|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: which secondary ability? | |||
| No Secondary Ability |
|
90 | 56.60% |
| Shockproof |
|
45 | 28.30% |
| No Guard |
|
24 | 15.09% |
| Voters: 159. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#26 | |
|
It's only after we've lost everything that we're free to do anything.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,230
Home: Goshen Scout Reservation
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
maybe I just misunderstood
![]() ![]() ![]()
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,695
|
NSA again.
Not everything we make has to have ability's that let it do different things. We have made 5 Pokemon that can run a highly effective "novelty" set due to a secondary ability (check them). That's ok, but lets give it a break for this one.
__________________
For people who like storing things: The Box Reading and LC? LCF, LC Guide, LC Analyses Good channels: #littlecup, #C&C, #1v1, others And for SCMS editors: SCMS group |
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
It's only after we've lost everything that we're free to do anything.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,230
Home: Goshen Scout Reservation
|
| Syclant | Ability | Mountaineer | 68.2 |
| Syclant | Ability | Compoundeyes | 31.8 | | Revenankh | Ability | Shed Skin | 88.5 | | Revenankh | Ability | Air Lock | 11.5 | | Pyroak | Ability | Battle Armor | 91.3 | | Pyroak | Ability | Rock Head | 8.7 | | Fidgit | Ability | Vital Spirit | 72.3 | | Fidgit | Ability | Persistent | 27.7 | | Stratagem | Ability | Technician | 52.7 | | Stratagem | Ability | Levitate | 47.3 | Only 2 out of the 5 I would call "novelty' |
|
|
|
|
#29 |
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,290
33 / 38 / 28
|
That merely backs up his argument, we have created many Pokemon that have the ability to do something else, and like you showed RB some of them have proved not to be "novelty" at all and have proved to actually have some competitive use. This doesn't need a secondary ability, it has one job to do and that is counter many threats, why you we then assign it another job.
__________________
Possibly the most interesting thread on Smogon.Bored of having to type coherantly? <LegacyRaider> it just feels nice to be able to whack that thing lol FRIGGIN IDIOTS OF A NATIONS If you are where I am, I'll give you my crsid and we can go to a pub or something :) I make music, please take a listen if you are that way inclined. Here is my Soundcloud and my Youtube. |
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,317
Guam
|
I voted No Guard
the only reason i see this getting NSA is because we can give it a new ability when gen 5 rolls about or something I cant help but feel that most of the people voting NSA are only doing it because its the popular choice it by no means adds anything competitively to leave it with NSA why do we feel like we have to limit it to unaware only? who said this poke has to have only 1 job? aren't we centralizing zapdos even more with this poke? |
|
|
|
|
#31 | |
|
It's only after we've lost everything that we're free to do anything.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,230
Home: Goshen Scout Reservation
|
Quote:
And i didn't prove his point. If an ability used by more than 25%, then i doubt it qualifies as a "novelty set" |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,290
33 / 38 / 28
|
You didn't directly prove his point, he was saying that:
Quote:
__________________
Possibly the most interesting thread on Smogon.Bored of having to type coherantly? <LegacyRaider> it just feels nice to be able to whack that thing lol FRIGGIN IDIOTS OF A NATIONS If you are where I am, I'll give you my crsid and we can go to a pub or something :) I make music, please take a listen if you are that way inclined. Here is my Soundcloud and my Youtube. |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | ||||||||||||||
|
You and I Know
![]() ![]() ![]()
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,543
San Diego, CA
|
OK, I'm voting Shockproof. It gives this guy the ability to be a decent check on Zapdos, since with Special Defense investment he will be able to take thunderbolts like a champ. Many of the other top threats can be beaten just with his typing anyway, so if you have a need to beat Zapdos then you can go for this ability!
