I'm against using the rohirrim at the moment mostly because of two points:
1. I'm unsure with current activity levels we could force the rohirrim to all vote, and end up as the majority essentially doing nothing but cutting down the mafia's list of targets by a lot(in the current situation people couldn't effectively set up fake rohirrim votes because we'd likely need every fucking one of them to actually get majority on the actual lynch)
2. I haven't been able to put plans into motion yet to consistently cover the tracks of power role voting(if pushed now we'd have a majority of power roles posing as Gondor, which increases the mafia's chances of hitting immensely, okay well more like it depends on the rohirrim votes and stuff, but I'd expect a 1.5* modifier at the moment regardless of the success of the kill+lynch)
I will look more into the way Acklow made his posts to see if the accusations are warranted, but first, back to you LN.
No I didn't just simply say it's not my style, every single argument you bought up against me I countered via proving that your arguments simply don't work, there is nothing subjective about plain unnecessary risks. Let me give you the closest possibly actual reasoning, where I'd potentially kill RODAN, that is actually possible in the current circumstances: RODAN is extremely pushy, got onto my sheet, knew Legolas and wanted both of them to protect an insanely powerful game deciding role that claimed to me and my mafia team has no physical way to block a bodyguard and kill the insanely powerful role instead forcing me to eliminate RODAN because Legolas was protecting him the night in question. See I can do so much better at coming up with a reasonable scenario where bystanders will go "Hmmm yeah that makes sense" than you AND EVEN THAT had to be a ridiculously unbalanced edge case where the mafia has literally no way to bypass a bodyguard even once to kill a role so powerful I can't control it or let it live, also the fact I let myself get pushed around by RODAN but eh that I guess isn't that farfetched.
If we want to simplify anyone's arguments, it'd be yours. They all go roughly like this: "I see BG, I kill BG". I provided countless number of cases in my track record proving that my thought process is neither that simple nor would I be the kind to take risks of that caliber early, anyone in my previous NOC games should know, anyone knowledgeable of the inner workings of the Oligarchy should also know how many times I parroted "We should have lynched aska" and "That doesn't seem like a villagey thing to do...". Regardless of my faction I mention every NOC game how there is no difference between mafia wolf and village wolf, simply because I play a ridiculously provillage mafia. You based so many arguments based on how RODAN may act like you know him like the backside of your hand, yet after providing what I may as well call proof about my mentality you ignore them, and relentlessly attack. If you were merely subjectively believing that RODAN must have claimed to a mafia to die, then you should at the time of admitting that realise that just doesn't work! Not everyone will think like you and even offhand I can come up with silly but more likely reasons for RODAN's death. Someone already mentioned it this day even, someone must really hate Firebot, were their words I believe, mafia having nothing better to do than eliminating the other half of the Firebot Paradox Bros is not as farfetched as me killing RODAN.
So let me summarise the points why I think you are mafia LN, so there is no more left up for debate as to why I'm accusing you: You completely rule out Ullar instantly as to being the perp with the mo because as a sus he got a pref al of being someone RODAN wouldn't claim to, which I'm sorry but it sounds like a complete excuse to SPECIFICALLY focus me down, which you did till called out on it, and proceeded to do the most obvious mafia move in NOC(one of the 50 top obvious moves) "btw this guy is idle LOOK AT HIM!!!!!!!!!!!!". You also ignore everything I say that doesn't suit your argument or say it in a way that makes it look worse, say the whole simplifying what my arguments are. Your entire day has been devoted to the sole purpose of getting me condemned, and everything else an afternote. Even the whole accusing me thing, you constantly dismissed, downplaying your own intent of getting me lynched, which went completely against the whole shelf of new arguments you came up with, leading to some major flipflopping. There is also the whole you knowing RODAN like the backside of your hand basing your accusations on how he'd play like, yet when it comes to how I'd play like you project playstyles similar to your own completely ignoring all that I put down proving my own distinct mentality which seems to be a plain case of hypocrisy or laziness... Yeah this is more of questionable point, but I did basically hand out examples that most people recognise at this point, he'd only have to read my posts and not ignore these points to recognise them, which loops back into ignoring my points where it suits him thing.
Okay now I will look into Acklow, whew
