Discussion
Question 1: Should the proposed rules be approved of?
a) Yes
b) No, because of XXXX
Question 2: For how long should the current white-listed refs have their licenses extended until they apply under new rules?
a) 2 months
b) 3 months
c) 4 months
d) 5 months
e) 6 months
f) No time at all
Someoneelse / Ooraloo / Maxim / Mowtom / Exclaimer / FMD
Rules:
1) The White-Listing process is to be conducted by the Reffing Mentorship program.
2) To be White-Listed the candidate must be a Registered Ref, prove that they is capable of reffing decently and that they had done their share of reffing for the community on the previous two months.
3) The Candidate fills in a form and signs up to be evaluated by a Reffing Tutor. The candidate joins the specific queue and can be picked by any of the reffing tutors, as well as the manager. Each tutor/manager can be in charge of only one evaluation at a time and must finish the one they picked before picking any other.
4) Once the tutor responsable for the evalution is decided upon, the candidate has one week to PM the tutor all the battles they have reffed or are reffing two months prior from the signup moment. The candidate must PM all of them and any sign of sugarpicking may result in disqualification.
5) The tutor evaluates each of those matches analysing mostly the calcs done (they should be mostly correctly), the rulings made (they should be either according to NDA/Handbook or, if not clear enough on the rules, they must have proper justification) as well as the overall format (Pokemon Summary, calcs etc in a clean fashion). Each battle deemed acceptable (not necessarily 100% perfect, merely acceptable for the purposes of the game) is awarded a certain amount of points, according to a point-conversion table to be determined by the managership according to the following order: Flash<<Battle Tower<Facilities (Pike, Hall, Sim)<Mentorship battles<Gym = Tournament<<Tournament Semifinals or Finals<<<<<TLR = Raid. Bigger battles are awarded more points and battles with good not-merely-tacked-on-to-get-extra-points flavor (subjective) will also net extra points. Ongoing matches or matches that ended in DQ will be awarded partial points based on the point they were at (1/4, 1/2, 3/4 or 1/1 the number of points of the full thing) (subjective analysis of the tutor). The tutor has 2 weeks to give a result.
6) To be white-listed, the player will need to achieve a specific number of points.
7) Excepcionally, The tutor may propose the manager to grant white-listing without the number of points or to reject it even with the number of points necessary. In both cases, the final decision is of the Manager.
8) Once white-listed, the license is valid for 6 months. Nearing the end of it (2 months before the expiration date is the earliest moment possible for this), the candidate should restart the process to renew it.
9) In case of rejection, the candidate must wait one month before trying again.
10) Each analysis, once done, is to be posted in its entirety on the main topic for data keeping and is awarded 5UC. The decision made by the tutor is not up for reviewing and any candidate may choose to not want a specific tutor to handle their application.
11) All current white-listed players have their licenses valid for 3 extra months, starting from the moment this proposal was approved of, before they need to renew them.
1) The White-Listing process is to be conducted by the Reffing Mentorship program.
2) To be White-Listed the candidate must be a Registered Ref, prove that they is capable of reffing decently and that they had done their share of reffing for the community on the previous two months.
3) The Candidate fills in a form and signs up to be evaluated by a Reffing Tutor. The candidate joins the specific queue and can be picked by any of the reffing tutors, as well as the manager. Each tutor/manager can be in charge of only one evaluation at a time and must finish the one they picked before picking any other.
4) Once the tutor responsable for the evalution is decided upon, the candidate has one week to PM the tutor all the battles they have reffed or are reffing two months prior from the signup moment. The candidate must PM all of them and any sign of sugarpicking may result in disqualification.
5) The tutor evaluates each of those matches analysing mostly the calcs done (they should be mostly correctly), the rulings made (they should be either according to NDA/Handbook or, if not clear enough on the rules, they must have proper justification) as well as the overall format (Pokemon Summary, calcs etc in a clean fashion). Each battle deemed acceptable (not necessarily 100% perfect, merely acceptable for the purposes of the game) is awarded a certain amount of points, according to a point-conversion table to be determined by the managership according to the following order: Flash<<Battle Tower<Facilities (Pike, Hall, Sim)<Mentorship battles<Gym = Tournament<<Tournament Semifinals or Finals<<<<<TLR = Raid. Bigger battles are awarded more points and battles with good not-merely-tacked-on-to-get-extra-points flavor (subjective) will also net extra points. Ongoing matches or matches that ended in DQ will be awarded partial points based on the point they were at (1/4, 1/2, 3/4 or 1/1 the number of points of the full thing) (subjective analysis of the tutor). The tutor has 2 weeks to give a result.
6) To be white-listed, the player will need to achieve a specific number of points.
7) Excepcionally, The tutor may propose the manager to grant white-listing without the number of points or to reject it even with the number of points necessary. In both cases, the final decision is of the Manager.
8) Once white-listed, the license is valid for 6 months. Nearing the end of it (2 months before the expiration date is the earliest moment possible for this), the candidate should restart the process to renew it.
9) In case of rejection, the candidate must wait one month before trying again.
10) Each analysis, once done, is to be posted in its entirety on the main topic for data keeping and is awarded 5UC. The decision made by the tutor is not up for reviewing and any candidate may choose to not want a specific tutor to handle their application.
11) All current white-listed players have their licenses valid for 3 extra months, starting from the moment this proposal was approved of, before they need to renew them.
Question 1: Should the proposed rules be approved of?
a) Yes
b) No, because of XXXX
Question 2: For how long should the current white-listed refs have their licenses extended until they apply under new rules?
a) 2 months
b) 3 months
c) 4 months
d) 5 months
e) 6 months
f) No time at all
Someoneelse / Ooraloo / Maxim / Mowtom / Exclaimer / FMD