No Guard seems to turn it away from "checks the top five" and into "annoys the hell out of OU with STAB Dynamicpunch and 100% acc Hydro Pump." It probably wouldn't be overpowered, but it doesn't really fit the theme, and I think we could all do without an additional luck insertion via Dynamicpunch. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
...said the Mock Turtle, "why, if a fish came to me, and told me he was going a journey, I should say 'With what porpoise?'" "Don't you mean 'purpose'?" said Alice. "I mean what I say," the Mock Turtle replied in an offended tone. And the Gryphon added `Come, let's hear some of your adventures.' |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#34 |
![]() Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,829
Scotland- GMT+0
|
TAY, Dynamicpunch isn't guaranteed on its movepool. I think most people are sensible enough to realise how annoying this thing would be if it gets No Guard and Dynamicpunch, so if it does get that ability chances are Dynamicpunch will be voted out.
The other benefits of No Guard, namely allowing it to use Cross Chop or Hi Jump Kick over Brick Break (since Close Combat is bad because of lowered defenses), and allowing it to use Hydro Pump / Blizzard, mean that it can have some offensive capabilities instead of just walling the top 5. However, like I've pointed out before, No Guard is great in that it checks itself. Sure, CAP6 can throw around some high powered moves. But its foes can do the same. The only real drawbacks of moves like Fire Blast and Stone Edge are their low pp and accuracy, and when they are always guaranteed to hit CAP6 , they will start to leave a mark despite its resistances. Also, moves like Sing, Will-O-Wisp and Thunder will also hit it with full accuracy, allowing it to be crippled so much more easily. In the end, No Guard will be an inferior defensive ability to Unaware. The benefits of ignoring your opponent's stat boosts are too good to pass up on a defensive pokemon, and so almost all defensively based CAP6 will choose to run Unaware. However, I think it is important that people still have the choice to use No Guard. It is by no means a 'gimmick' - it would be of great benefit to more offensively inclined sets. LR.
__________________
Warstories: UU Deathmatch (A) | Raining on the Parade | The Great War Breaching the Fortress (A) | UU - Dodging Bullets (A) | Mushroom Warfare (OU Warstory) (A) |
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
You and I Know
![]() ![]() ![]()
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,543
San Diego, CA
|
You are correct in that it is not guaranteed to get Dynamicpunch, and upon further consideration, I think No Guard would be a great ability. However, I still think shockproof would be better, since it more directly applies to "checking the top five pokemon" as opposed to "being really helpful in general."
__________________
...said the Mock Turtle, "why, if a fish came to me, and told me he was going a journey, I should say 'With what porpoise?'" "Don't you mean 'purpose'?" said Alice. "I mean what I say," the Mock Turtle replied in an offended tone. And the Gryphon added `Come, let's hear some of your adventures.' |
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 935
Granada, Spain
|
My problem with Shockproof, and why I voted No Secondary, is that this is one of the cases that just having both abilities available benefits it, even if it can only choose one. If I'm using shockproof instead of Unaware, I could switch into one of the pokémon that would defeat CAP6 after a stat up, and make them run away because I switched on their stat up, so they think I have unaware and they run away. Then they switch Zapdos in, only to be fucked when their TB does crap damage and I reply back with Stone Edge/Avalance, or something like that. Sure, the trick is discovered by then, but their Zapdos is now dead or badly wounded, and the stat upper ran away without having to. Now if they want to come back, they won't have the leisure of a stat up on the switch, so CAP6 still retains the advantage.
I just want people to be aware that is is only running unaware, so there's no uncertainty regarding what it counters and what can counter it.
__________________
D/P FC: 2749 8421 3675 |
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 111
|
I don't see the point of Shockproof to counter Zapdos. Shockproof DOES NOT make the Fisher resistant to Electric attacks. It takes half of a 2x Super Effective Electric attack, or simply just a neutral attack. I wouldn't want to eat a STAB Thunderbolt from 125 SpA, weakness or neutral. Unaware is just a plain better option over Shockproof, so why bother with another option? Set up Pokemon are much more dangerous than Zapdos now.
__________________
It's all Swell... Oh! - RMT Completed: Vaporeon, Froslass "Justice will prevail! ... Just kidding." |
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,591
^ brought to you by Cartoons!
|
Time Mage - That is exactly why I voted shockproof. Among other reasons already stated, but oh well looks like a lost cause =/
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | ||
|
It's only after we've lost everything that we're free to do anything.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,230
Home: Goshen Scout Reservation
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
You and I Know
![]() ![]() ![]()
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,543
San Diego, CA
|
Time Mage, I'm sure you are aware that that is the exact situation that Bronzong is in. And is that a bad thing? Though you never really made it clear why this is bad, I'm assuming that your qualm with it is that it introduces more luck into the game. And while this is generally a bad thing, there is an obvious risk and downside to hoping your opponent switches out, since thinking you are unaware. A risk vs reward situation is very different from simply adding more luck into the game.
