View Single Post
Old Sep 24th, 2012, 3:47:29 PM   #29
vonFiedler
 
vonFiedler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,157
Default

It seems a lot of people are saying that No Guard isn't risky because it removes the chance of missing with attacks. Well, have you forgotten that we don't want luck based risk? No Guard isn't all that risky on an extremely bulky mon like Machamp with a very abusive STAB for it, but I really like the idea of a pokemon with average or even less bulk carrying it. I'm not gonna jump to say that's how we should go with CAP4, but right now I like it the most and arguments against it fly in the face of the concept.
__________________
I will always go to sleep, even in a house where I just murdered a couple of cops. - Lightwolf
vonFiedler is offline