I would preferred if the Round of 16 had the top four winners were rewarded with the 4 best 3rd placed teams and the rest randomized, but since the argument is about entertainment the article states that you need at least 3 points to advance to knock out stages, and seeing how achieving 3 points from draw is unrealistic and how closely fought the matches were (I wouldn't call Romania vs. France or Swedish vs. Ireland, Albania vs. Swiss, etc. boring) I don't think that group stages would necessarily be dull.Because there are only 4 third placed teams, and there are 6 group winners. It would better if the Round of 16 was randomized, but it still makes for an unfair, and not very exciting Group Stage. The Eurocup Group Stage has usually been highly entertaining because it was ''stacked'' and good teams were eliminated, as only 50% of the teams could advance. However, the 24-team format means that 75% percent of the teams qualify, so the group stage is very dull, as the stakes are very low.
The ''best thirds'' rule also means that the best strategy for most teams is just to draw all their matches or to win one and then try to ''not lose by much'':
Also read:
http://www.espnfc.com/european-cham...make-euro-2016-group-stage-a-defensive-battle
Also lol Belgium, way to offset England's last minute fall.