Or B/W/2.I loved PokePark as well, I just wish it had a way of sending Pokemon to DPPt or something. Also dat Oshawott...
Or B/W/2.I loved PokePark as well, I just wish it had a way of sending Pokemon to DPPt or something. Also dat Oshawott...
That for Pokepark 2, in my rant I was talking about the first oneOr B/W/2.
I agree with the last part of your statement. If it IS going to have a sequel I would see it being $15. The only reason I loved it was just how hilarious it could be when getting photos. Like how about just hucking apples and pester balls at Pokemon and seeing their reactions. Or playing the Poke Flute and Snorlax jumping up and starting to dance like it was nothing.Pokemon Snap was fine at the height of Pokemania but hasn't aged gracefully. I don't think a Pokemon Snap sequel is a good idea, and if it must be made it should be a $15-dollar download-only title, like Dr Luigi for example.
Disclaimer: I have never played Pokemon Snap.
Though I've only seen one or two fangames/hacks, I have to agree. What some people don't understand about making a game is that just because you think what you made is good doesn't necessarily mean it is. Games hire focus groups and examine previous data and studies them to figure out what the general populous liked and didn't like and then spend many, MANY hours/days/weeks brainstorming what they should keep, change, or experiment with. And the thing is, they know they're not going to please everyone, a business's main goal is to appease the MAJORITY of its TARGETED audience. Sure these fangames/hacks are probably meant for the minority, but the problem is there are so many different minorities it'll probably be only a handful of people you'll appease while others would consider your game just as bland/bad if not worse then the official game.Fangames/Hacks generally have awful design, immature dialogue and plots and just are not fun to play or enjoyable.
The worst ones are the ones who try to be dark and edgy, include random characters from previous games with unrealistic dialog out of nowhere, or just include a self insert rival/villain that is totally marketable and has a connection with a legend and a totally not repetitive back story...Fangames/Hacks generally have awful design, immature dialogue and plots and just are not fun to play or enjoyable.
Very true, but the Vietnamese Bootleg Pokemon Crystal manages to be all that and unintentionally hilarious.Fangames/Hacks generally have awful design, immature dialogue and plots and just are not fun to play or enjoyable.
I agree with this. Sure a lot of them may be complete and total cancer, but they're not taking it away from the real games so I just pretend most of them don't exist.Okay on fan-made games (and this applies more widely than Pokemon):
1) They're available free of charge. Meanwhile there are plenty of terrible $60 games.
2) For me the fan-made game does not exist solely to be a game. It can also just be a pet project for the person who made it, because it is immensely satisfying in any walk of life to have something that took a long time and you did all by yourself.
This is the epitome of unpopular opinions, I love green and hot pink shinies.In my honest opinion, Shiny Pokemon is a useless gimmick added to the Pokemon games. It is only added to make said "Shiny" Pokemon to be aesthetically different from the regular ones while having no influence on its performance in battle whatsoever.
People only like "Shiny" Pokemon because they are rare, and thus highly valued. If you play PvP and happen to encounter several, you can bet that people who have a Shiny team are either ; cheaters (99%) or those who religiously SR and breed (1%). Apparently it's for bragging rights but I don't see what you can brag about when my Gyarados can do the same thing as your hacked or crazily bred Red Gyarados does.
Oh, and did I mention that except for a select few species, "Shiny" Pokemon look horrible? (Weavile and Dragonite, for example)
Some of them are beautiful. Weavile is one of my favorite pink shinies. I also love shiny Honchkrow. I mean, look at it!This is the epitome of unpopular opinions, I love green and hot pink shinies.
It's so fabulous :3,honestly these hot pink shinies scream look at me I'm different. I can't conceive why people hate them.Some of them are beautiful. Weavile is one of my favorite pink shinies. I also love shiny Honchkrow. I mean, look at it!
I completely agree, although I do like some of shiny mons. Blissey and Lanturn for example. I hate it when the shiny version of a mon is entirely pink/green/blue.In my honest opinion, Shiny Pokemon is a useless gimmick added to the Pokemon games. It is only added to make said "Shiny" Pokemon to be aesthetically different from the regular ones while having no influence on its performance in battle whatsoever.
