Agreeing that Celever's "not your business" thing is suspicious, and I've been suspicious of him otherwise, too.
i think from reading another smogon noc, the anti-scumread philosophy is especially one d1 when the mafia have realitively few clues, it allows them to pick a good assassination target based on who is honing in on the mafia the best. however i think that is dubious at best and the benefits far outweigh the potential downsides. posting scumreads is excellent for the village for a host of reasons, most notably documentation of peoples opinions on large amounts of other players. in the end the mafia gets a slightly more informed kill for a much more informed village, a great tradeoff for the villageI'm curious about this. What makes you think scumreads is more beneficial to the mafia than the village? The mafia already know who is mafia and who is village. Scumreads are a way the village can shrink this disparity in information. Yes, scumreads are also a way for scum to confuse players and cause mislynches, but without scumreads the only tool we would have to find scum would be inspects--unless you're suggesting a mass role claim?
Annnnnd i immediately changed my mind about you having any logic at all when you said "scumreads help mafia too much". The whole point is that mafia start with the info advantage, therefore the village should attempt to close that gap however they can. scumreads are a great way of dispersing information and reads that are correct but may not be apparent to the whole village, in addition scumreads help gather information about both the posters and their reads.What I am trying to say is that the mafia already has more information than the town and while they gather more than can easily adjust to said information and take advantage of it such as changing their playstyle.
Correct I did say they benefit the mafia more than the village. However I did not say they help the mafia too much. Their is a difference.You said that scumreads are more beneficial to the mafia than to the village. If you'd like to retreat that statement, that's fine. I do agree with you in that I'd also like to hear AG's suspicions regarding Celever.
This is a big fat gigantic misrep. 1. My vote on him was for pressure which I have said multiple times because his reads are shit 2. I think he is trying to say that he is vanilla town which means that you defending him because "PR" is bullshit and anyway I don't really believe him anyway 3. Risk = losing a vanilla townie who plays really poorly Reward = completing 1/3 of the game , yeah even in normal play not only will I vote him, hell yeah I would be fine with lynching him(not a scumtell its my playstyle) re: Shining Latios fucking over and choking a gameSpiffy]On top of not posting for awhile said:@Metal Sonic has admitted to voting for someone he thinks is vanilla town, which is either stupid or a scum slip.
Provide postular evidenceSpiffy said:He also has done nothing the entire game, and like Celever until I voted for him,
Blackhawk, Jalmont and yourself have already been written in my reads listSpiffy said:Metal Sonic, give me reads of all of the recent sub-ins as well as Blackhawk11, Jalmont, and myself.
I'm going to answer specific questions in bold in the quote and then explain my overall reasoning below.
Just saying, I don't see how me asking barty to elaborate is not a good idea, especially when he vaguely claims power role already. Alright lets consider 2 scenarios
Barty is village with PR
The mafia knows Barty is not mafia. Therefore, Barty is a prime target for mafia, because they don't have any ideas of other village PRs, so therefore it makes the most sense to kill him. Even if he doesn't reveal exactly what his role is, he is almost guaranteed to be targeted, and killed. This again is because at the moment of him claiming power role, he shoots up to the mafia's first target. The only way he survives the night is the bodyguard a) believing him, which at the time was not reliable at all and b) deciding to protect him, again, he will need to find a way to alleviate suspicion in order to convince our hypothetical bodyguard to protect. How useful then, that he tell us about his role and help us decide that he is village! Basically, if there is no bg and/or the bg doesn't protect it doesn't hurt him to claim because he dies anyways! If there is a bg a claim will go a long way in protecting himself and denying the mafia a essential kill!
Barty is mafia
Forcing mafia to talk more only helps the village, as there is a greater chance of error with every sentence. By claiming "if you lynch me the village will regret", he manages to avoid lynching from the village without the risk of a counterclaim. If he is mafia it only helps the village by forcing him to claim and if you can't understand that reasoning you really need to leave this game.
Basically, unless I'm making huge logical (noob) errors, I fail to see how pressuring barty is not a good idea, village or scum. honestly i think this is a case of OMGUS, which is pretty understandable and an easy way to divert attention...
