Ok so this, to be honest, rather silly. I'm going to say that:
1. It's too early to reject Gardevoir because I haven't tested her yet (and, I suspect, neither has either of you). I fully intend to test her, I just haven't done it yet. Until then, this thread is more a placeholder than anything else (hence the QC 0/0 tag).
2. You say neither of these sets "warrant usage" or "are just awful" and yet do not say why. I don't see how they are awful or do not warrant usage. If I did, I wouldn't even have made this thread.
3. PK Gaming claims the sets are outclassed when I don't see any other Pokemon that can do what she does (well, Smeargle).
If you guys are rejecting this based on theory, I'll want to see why. If you're rejecting this based on experience, I'd appreciate some description of what actually happened in a game. Until then, I'll say your rejections are premature.
Half the people on this forum are extremely rude in-game. If you believe in politeness both in-battle and outside it, put this in your signature.
UU Warstory: What do I do next?