People only like "Shiny" Pokemon because they are rare, and thus highly valued. If you play PvP and happen to encounter several, you can bet that people who have a Shiny team are either ; cheaters (99%) or those who religiously SR and breed (1%). Apparently it's for bragging rights but I don't see what you can brag about when my Gyarados can do the same thing as your hacked or crazily bred Red Gyarados does.
Oh, and did I mention that except for a select few species, "Shiny" Pokemon look horrible? (Weavile and Dragonite, for example)
Not only that but they have odd level curves, complicated maps, and very weird distribution of Pokemon.Fangames/Hacks generally have awful design, immature dialogue and plots and just are not fun to play or enjoyable.
I guess I'm that 1%. I religiously MM shinies and then build a team around it. My Gourgeist, Aegislash, Garchomp, and Pidgeot are examples. Gourgeist and Aegislash I liked the colors. Garchomp I got a shiny Gible in a trade in Gen IV and it ended up being my MVP so I wanted one I know wasn't hacked. Pidgeot was because of my old and terrible fanfic I wrote featured a shiny Pidgey that my friends found online and we just had a good laugh at my terrible writing, so I wanted to honor it. Or sometimes (like my Minccino, Archen, Klink, Scyther, and Hawlucha) my shinies were happy accidents.In my honest opinion, Shiny Pokemon is a useless gimmick added to the Pokemon games. It is only added to make said "Shiny" Pokemon to be aesthetically different from the regular ones while having no influence on its performance in battle whatsoever.
People only like "Shiny" Pokemon because they are rare, and thus highly valued. If you play PvP and happen to encounter several, you can bet that people who have a Shiny team are either ; cheaters (99%) or those who religiously SR and breed (1%). Apparently it's for bragging rights but I don't see what you can brag about when my Gyarados can do the same thing as your hacked or crazily bred Red Gyarados does.
Oh, and did I mention that except for a select few species, "Shiny" Pokemon look horrible? (Weavile and Dragonite, for example)
I just like to have my main Pokemon be shiny, sort of to make it stand out. SV hatching made this very easyI guess I'm that 1%. I religiously MM shinies and then build a team around it. My Gourgeist, Aegislash, Garchomp, and Pidgeot are examples. Gourgeist and Aegislash I liked the colors. Garchomp I got a shiny Gible in a trade in Gen IV and it ended up being my MVP so I wanted one I know wasn't hacked. Pidgeot was because of my old and terrible fanfic I wrote featured a shiny Pidgey that my friends found online and we just had a good laugh at my terrible writing, so I wanted to honor it. Or sometimes (like my Minccino, Archen, Klink, Scyther, and Hawlucha) my shinies were happy accidents.
I do get why people don't like it. Some of them are just fugly. And to be fair, finding a team of all shinies (especially legendaries) is very suspect. I might just do it though now that I have enough...
That... that looks horrific. The colours clash horribly and the pink is far too bright to be legalSome of them are beautiful. Weavile is one of my favorite pink shinies. I also love shiny Honchkrow. I mean, look at it!
I actually like it. The way the colors clash produce a majestic marker to show off that it's not just a Honchkrow, it's the HonchkrowThat... that looks horrific. The colours clash horribly and the pink is far too bright to be legal
If shinies actually did anything in battle people would just complain about the unfair advantage and how you have to hack have a viable team. Right now they are just a feature to add replay value to the game for collectors and I quite like that.In my honest opinion, Shiny Pokemon is a useless gimmick added to the Pokemon games. It is only added to make said "Shiny" Pokemon to be aesthetically different from the regular ones while having no influence on its performance in battle whatsoever.
People only like "Shiny" Pokemon because they are rare, and thus highly valued. If you play PvP and happen to encounter several, you can bet that people who have a Shiny team are either ; cheaters (99%) or those who religiously SR and breed (1%). Apparently it's for bragging rights but I don't see what you can brag about when my Gyarados can do the same thing as your hacked or crazily bred Red Gyarados does.
Oh, and did I mention that except for a select few species, "Shiny" Pokemon look horrible? (Weavile and Dragonite, for example)