Originally Posted by Fat jrrrrrrr
I'm aware of that but that won't stop accusations of bias, and there's no way to prove it one way or the other.
This is absolutely correct. And expanding on this point: the accusation of bias we might receive after introducing paragraphs could be even heavier considering that some of the users who would be judging them aren't exactly neutral to some controversial Pokemon\abilities currently deemed "suspect".
In my opinion the voting process should be 100% objective and only subject to the achievement of a given rating.
As for blind nomination, I'm fine with those but still, if a Pokemon\ability gets voted OU twice in a row people should not be able to nominate it again, unless in the previous round we ban something that can potentially have a huge impact on the status of that Pokemon\ability.