Originally Posted by Fat RaikouLover
This is piss-poor logic. My semi-stall teams are actually rather weak to Taunt SD Gliscor. Most stall is. It also doubles as a Tank and Lucario check. Some people would like that other than having Gliscor be a non-threatening punching bag. Give it Poison heal and you have a check to Breloom, Lucario, and Conkeldurr with the ability to sweep. If it is a win-win why scrap it?!?!?! Usage isn't supposed to determine what gets analysis and what does not. People refer to analysis to USE the pokemon -___-
The thing is that stall teams are not so common, and even then, there are better stallbreakers than Gliscor. Defensive Gliscor is straight up better against offensive and balanced teams than stallbreaker as it can actually wall Terrakion and has one more moveslot, which he needs. If stall was more common then it could get a set, but the metagame is still quite offensive for it to warrant a set imo. I am not saying that stall is non existent, just that it is not common either, so having a set that it's only selling point over other Gliscor sets is the ability to beat stall (which it doesn't even do easily as many stall teams have answers against it) doesn't seem right. OO or AC in any other set is fine.