Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat UncleSam
I don't like this solution much wickdaggler, as I believe one of the decisions during the last rule-changing process was that it is difficult to simply classify each player based on what anyone thinks of him.
|
Well, not just quite anybody, but I can see your point here; players will be judged quite possibly unfairly because of public image.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat UncleSam
Also, it is necessary for Expert games to be totally handpicked, and I believe 5 reserves for a Standard game is also too few.
|
First off, only experienced players could apply in the first place, and about half of the players would be handpicked, although an increase by 5 reserves for each level would be reasonable.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat UncleSam
The only thing I like about your system is that it restricts hosts to being competent mafia players, but the Moderators already do this to some extent,
|
oh?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat UncleSam
although I would like to see somewhat more stringent guidelines on who can host or not, as there have been a lot of...questionable games lately.
|
Yeah, I think this would solve the problem tbh :\
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat UncleSam
Again, this hosting problem stems from the Expert system as well, and I think would be solved if we incorporated the changes I suggest. If we fix the hosting problem, it will fix the player pool problem and the quality of play problem. Everyone wins, it seems to me.
|
I agree, your system would work very well... I just proposed a slightly different way of handling things...
I guess we'll see which system works through public opinion and trial and error...