I understand that the french are upset because they're not currently in, however, I think that reversing the decision would be very unfair to my team.
Why couldn't the Afrabs sub in their player earlier? Their two previous players have been extremely inactive and only got 1 game done in 3 weeks. Subbing their player in after the deadline gives France and UK an unfair advantage because everyone knows the Afrabs sub will get all the help in the world from these two teams, alongside his, to play this one game because it's the only one scheduled atm, when if that game was played 24h ago (before the deadline!) nobody on these two teams would have given the slightest fuck about that game.
Furthermore, why would you cancel this activity win just because the score is really close? This doesn't make much sense. If you cancel this win, you also need to cancel a number of them that directly affect the score; such as Light The Thunder vs Felony (the same player!) because his team would be included in the 13-11 tiebreak rather than 5th seed, or given that we lose the game vs Afrabs, Nachos vs fatty because UK would be in the tiebreak off an activity win too. I think that coming back on that decision after the deadline is both extremely unfair to my team and a poor decision because it sets a precedent which means you have to come back on other decisions too to equalize the chances for every team.
I think panamaxis and reyscarface made very good points too, so I'm not going to repeat what they said in this post but I want to highlight the fact that I agree with them.