[Borat]

Originally Posted by Fat M Dragon

Point was that T-tar, Zapdos, Gengar and Starm have been top ou in the 4 gens, while DP lax is just bad.
This is all very subjective though, because while zapdos, gengar and starm have been "good" in all 4 gens, Snorlax has been really good in gens 1, 2 and 3.

T-Tar, Zapdos, Gengar and Starm have been more consistent, but it's true that nothing has dominated as much as GSC lax, but t-tar has dominated gens 3 and 4, and it's very good in gsc (I agree with Borat adv Lax is probably as good as gsc T-tar), but it didn't exist in RBY.

So the question basically is, whats more dominant, a pokemon that has been top OU in every gen (except in 1 because it didnt exist), or a pokemon that has been top OU in every gen except in 1, because it wasnt nearly as good.

T-tar and Lax should be in the top 2 positions, no doubt about that.
Zapdos is maybe #3

How would you rank RBY lax vs DP ttar?