[Jalmont]

Originally Posted by Fat pokémaniac 212

I've read through EP's posts this phase, and to be fair to him his defence does make sense, and he raises some very valid points about AG, the one about him being hooked by a mafia hooker etc I hadn't personally considered. Therefore, while some suspicions of him remain to me, he's no longer top of my suspicious list. Because of this, while I think Jalmont has come across as town, its not enough to outweigh the significant suspicions of AG. Therefore unvote, Lynch Jalmont

As for pernicious I have nothing against a vote on him, and would change should the consensus be to vote pernicious, its simply that I think there is solid suspicion against Jalmont, whereas for pernicious it is simply constant inactivity.

what
I come across as town, but you still want to lynch me anyways...
Please explain how this works. You don't mention anything about Pernicious and his post, but I should apparently be lynched because AG acted scummy even though you say I come across as town.

Originally Posted by Fat Quagsires

I did to the second and third part, backing down on the second due to realizing the logic was faulty for reasons you did not state, and as for the third, It's not anti-town at all, in fact I think it will help us if he has a trustable role and its unfair for us not to know that he's deliberately hiding something yet not willing to specify what, not to mention looking like he has no idea what to claim and is mafia to me. Otherwise I agree, he looks somewhat town, but the role part and the inactivity I believe is enough to warrant a possible lynch.

And it's not up to me to determine the first part, I believe the nightkill is reliable enough for it to be warranted, however, why assume my decision is binding? If others disagree, let him die. I really do not care unless he comes to defend himself. No sane BG will protect him, and the only possible reason for failure is a mafia hooker or prio, unless they completely disagree with what seems to be a common belief.

And I will say I expect everyone to contribute the same and only take the fact that someone is new into account when they fail to do so, since they have just as equal odds of being mafia as anyone else. Anything else is a fallacy, even if they fail to post with quality. Heck, using experience here is a fallacy, as you assume I am smarter and better than everyone else when I am not only not the most experienced, but also have quite imperfect luck, not to mention some people do really well their first games.

Anything else?

Hello could you please explain why you had two differing opinions on pokemaniac. I didn't see you address this so please explain. Pokemaniac looks scummy but then he looks clean?