Quote:
|
only a very select few people would have influence in the decision
|
And the problem is? It wouldn't be accurate? Wrong. For all intents and purposes, it'd be very accurate because these "select few people" are a very good representation of what's best combined with what's most current. Even if it wasn't, then it could still be changed. That's the point. We're not making anything concrete. In fact, this is nothing more than another change. Players years from now can make more changes.
The point is, the list today is inaccurate. It's outdated. I want to update it. havoc wants to update it (at least I think he does). That's the point.
Quote:
|
then decisions would be narrowed down to effectively Theorymoning what would be good based on past experiences.
|
"Past" in this case would be "current". GSC hasn't changed from what I left it (anyone is free to correct me if I'm wrong in ANY part of this declaration).
And once you're experienced and stupidly knowledgeable about the game to a certain point, it's a step passed theorymoning. It's knowing.
Again, no one here is able to make concrete arguments (e.g. singling out a specific pokemon and saying "that doesn't belong there"). These general formalities are a weak argument to begin win, and a bitch to confirm/deny. Stop making them.