometimes you have to do things that haven't been done before.Can we not ban abilities, and kick out Froslass instead? We didn't ban Sand Veil in OU, we banned Garchomp. There's a major consistency issue if we ban Snow Cloak from UU, but didn't ban Sand Veil in OU. Plus, Froslass has one ability. With Snow Cloak banned, Froslass would be Soft Banned anyways, along with the NU Beartic, who is not broken at all. Why should we necessarily ban an extra Pokemon when we know it to be not broken? Nobody complains about Snow Cloak Glaceon or Mammoswine. Even with the evasion neither of those two Pokemon are doing something significant or game breaking, except possibly hitting again. But since both are commonly choiced and some very common things resist their stabs, the worst that might happen is you have a last ditch revenge kill thrown off. Froslass on the other hand sets up layer after layer of Spikes, and can amplify Snow Cloak with Thunder Wave and Substitute, and her sticking around allows her to keep her Spikes down by blocking spin.
This isn't something we are pioneering here, like we were with Moody and Drizzle/Swift Swim. We are directly contradicting a notion that happened just one round before. Theres no point to contradict that. And UU isn't the place to challenge something that effects all metagames.If we relied on past precedent in making all our policy decisions we would have never banned drizzle/swift swim or moody either. Sometimes you have to do things that haven't been done before.
UU is not the place to argue adding Sand Veil/Snow Cloak to Evasion clause, feel free to bring that up in PR. Evasion Clause effects ALL metagames, not just UU.This is especially the case for something like Snow Cloak, which should have been banned on principle a long time ago. It makes no sense that we have banned double team/minimize/brightpowder when Snow Cloak has double the effect without using up an item slot or a moveslot and a turn. Given that we've already determined that Evasion Clause should stay (and have banned other abilities that boost evasion, like Moody) I don't see why Snow Cloak should be treated any different. Hopefully, if UU voters take the lead on this by banning evasion-boosting abilities, OU voters will be able to look at our example and do the same up there.
Snow Cloak does not break either of them. Snow Cloak is not broken on 3/4 of its users, only on Froslass. Therefore Snow Cloak as a whole can not broken. As opposed to Moody which was broken on everything relevant.And if you don't think Snow Cloak is a problem on Mamoswine/Glaceon, you have either never played a hail team with an offensive team or run aura sphere on all your Pokemon. A single unlucky turn against either of those Pokemon can and has cost players the game. It does not break either of them, but it is certainly not trivial.
The problem set that I've said ISN'T Spikes.May I ask why people are having so many problems with Froslass?What is the difference between Froslass dodging a few attacks (maybe) and setting up Spikes and something like Deo-D tanking the hits and setting up Spikes?More annoying seeing an attack miss vs it doing no damage?
Pokemon aren't banned based on annoyance.God knows if that was the case Jirachi and Togekiss would be Uber.Froslass has almost no attacking ability and no defenses.It also requires Abomasnow on the team.This stacks common weaknesses like fire and rock.I'm not saying it isn't annoying but like I said,many Pokes have hax sets like ParaFusion or ParaFlinch.
I'm honestly wondering.Looking at June stats, Froslass is #27 and Abomasnow is sitting at #35 yet I see people wanting to nominate either Froslass or Snow Warning just because it is "annoying".I thought things were banned for being broken instead of on whim.Speaking of which, why was Wobbuffet allowed to be voted on when it is an RU Poke?
I am usually against banning abilities, but in this case, I have to agree with Flare. If any item/move that increases evasion is banned, then I don't understand why Snow Cloak wouldn't be. Snow Cloak is most prevalent on Froslass, but it's a problem on nearly everything that has it. Yes, pokemon is a game of luck, but that doesn't mean that people should rely on it to win games. Just one unlucky miss usually means the end for a player, and I was under the impression that that was something that we were trying to avoid. I'll go ahead and make a hail team for when the new round starts to see if that changes my mind, but from playing hail a number of times, that's my impression on it.If we relied on past precedent in making all our policy decisions we would have never banned drizzle/swift swim or moody either. Sometimes you have to do things that haven't been done before.
This is especially the case for something like Snow Cloak, which should have been banned on principle a long time ago. It makes no sense that we have banned double team/minimize/brightpowder when Snow Cloak has double the effect without using up an item slot or a moveslot and a turn. Given that we've already determined that Evasion Clause should stay (and have banned other abilities that boost evasion, like Moody) I don't see why Snow Cloak should be treated any different. Hopefully, if UU voters take the lead on this by banning evasion-boosting abilities, OU voters will be able to look at our example and do the same up there.
And if you don't think Snow Cloak is a problem on Mamoswine/Glaceon, you have either never played a hail team with an offensive team or run aura sphere on all your Pokemon. A single unlucky turn against either of those Pokemon can and has cost players the game. It does not break either of them, but it is certainly not trivial.
It's unfortunate that Froslass gets soft banned until Cursed Body is released and Mamoswine no longer gets egg moves due to being locked into Thick Fat, but barring another complex ban, those are necessary evils.
This, for heaven's sake.And if you don't think Snow Cloak is a problem on Mamoswine/Glaceon, you have either never played a hail team with an offensive team or run aura sphere on all your Pokemon. A single unlucky turn against either of those Pokemon can and has cost players the game. It does not break either of them, but it is certainly not trivial.
This this this.Because people worry about banning things because they don't like them. People immediately see weather as bad because it's more broken in OU, so they assume it carries over to UU. It's painfully obvious that these Pokemon aren't broken. They get like 5 or 6% usage. And there's a ton of drawbacks to using them; namely, you get tons of SR weak Pokemon in a metagame where spinning is difficult (except for Foresight Hitmontop, but Hitmontop cannot restore its health and will eventually go down) and weaknesses to Fire, Rock, Steel, Fighting (except for Froslass). Froslass is frail as hell, her Blizzards aren't that powerful, and she can set up Spikes. Spikes are everywhere in UU whether there's Froslass or not. We have Deoxys fucking D with over 300 Speed and amazing defenses, and people call out Froslass as broken. It's really easy to get 3 layers of Spikes in this meta. Froslass just lets Hail teams get that too.
Togekiss has swept me before, and I missed every single turn from being paralyzed and flinched. Its adding an extra luck related factor to the game that's simply unnecessary and makes the game more the RNG.As FlareBlitz said, it simply should be banned on principle -- it's adding an extra luck related factor to the game that's simply unnecessary and makes the game more the RNG, just as Moody and Brightpowder -- both of which were banned -- did.
You could just as easily put Togekiss/Jirachi in here instead of froslass, and hax instead of evasion and the exact same argument would apply. I'm pretty sure that missing parahax + snow cloak is much less common than missing parahax + flinch from jirachi/togekiss. In fact it is. You are much less common to miss froslass than the flinchhaxers. Paralyze is constant with both, but flinch chance is 60% while snow cloak miss is 20%. And froslass only gets 4 chances at a sub is she isnt holding leftovers, and i'm sure you can argue that focus sash is far superior on her. (at least how I use her)There is a certain degree of control when handling Togekiss and Jirachi. People may occasionally lose to incredible hax, but that could happen with any Pokemon. However, when this incredible hax is as consistent as Froslass, with Snow Cloak + Sub + Paralysis, sense of control is pretty much gone out the window. That's what abusing Evasion does.
You can do all of this against Froslass as well. Add on no miss moves and bullet punch (however less common in UU they may be).You can circumvent Togekiss and Jirachi quite easily. A bulky Pokemon that resist their moves are good counters. Zapdos can pretty much wall Togekiss all day. Substitute blocks status. Once Togekiss is poisoned or paralyzed, it is crippled.