|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#51 |
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 6,605
|
Regice was never OU in D/P, so I believe you're considering older generations, so... There's Tauros. His fall from grace was even worse, because he was kind of a "god" in RBY.
|
|
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,591
^ brought to you by Cartoons!
|
Thanks sir X-Act. I find it pretty funny that one time Pinsir was banned from UU, and now it can't even make the list lol. NU list is surprisingly filled with pretty decent pokemon, I could imagine it getting sliced in half (rarely used??)
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,905
Irvine, CA
|
NU looks like it might be shaping up to be a lot like old UU, minus the "circle jerk of stall," (hard to do that without Froslass, Clefable, and Steelix) as it's been so eloquently put.
__________________
Black/White Friend Code: 1721 2578 4968 My Pokemon | Free Pokemon | YouTube | Wonder Cards (now with Movie Celebis for Platinum and HG/SS!) |
|
|
|
|
#54 | |
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 858
|
Quote:
Hmm...there's a lot of really high attack scores running around NU, now that I think about it. Intimidaters would be welcome. Tangrowth and Leafeon have great defense scores and Ground resists, so I can see them being popular tanks. |
|
|
|
|
|
#55 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,132
|
Quote:
Old UU was different from New UU is how you should look at it. It's a completely different metagame so I'm curious why you're comparing banlists - depending on the Pokemon and Players available, you'll end up with different ideas of what is broken. To say the old UU was "screwed up" because the banlist and the metagame was completely different from new UU... I'll let you figure that one out yourself since hopefully you're capable of doing so. |
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 100
|
|
|
|
|
|
#57 | |
|
GO JETS GO
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,090
CanaJew
|
Quote:
He was trying to say that commonly used Pokemon in "new" UU, such as Clefable, Steelix and mostly Froslass were in old UU, and there were none of these "BL" Pokemon to balance out the tier, which was true, and many of those Pokemon (mainly Froslass, imo), made the tier a little "messed up". And that isnt too far from the truth, imo.
__________________
f u, v |
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 917
In the Hypothalamus
|
To me it seems this new UU consist of all the old BL Poke'mon plus some of the commonly used old UU Poke'mon.
And NU is the old UU list plus Medicham and a few other wtf Poke'mon. NU seems most promising. Yanmega in UU doesn't really affect me personally because I don't think its going to really affect that metagame too much. But those are my thoughts.
__________________
swoosh! |
|
|
|
|
#59 | |
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 294
Dollar, Scotland
|
I am surprised to see Wallrein in NU. i am assuming it just had really bad usage figuires, but I think my fellow OU players and I can attest to the fact that one false move against a hail team with Stallrein in can just be GG. It;s also hard to prevent Wallrein setting up with something like Salamence's Draco Meteor, so I don't know how NU teams will manage. Maybe I'll watch a few battles and get some tips on how to beat this potent stalling threat.
I hope Yanmega moving to UU will lessen it;s use in OU even more, I think once it sets up it's hatefully powerful even in OU. I will be interested to see how UU reacts to Yanmega, I hope it won't overcentralize (sp?) Quote:
__________________
Gen IV OU CRE Record : 1630 (12th) Gen V OU CRE Record : 1231 (144th) Terrakion is quite a good pocket monster. Nothing is ever as good or bad as it seems. |
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,091
|
Don't forget that Abomasnow has been moved to Limbo.
__________________
<dogfish44> I got a suprise KFC ^.^ <Glacier> kinky fat chick? |
|
|
|
|
#61 | ||
|
Don't cry, little one
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,452
Italy
|
Quote:
Hope this was clearer, and forgive us if that offended the feelings of someone, in a way or the another Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#62 | |
|
******************
![]()
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 953
|
Quote:
The reason for these Pokemon's usage in nUU didn't have anything to do with their high performance in UU, or nothing to do with their overall performance in general. They all just found specific niches the in new tier; Steelix could counter Raikou while also other Physical hard hitters, Froslass' performance was enhanced with Abomasnow, etc. In 'old UU' these specifics were inexistent and therefore, so was their high usage in comparison to the the more powerful BL Pokemon. ie; the old UU being "screwed up" had nothing to do with the Pokemon in it, but rather, the Pokemon not. |
|
|
|
|
|
#63 | |
|
Hmmm... A name for the plan...