Honestly I don't see how your situation is any different from sending out non-scarf heatran against Lucario or infernape, or non-scarf Heracross against Ambipom or something. There is also the risk of you misplaying since you assume that your opponent will not call your bluff. As for Yoki, just because it isn't resistant doesn't mean it cannot counter it. As a comparison, even Machamp (assuming a hefty HP / SpDef investment) is usually 4HKOd by defensive Zapdos' Thunderbolt, and 3HKO'd by an offensive one. So if it could switch in and threaten significant damage then it will certainly be a check, if not an outright counter.
__________________
...said the Mock Turtle, "why, if a fish came to me, and told me he was going a journey, I should say 'With what porpoise?'" "Don't you mean 'purpose'?" said Alice. "I mean what I say," the Mock Turtle replied in an offended tone. And the Gryphon added `Come, let's hear some of your adventures.' Last edited by TAY; Dec 12th, 2008 at 4:28:38 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 935
Granada, Spain
|
Oh, it is good. That is my problem: It is TOO GOOD. As I said, I want it to be a clear counter for what it counters normally... And be clearly countered, as well.
But of course it's good. It just happens that I think it's too much.
__________________
D/P FC: 2749 8421 3675 |
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,591
^ brought to you by Cartoons!
|
If people abuse it too much, it's going to lose the surprise factor, and there's at least one reason to use Unaware regardless of surprise factor, and that's rev, who probably won't be forced out until he's sure his boosts are missing
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
It's only after we've lost everything that we're free to do anything.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,230
Home: Goshen Scout Reservation
|
How does it make it too good? Just writing it in caps doesn't make your point. I've only seen people claim "it won't matter" this is the first time someone has said "this is too good" and i would like to see why you think that
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 935
Granada, Spain
|
I already explained it: It makes what can counter it impossible to know at first. I'm pretty worried that this pokémon may end up being too powerful, and instead of just countering/checking the majority of the top 5 (remember, the majority, it's fine to be countered by Zapdos, since it stops cold 3 of them and goes even with Revenankh), it may end up being powerful enough to be itself a centralizing force.
That's why I made its Special Attack stat unusable in my spread, and that's why I want it to just have Unaware as an ability: I want its weakness to be that it is fairly predictable.
__________________
D/P FC: 2749 8421 3675 |
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
I'm...feeling...faint...
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,228
|
I have said this before in the previous poll, and I will say it again. I think voting No Secondary ability is, at least in my opinion, a rather irresponsible thing to do, considering that the concept is "decentralizer". Whether the ability is Shockproof, No Guard... anything else, we should be allowing our creation to better fulfill our concept rather than wasting our vote on "No Secondary Ability". I will agree that Unaware was the best ability for this concept by far, but that doesn't mean that we shouldn't incorporate a second ability.
I voted Shockproof. Yes, you can argue that this ability is somewhat contrived to help our pokemon against Zapdos (And Rotom by extension), but you can't argue that it isn't decentralizing. For those that are, tell me this. If we don't give our Pokemon Shockproof, how will Zapdos usage change? The answer is that it will obviously increase. Thus, Shockproof, while inferior overall to Unaware, is still an ability that will help our pokemon "decentralize" the metagame. |
|
|
|
|
#46 | |||
|
CAP 8 Playtesting Expert
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 669
It's a showdown.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 542
|
time mage, let me see if i get this right:you don't like shockproof because its too mindgame-y for you? seriously, we are doing competitive gaming, since when have the use of mindgames been a bad idea? tyroboah? chainchomp? physical pyroak? heatproof zong? its already been around for a while. confusing your opponent is never a bad thing.
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,311
Bland Juicer
|
I'd be okay with no-guard, but I went with NO SECONDARY ABILITY
__________________
And I was gone.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|