Originally Posted by Fat MajorGambit
We're coming to the 4th page and most of you guys still haven't got the main point. The main point is not the flaws the battle had, but the fact that in order posts of less experienced players many raters go and and crucify the guy for the same mistakes that are present here.
However, in this warstory people ignore the same points they claim to be so important and give an almost flawless rate (8, 9 even 10). This simply does not make sense and creates an environment of prejudice against less experienced players.
If you guys still think I'm a pure hater a can quote other posts slaming guys for a battle full of misplays, hax and lack of percentages and also the rate that was given.
Quite MajorGambit. To those posting to express their views that those complaining about the warstory were unjustified, please read through the whole conversation before doing so and you will see that this is not the case, and that Chou agrees with the above post to some extent - namely about prejudice towards warstory writers.