View Single Post
Old Oct 9th, 2011, 1:02:59 PM   #10
Banedon
 
Banedon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 903
Default

Personally, I'm for placeholders of this type but against placeholders that just say "placeholder".

I think a detailed placeholder, like the one I created for Gardevoir, helps a lot with forming a good analysis. There I for example kept a list of all the moves that make Gardevoir unique, and listed down sets that (theoretically) have potential. If someone else were using Gardevoir too, he'd have a natural place to post his results as well, especially if he used one of the sets I theorycrafted.

A placeholder that just says "placeholder" though is still useful to some extent, but personally I would want to see a lot more effort on the OP's part before participating. One-liners may be quick to read, but they don't generate discussion.
__________________
Half the people on this forum are extremely rude in-game. If you believe in politeness both in-battle and outside it, put this in your signature.

UU Warstory: What do I do next?
Banedon is offline   Reply With Quote