It wasn't a double target, that would have made me very happy indeed.That's not true. The double target last night means we only need to hit a scum.
Vote BlazadeIt wasn't a double target, that would have made me very happy indeed.
Trusting you billyThat's not true. The double target last night means we only need to hit a scum.
He's not trying to see reactions he wants jalmont dead lol.Could Blazade have bussed Jalmont to see reactions or was he going for the mislynch on town?
Uhh, the whole twin scenario doesn't clean you as far as I'm aware. It's entirely possible that twin did try to kill you twice and failed (afaik). I presume he probably flipped roles given that there was talk about voting a neutral off over a mafia prior to him claiming bad.Are we seriously on me being scum after the whole twin scenario? Where he flipped Broly after claiming I was Broly? Jalmont gut reactioned complaining that he didn't get to claim but as the chips settled the inly realistic claim for him was Buu. Funny how that works, now that the counterclaim is scummy becuase it wastes an info role claim he shifts his tune to "I would do what I'm doing now anyway"
You and I think billy have said that King_ has softclaimed watcher, but I don't see it anymore. What I also don't see is where I've indicated that I believe it. If King_ had done so that I wouldn't and do not believe it and that would tell me that King_ is probably scum.But you appear to believe King's watcher soft which wouldn't be true if you were watcher yourself. I don't think you compete with Yeti or Asek for Crier, JOAT respectively. You claiming tracker would be far less believable than Billy considering how King_ never challenged Billy's knowledge of his target and instead fit himself into the only believable scenario given that information.
As everything settles Jalmont being good gets harder and harder to justify objectively, and I committed to this before all this information overload.