Other than the obvious fact that the "most valuable player" must, as a statement of fact, be either the offensive or defensive player of the year (any other player you could possibly mention would have to be inferior to one of those two players, not counting special teams) unless you're one of those losers who think valuable != best, I don't like it when one person wins both awards. :( I mean, you're basically awarding a person twice for one thing. That kinda defeats the purpose of having two separate awards.
And not that I think Bettis is HoF-worthy anyway but I feel like his poor career YPC is partly a product of the role he was asked to play in his offense, a consistent bruiser to pound the rock in obvious short-yardage rushing situations. I mean, if he was an all-time great he'd have broken more big runs or consistently gained a wee bit more and be sitting at a more respectable 4.2-ish YPC but I don't think it proves him bad. He still goes in my Hall of Very Good, I suppose.
WTF R U DOIN DENVER FUCK
EDIT: LOL AGAIN DENVER JESUS CHRIST
And not that I think Bettis is HoF-worthy anyway but I feel like his poor career YPC is partly a product of the role he was asked to play in his offense, a consistent bruiser to pound the rock in obvious short-yardage rushing situations. I mean, if he was an all-time great he'd have broken more big runs or consistently gained a wee bit more and be sitting at a more respectable 4.2-ish YPC but I don't think it proves him bad. He still goes in my Hall of Very Good, I suppose.
WTF R U DOIN DENVER FUCK
EDIT: LOL AGAIN DENVER JESUS CHRIST
Last edited:
