Hi Antar. Can I request that you include the total weighted Pokemon count (under info tag) in the chaos files? Summing the Pokemon abilities won't work because that assumes every player has a full team of 6. The way I know do this right now is borrowing data from usage TXT, which is annoying and has roundoff errors. Unless there's another way?
-
Welcome to Smogon! Take a moment to read the Introduction to Smogon for a run-down on everything Smogon, and make sure you take some time to read the global rules.
-
Congrats to the winners of the 2023 Smog Awards!
Official Smogon University Usage Statistics Discussion Thread, mk.2
- Thread starter Antar
- Start date
- Status
Antar, there's something with the moveset stats that has bothered me since 2010 or whatever...
Can't those trash EVs be ignored when adding up EV spread usage? It doesn't tell me much when more than half of Landorus-T's EV/Nature spreads are listed as "other".
Code:
| Spreads |
| Jolly:4/252/0/0/0/252 21.407% |
| Jolly:0/252/4/0/0/252 5.973% |
| Adamant:4/252/0/0/0/252 5.933% |
| Impish:252/4/252/0/0/0 5.259% |
| Adamant:252/252/0/0/4/0 5.114% |
| Impish:252/0/240/0/8/8 3.912% |
| Other 52.402% |
Last edited:
What do you mean by "trash EVs?" Do you mean like if someone put in 254 instead of 252? Because I already manually adjust EV spreads to discard unused EVs.
I mean, where the remaining 4 EVs are dumped in the spread. I don't think there's a single pokémon that really cares about whether the EVs are in HP, Def or Sp. Def (at best, people don't put the EVs in HP so the stat isn't divisible by 4). In the example I gave, at least the first two spreads could be fused that way, and maybe the "other" spreads could be trimmed down to a number lower than 52%.
First of all, there's a decent amount of theorymonning behind where the last four EVs go in a lot of cases (important for Life Orb / Leftovers numbers or for optimizing bulk), but I see what you mean. I, at one point, did work on combining similar spreads, but figuring out where to draw the line is annoying (for instance, should Hasty and Naive be combined?). The best solution is probably to change the entire way I report EV spreads and natures and do graphs that show how often each Pokemon runs:
- Max EVs, Boosting nature
- Max EVs, Neutral nature
- Neutral nature, no EVs
- Hindering nature, no EVs
This type of report would be most useful for opposing damage calcs (you see that your attack is a guaranteed KO for 252 Neutral, and that only 12% of that Pokemon run 252+, so you decide to go for it), but the flip side is that it wouldn't be useful at all for building teams (but honestly, if you're using moveset stats rather than analyses to build your teams, I think you have larger problems).
Thoughts?
I agree with MarioWithLasers. As to your solution, while doing graphs would definitely allow for a more complete display of common stats individually, I think it would be worse overall since there's likely no way to show more possibilities without complitcating it too much (for instance, how often does Landorus-T run 88 neutral speed? How about 168 positive?). While it would surely be nice to have alongside the spreads as listed now, I don't think it would be good as a substitution. As to drawing the line, that can be adressed later, as points can be made for both sides in some cases (he naive x hasty thing, for example, has a significant impact on damage calcs); I don't think anyone would disagree with combining two spreads that only differ in 4 Def x 4 SpDef EVs.
I miss my Hackmons statistics. And now since all moveset History is seemingly deleted, there's nothing left of it. I think the remaining 4 ev's ideal is crucial in some cases. I do not like it when I see 84 on all stats with hardy nature however; I've noticed it a few times before.
Hi Antar. In the metagame stats there is a "stallyness" graph. How is that calculated and what exactly does a measure of 1 or -1 means exactly? Also, is there some sort of stallyness calculator that uses the same formula as in the stats that we can plug our teams into? It seems pretty interesting. Thanks.
It's Antar's approximation of how many turns a Pokemon needs to KO itself. A stalliness of 0 is what an "average" Pokemon would score (a 3HKO against itself). A Pokemon expected to nHKO itself has a stalliness of log2(n)-1.58
-1 stalliness = 2^((-1)+1.58) = 2^0.58 = 1.5HKO (quite offensive)
+1 stalliness = 2^(( 1)+1.58) = 2^2.58 = 6HKO (quite defensive)
More detail at http://pokemetrics.wordpress.com and source code - https://github.com/Antar1011/Smogon-Usage-Stats/blob/master/TA.py (to run it you have to set it up yourself)
Stats for December will soon be http://www.smogon.com/stats, but in the meantime, here are some highlights:
OU 1695: http://paste.ubuntu.com/9660540/
UU 1630: http://paste.ubuntu.com/9660556/
RU 1630: http://paste.ubuntu.com/9660562/
NU 1630: http://paste.ubuntu.com/9660563/
PU 1630: http://paste.ubuntu.com/9660565/
Ubers 1630: http://paste.ubuntu.com/9660566/
OU Suspect 1695: http://paste.ubuntu.com/9660572/
Smogon Doubles 1695: http://paste.ubuntu.com/9660574/
LC 1630: http://paste.ubuntu.com/9660581/
Balanced Hackmons 1630: http://paste.ubuntu.com/9660577/
OU 1695: http://paste.ubuntu.com/9660540/
UU 1630: http://paste.ubuntu.com/9660556/
RU 1630: http://paste.ubuntu.com/9660562/
NU 1630: http://paste.ubuntu.com/9660563/
PU 1630: http://paste.ubuntu.com/9660565/
Ubers 1630: http://paste.ubuntu.com/9660566/
OU Suspect 1695: http://paste.ubuntu.com/9660572/
Smogon Doubles 1695: http://paste.ubuntu.com/9660574/
LC 1630: http://paste.ubuntu.com/9660581/
Balanced Hackmons 1630: http://paste.ubuntu.com/9660577/
Last edited:
Thanks so much for bringing back these stats, Antar. They'll be really useful as we move forward.
December's stats for the month are now up! http://www.smogon.com/stats/2014-12/
Thanks for the BH stats 
Doesn't look like they're in this month's stats either.
It seems like Basculin and Basculin-Blue-Striped are combined. They are not just a sprite difference because one ability is different between them. Is this on purpose?
Mostly relevant to the OM below PU: FU.
Mostly relevant to the OM below PU: FU.
Last edited:
Yes, they're combined. Are you telling me they're tiered separately?
I'm saying they should be because they are not the same, just like Gourgeist are not the same, but the difference is just one ability.
The Immortal, this is actually a larger policy decision than I think you realize, so let's table this discussion for this thread.
Xloudman, the hidden power glitch has now been fixed, and I'm redoing December's stats.
Yeah, no--this was due to the Hidden Power glitch. Empty moveslots appear in the stats as "Nothing."
I've fixed the glitches and updated the stats (finally).
Hidden Powers are showing up again, and after some staff discussion, Basculin is going to remain combined (and Pikachus are now combined as well).
Edit: note that there's some BH and Challenge Cup stats missing due to Floette-Eternal-Flower being the longest name on the planet. (done)
Hidden Powers are showing up again, and after some staff discussion, Basculin is going to remain combined (and Pikachus are now combined as well).
Last edited:
We also now have detailed monotype stats, separated out by type. So, for instance, less than 3% of Zapdos run Life Orb on mono-flying teams while almost 10% do on mono-electric.
hi, sorry if this is the wrong place to ask this, but shouldn't keldeo and keldeo-resolute be tiered separately? if we're following the precedent set in-game, there's no way for base-form keld to know secret sword as far as i'm aware (i know that's not how it's implemented on ps! but that's easy enough to change, i presume), and this is a significant enough difference to merit separating them imo.
i'm asking this on the back of the basculin case, obviously, because it's an analogous case.
i'm asking this on the back of the basculin case, obviously, because it's an analogous case.
- Status