Not really a grammar controversy. However, I've recently noticed that a lot of GP checkers have been checking analyses which are lacking in description. IMO unless there are at least 2 full paragraphs for each set, it isn't descriptive enough for set purposes. Two 3 sentence "paragraphs" per set just doesn't cut it, because the people who actually use these analyses, usually newer players, need to actually know how each set works. A number of sets basically say "these are 4 moves, these are other options, this is how to EV it". I think we should set a content minimum.
|