Also if you think if me and Celever were mafia because we were posting near each other this must be the shittiest mafia out there. no mafia would post so obviously allied. and if you look through my previous posts you will see im not exactly buddying celever, ive said he is scummy several times beforehand. in addition ms was also very critical of barty, the fact that you completely exclude him while criticizing me and celever is very scummy, as one poster put it he was "bullying celever" to put barty at l-1. why not even give him a mention? that speaks out to me and i mean ms had multiple posts calling out barty as well- its not like you missed one post he made or something, i count at least a couple
There was already plenty of pressure on barty the beetle at the time Metal Sonic was voting for him. Instead of sharing one of his scum reads and applying pressure on one of them, Metal Sonic voted for someone he claims is probably vanillager and on top of that was already at L-3. He claims that he misworded it but the possibility still exists that it was a scumslip. I still wouldn't say I was "tunneling" Celever, but I already explained this and I'm sorry if it came off like that (looking back I was a little over the top lol). And why don't I get a scum level? :(Houndoomsday said:Spiffy- First thing I notice is that Spiffy doesn't know putting a vote on someone doesn't necessarily mean you want to lynch them, especially in the middle of D1. There were a few other basic logical errors he made which is weird for an experienced player, but it's hard to read too much into that. He handled my suspicions very well, in page 6. He said that him tunneling Celever was okay because it showed people his scumminess, which leaves a weird taste in my mouth, especially considering how he criticized me for tunneling barty. His page 7 posts have been fairly decent, they do a good job of explaining his logic, and calling out other players for either inactivity (which I don't like all that much by themselves, but in a large post I consider fine), or poor posting.
Dude, everyone has said you tunnelled on me, accept it, you were tunnelling.There was already plenty of pressure on barty the beetle at the time Metal Sonic was voting for him. Instead of sharing one of his scum reads and applying pressure on one of them, Metal Sonic voted for someone he claims is probably vanillager and on top of that was already at L-3. He claims that he misworded it but the possibility still exists that it was a scumslip. I still wouldn't say I was "tunneling" Celever, but I already explained this and I'm sorry if it came off like that (looking back I was a little over the top lol). And why don't I get a scum level? :(
Something else I noticed is that you thought barty the beetle was scummy but you think Acklow is town. We have to keep in mind that they share the same player slot, so barty's behavior cannot be completely excused just because Acklow seems village. He is experienced and very capable of fooling us.
Also @Aura Guardian I see you viewing the thread could you clarify on this?Agreeing that Celever's "not your business" thing is suspicious, and I've been suspicious of him otherwise, too.
Ok, we'll agree to disagree. My "tunneling" accomplished what I wanted it to accomplish so call it whatever you want.Dude, everyone has said you tunnelled on me, accept it, you were tunnelling.
I get that he gave his explanation; I am saying that I thought (and still think) it was scummy. I'm not even quite clear what point you're talking about, so would you clarify?Celever said:He has answered it so many times, this is what I meant by repeating things already said or other people have said. Yes, he votes someone he thought was canillager BECAUSE it was a pressure vote, you've done that enough and you explained why pressure lynching was good. He has told you that 2-3 (I forgot) times and STILL you persist on that point.
I am pointing out that barty's behavior (whether you thought he was townie or scummy) cannot be excused just because someone who is tremendously capable of getting himself out of a tough situation (Acklow) subs in. I didn't even ask him a question about this so I don't need an answer lol.Celever said:He said "I am now getting a town read on Acklow and a noob read on Barty" so there you go, you're answer is already there.
I happened to notice the same thing he noticed. Just like how you noticed barty was acting scummy after someone pointed it out to you. There is no difference and nothing wrong with it. Using that logic everyone would be scummy for voting for you because I did it first. Do you feel that way?Celever said:furthermore you just repeated what Houndoomsday said about cxinlee except that you put a lynch on him.
LOL I mentioned you once in that post and it was as an afterthought. You really seem to be grasping at straws to try and make me seem scummy.Celever said:be it due to repeating things you've said again and again, repeating things other people have said in the post before that or STILL tunnelling on me.