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,938
Sea Forest
|
Quote:
And no, it's not just a matter of "difference." Pokes that were banned from UU based totally on theorymon (entei, ramparados, pinser, etc.) have now been proven to be less useful competitively than pokes that were allowed in the tier (froslass, rotom, steelix, clefable, etc.). That to me, is quite a distinct indicator that our methods for creating the old UU were ineffectual, and created a rather warped tier. And you could see it in play near the end-- practically every team was looking to set up SR + Spikes + Toxic Spikes + Status 3-4 of the enemy pokes + rapid spin + block with 2 different ghosts (yeah, froslass and rotom were gods). I am exhagerating a bit, but I think it's fair to say that the benefit from actually attacking was so low (the offensive pokes so weak) that there was little point in actually attacking (unless you were absol, in which case nothing could stop you after platinum, but you were still gonna die in 1-2 turns and you were kinda a one man show). I'm not saying the people who made Old UU were stupid (contrary, they were quite intelligent overall, and some I'd say very much so), but that doesn't change the fact that all the theorymonning created a tier that, looking at the usage stats we have now, does not make sense. Yes, in a way you can say "it's just because the tiers were different," because pokemon usage is affected by what's available. IE Eruption Entei might have ripped through old UU (though I doubt it), but can't do so through new UU because of Chansey. That example was totally imagined up there, but the point is yeah-- pokemon usefulness also depends on what's around them so in a way "you can't compare the tiers because they're fundamentally different." But it's not completely about environment. There's also the individual abilities of each pokemon. Scizor is the king of OU and that's every bit as much because its offensive abilities are really impressive, as it is about the fact it can 1hko A, B and C under conditions D. I think a couple of pokes to demonstrate this point really well recently are Lucario and Wobbuffet. Environmentally speaking, everyone up until this point thought of them as really unimpressive in Ubers, but the abilities that they actually have was shown to be really powerful in practice. Inversely, it's been a historical idea that Pinser never got any use in OU just because it was outclassed so badly by Heracross. In practice though, even without heracross around Pinser still isn't UU-- which indicates something about Pinser itself (lol, SR weak!). In the same way, the fact that Clefable was a top UU before, and still is a top UU now while pokes who were banned are falling to NU, I think that speaks a lot for Clefable. Last edited by Chou Toshio; Apr 6th, 2009 at 4:03:06 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
wubwubwub
![]() ![]() ![]()
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,118
wubwubwub
|
Guys keep in mind that this is only the first tier list for UU....we haven't really gotten a chance to completely explore the metagame. I know that I've only used like 20 pokemon tops on the UU ladder so far, so I know I haven't discovered everything. The tier list is probably going to grow a lot next time.
Also, Yanmega just seems insane. I don't think it will last in UU for very long.
__________________
NIGMAN: JRRRR IS A SHIT NIGMAN: HO ESLE THINK IT?? |
|
|
|
|
#65 | |
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 869
|
Quote:
Plus, how can they possibly be putting things like Rampardos, Slaking, Tauros, Tangrowth, and Lickilicky in the tier as Ledian, Ariados, Wormadam, Luvdisc and Pachirisu?
__________________
Liu Yi Fei = Hot |
|
|
|
|
|
#66 | |
|
indulges in unsavory behavior
![]() ![]() ![]()
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,744
|
Quote:
I was in the process of typing up the same exact thing before I read your reply. Yanmeega in UU, and Medicham, Tauros, Mawrowak, Venomoth and Pinsir in NU makes no sense at all.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,091
|
It makes perfect sense. People weren't using them because they didn't see how they could be more useful to them than the other possible options, so they dropped from the higher usage tiers to the lower usage tiers.
__________________
<dogfish44> I got a suprise KFC ^.^ <Glacier> kinky fat chick? |
|
|
|
|
#68 | |
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 858
|
Quote:
Besides, nothing says NU has to be the last tier. We can make another balanced tier with the current NUs, call it Rarely Used or something, and leave the rest for NU. At that point, you should be pretty much down to your worthless pokemon and NFEs. |
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 6
Alaska
|
Smeargle fanboys will be happy with this ._.
One in and one out, i was expecting a new revamp of the entire OU tier. |
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Spammer
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,781
|
Finally the new tiers.
Two questions: What do you mean with Rotom-A? and, is there going to be a BL Tier again?
__________________
Battle FC: 2192 8744 5970 / Trade FC: 4168 5630 8453
Holy cake! I have 389 Pokémon in my thread and still counting!! Rules for battle me!! |
|
|
|
|
#71 | |
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,269
|
Quote:
afaik, there wont be such a thing as BL tier again, BL will ( I think ? ) just contain the Pkm that are said to be too strong for UU. |
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 669
San Francisco
|
Fanboy! Fanboy here! After reading this whole thread, I like the notion people mentioning it. It makes me jump ^_^. The only bad thing is I can't use it in UU anymore x.x
__________________
I'm here to play the hand that I'm dealt I suggest you do the same these words are heartfelt |
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
np: Biffy Clyro - Shock Shock
![]() ![]()
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,679
Malta
|
Rotom-A means Rotom-Appliance, which is one of Rotom-C, Rotom-F, Rotom-H, Rotom-S or Rotom-W.
And yes, there will be a BL list. However, I have little to do with it, just as I have little to do with the Uber list - the voters will shape up those two tiers.
__________________
http://users.smogon.com/X-Act For all your Pokemon needs (and more!) including: the Defensive EVs applet, the Probabilities of Breeding IVs in Pokemon applet, and the Ratings of Pokemon Base Stats applet (now Version 2.0!). And also the IV to PID applet! |
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,091
|
I actually prefer it when pokemon I like to use in battle that actually work remain in UU. That way, I can use them in OU play and surprise my opponents, who are often unable to deal with such threats as Curse Umbreon, bulky Moltres and Sub Punch Hariyama.
__________________
<dogfish44> I got a suprise KFC ^.^ <Glacier> kinky fat chick? |
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,357
Le Petit Prince
|
Wait, Slowbro made UU and Slowking didn't? What the hell? Is 80 Def that bad?
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|