http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wi..._do_not_evolve
Oh, I love Bulbapedia.
Gen I: 151 new pokémon, 7 (4.636%) with no family, 5 (3.311%) legendary. 7.947% in Gen I, 7.947% in total.
Gen II: 100 new pokémon, 12 (12%) with no family, 6 (6%) legendary. 18% in Gen II, 11.952% in total.
Gen III: 135 new pokémon, 18 (13.333%) with no family, 10 (7.407%) legendary. 20.74% in Gen III, 15.025% in total.
Gen IV: 107 new pokémon, 5 (4.673%) with no family, 14 (13.084%) legendary. 17.757% in Gen IV, 15.619% in total.
Gen V: 156 new pokémon, 14 (8.974%) with no family, 13 (8.333%) legendary. 17.308% in Gen V, 16.026% in total.
16%? That's a lot, considering Rowan's talk. I blame the legendaries.
FUCK THEM
Gen I: 146 new pokémon, 7 (4.795%) with no family. 4.795% in total.
Gen II: 94 new pokémon, 12 (12.766%) with no family. 7.917% in total.
Gen III: 125 new pokémon, 18 (14.4%) with no family. 10.137% in total.
Gen IV: 93 new pokémon, 5 (5.376%) with no family. 9.17% in total.
Gen V: 143 new pokémon, 14 (9.79%) with no family. 9.318% in total.
...Ok fuck this. I shouldn't blame the legendaries.
So, let's say Gen VI will have 128 new pokémon (just so the last one will be #777, derp), 12 of them legendaries. If they want to FINALLY fix the 10% number, then we'll either have 77 no-family pokémon (10% of 777, counting legendaries), or 71 (10% of 717, no legendaries). In the former, we already have 104; in the latter... 56. Hm. So, considering we're expecting 12 legendaries, we'd be getting 15 new evos in the former... and lol -15 evos in the latter, that is, 15 new standalone pokémon and ZERO new evos.
I don't know about you, but I follow the school of thought that teaches Rowan was counting the legendaries on his studies.
And Jesus, I got outsped TWICE. And not even on this page.