Smogon Community Preventing Speed Creep
 Register FAQ Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 Jul 21st, 2010, 12:46:07 AM #26 FlareBlitz This was never a story that would have a happy ending.     Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 2,041 Somewhere on the edge of the bell curve Well, that's kinda what I meant. Like if you want Machamp to outrun Skarm you give it enough speed in the analysis to outrun 4 SPE skarm and then say "skarm frequently runs more speed, if you want to try and outrun faster variants take some points out of ATK because the HP EVs are necessary to avoid a KO from starmie". __________________ Everything was beautiful. Nothing hurt. I'm back, baby. Look for me in 5th gen UU!
 Jul 21st, 2010, 8:39:44 AM #27 Great Sage**   Administrator Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 5,872 Boston, MA Mentor I didn't misunderstand. I was trying to say "why are you setting 4 Speed as the standard", when setting 0 Speed as the standard accomplishes the same thing and is significantly less arbitrary.
 Jul 21st, 2010, 5:48:54 PM #28 FlareBlitz This was never a story that would have a happy ending.     Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 2,041 Somewhere on the edge of the bell curve Oh, I see. Let me explain. Our analysis for Pokemon A has 252 HP/252 DEF/4 SPE. This is based on Guideline 2 in my post, which states that the best place to put an extra point is SPE. We're trying to make Pokemon B outrun Pokemon A. Suppose this Pokemon needs 140 EVs to outrun 0 SPE Pokemon A, and 144 to outrun the 4 SPE one. In this case, we should use 144 SPE because otherwise Pokemon B would not outrun the Pokemon A set in our analysis! Basically, I'm saying that we should maintain consistency. If we say "140 EVs outruns this pokemon" and someone goes to that Pokemon's analysis and finds out it doesn't....yeah. But at the same time, this prevents speed creep because putting 148 SPE is unnecessary when we note that "hey pokemon A often runs more speed than this, take some EVs out of attack if you want". I hope that makes sense. __________________ Everything was beautiful. Nothing hurt. I'm back, baby. Look for me in 5th gen UU!
 Aug 9th, 2010, 12:01:45 AM #29 whistle     Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 1,604 Location: Chicago bumping this. my thoughts on the 4/0 speed debate are that if we make 0 speed the standard, in order not to deceive readers intentionally we'll have to add "but x pokemon may commonly use 4 speed or more" to everything. i feel like the 4 extra evs are dumped in speed more often than not, which makes it more practical for us to use that as the baseline (this also is a reason why it's not just an arbitrary number to pick; 252/252/4 is a "standard" spread while 252/248/8 is not). opinions from different people, especially ones who battle competitively on a high level, will help here. (c&c people, link those people here). for those people who don't want to read 10 pages of nerds arguing about shit, here's the problem. it's kind of stupid to have analyses add 4/8/12 evs to speed of low speed to beat similar low speed pokemon (metagross/empoleon/magnezone/skarmory/tyranitar, kind of) since that will never end. it makes more sense to limit these pokemon to beating minimum eved variants of the others, but we can't figure out whether "minimum" should be defined as 0 evs (since that is the literal minimum) or 4 evs (since that is oftentimes the practical minimum). anyways, regardless of how we resolve that issue, we have to figure out what to do with the "no speed creep" rule. obviously we should discourage speed creep whenever we see it in analyses. but i think we should also do something like what QC did to current on-site analyses, and eliminate speed creep from those as well. here is a non conclusive list of sets i believe are inflicted by speed creep (i didn't spend much time doing this so i am definitely missing a lot). lead metagross + lead empoleon + spiker skarmory + cb tyranitar many of azumarill's sets wish cm jirachi maybe after we generate a moderately sized list (which would still be incomplete) we can get some people to go through these and start fixing. i would be willing to be on such a team, obviously. __________________ <&Gouki> whistles sig is the best thing on smogon (slightly updated 3/13/13)
 Aug 9th, 2010, 10:57:28 AM #30 eric the espeon maybe I just misunderstood   Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 3,695 It'd be easy for a group of 3-4 people to go through all the analyses fix all the on site "speed creep" sets in a few days once we decide the only real remaining issue (4 speed or 0 speed standard). We've done larger sweeps before, and this should not be a particularly hard one. @Phantom_IV: Sorry, I assumed that "None" meant None, not few. __________________ For people who like storing things: The Box Reading and LC? LCF, LC Guide, LC Analyses Good channels: #littlecup, #C&C, #1v1, others And for SCMS editors: SCMS group ete on IRC. Goodbye Smogon. Good luck, was fun while it lasted.
 Aug 9th, 2010, 3:52:34 PM #31 firecape This is the end...     Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 1,048 This storys old, but it goes on and on until we disappear Well, Ubers in particular suffers from pretty bad Speed creep due to the large amount of Pokemon with the same base Speed. For instance, some Kyogre sets run enough to outpace Tyranitar, but then some Ho-Oh sets run enough to outspeed that. All of these analysis have it in some form or another: Giratina-O Groudon Ho-Oh Dialga Kyogre (this ones wierd, some have 4 HP, some have 4 Spe) __________________ I DONT DESERVE YOU
 Aug 12th, 2010, 3:36:04 PM #32 Morm Banned deucer.   Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 4,253 not here, thank god This is a pretty good example of what the metagame for pokemon has become. With shoddy and the stats it provides, along with the sheer number of users and matches per month, this game changes FAST. Meanwhile, you have smogon effectively putting pins in all the sets that work which is a rather static condition, as the EV situation points out. There's no real way to mitigate this through a series of articles except for a discussion about that as proposed in the OP rather than giving out discrete numbers (which would mean constant editting of the articles). I like this idea, to say it in a short way.
 Aug 14th, 2010, 4:26:17 AM #33 FlareBlitz This was never a story that would have a happy ending.     Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 2,041 Somewhere on the edge of the bell curve A lot of the semi-old UU analyses have speed creep, including things like 16 Spe for Azumarill and 28 Spe for Tangrowth. I don't envy whoever volunteers to go through and fix all that. The most important thing we can do though is prevent new instances of speed creep. This is actually proving really difficult, for me at least, since I kind of skip over 16 Spe as the same as 4 Spe (due to the way I build teams). I think a fool-proof, if somewhat intensive, way to address this problem is to have all contributors explain the purpose of Spe EVs if they're running any amount besides 0, 4, or 252. That way if a contributor sees something like "running 12 EVs to outrun pokemon who are trying to outrun 4 Spe variants" they can immediately crack down on it. __________________ Everything was beautiful. Nothing hurt. I'm back, baby. Look for me in 5th gen UU!
Sep 11th, 2010, 6:30:31 PM   #36
supermarth64
I see sparks fly whenever you smile

Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,314
Illinois

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Fat eric the espeon Outrunning a min speed Pokemon is not considered Speed Creep. 84 Evs would be acceptable, and is already used for the OU CB set.
Didn't want to bring it up in that thread (here: http://www.smogon.com/forums/showthread.php?t=78668), so I brought it here.

Anyway, why wouldn't it be considered Speed creep? The defensive Pokemon that runs 0 Spe can just run 8 Spe and lose a very little amount of defensive capability in order to outspeed that Pokemon that tries to outspeed the defensive Pokemon in the first place, which is Speed creep as I see it.
__________________
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Fat LonelyNess Hey guys let's stop whining about hax, we play Pokemon.

 Sep 11th, 2010, 6:38:30 PM #37 mtr     Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 1,754 In Ubers, speed creep has gone too far. Jibaku has been known to run 112 Speed Groudons, and when I run 36 Speed Groudon to beat Ho-oh I get informed that "invest more speed, you lose to 40 Speed Ho-oh". The same logic can be applied to anything. Regarding the analyses, what I suggest is radical, but I feel it is necessary: remove all speed from the basic EVs and allocate them to the defenses of choice. Then write a note in the analysis giving specific defensive targets for the Pokemon to hit, and leaving it up to the reader to decide how much speed he wants to invest. __________________ Huehuehue
Sep 11th, 2010, 9:37:13 PM   #38
eric the espeon
maybe I just misunderstood

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,695

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Fat supermarth64 Didn't want to bring it up in that thread (here: http://www.smogon.com/forums/showthread.php?t=78668), so I brought it here. Anyway, why wouldn't it be considered Speed creep? The defensive Pokemon that runs 0 Spe can just run 8 Spe and lose a very little amount of defensive capability in order to outspeed that Pokemon that tries to outspeed the defensive Pokemon in the first place, which is Speed creep as I see it.
The creep is the steady increase of speed, the competition in which both analyses can and will gradually raise their speed to try and beat the other. So long as we select a place to stop the creep (in this case, outspeeding 0 Spe spreads) it does not become a problem for the analyses. There is some degree of arbitrariness in deciding to cut it off at beating 0 speed spreads, however it seems by far the best place to stop since it is the lowest speed that lets you beat "some" of the set you are trying to beat. Extra investment beyond that required to beat 0 speed foes is "optional". It is up to the individual player to decide how large a drop in other stats is tolerable in order to outspeed more foes. The metagame will always have speed wars in which players invest a variable number of EVs in speed to beat sets aiming for a similar Speed. This is impossible to avoid and not harmful in any way. What this thread addresses is how the analyses should deal with it, since they cannot follow the day by day change in how many Pokemon run 8 or 16 EVs (especially without super specific stats, other than on PO I guess).

An added advantage to using "you may outspeed 0 speed spreads" and "you may run 4 Speed Evs" as guidelines together is that it puts the slow Pokemon running some speed to beat 0 Speed sets of other Pokemon on an even footing with those Pokemon who don't want to invest more than 4 Speed Evs. It means that, from an analysis perspective, they have the same Speed. In the metagame both will end up investing a little more than the analysis suggests a vast majority of the time when used by competent players, but as previously stated the analyses cannot follow this in any consistent, accurate, and useful way. Giving users the bare minimum investment and letting them make their own decision on how much extra to invest more useful.
__________________
For people who like storing things: The Box
Reading and LC? LCF, LC Guide, LC Analyses
Good channels: #littlecup, #C&C, #1v1, others
And for SCMS editors: SCMS group
ete on IRC. Goodbye Smogon. Good luck, was fun while it lasted.

 Sep 12th, 2010, 3:23:38 PM #39 umbarsc   Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 1,992 minnesooooota If we're going to have speed creep rules, we should define the different "types" of Pokemon and what speed they're ideally going to run. Disclaimer: Yes, not all Pokemon will fit some role exactly, this is just in general. Frail Sweeper: 252 Spe / 252 Atk They aren't supposed to take hits, so they always run max Spe. EX: Gengar, Jolteon Balanced: Atk benchmark / Spe benchmark / rest HP/Def This one's a little trickier, but this is one where Speed, offense and bulk are all utilized. EX: BulkyGyara, Rotom-A, ChestoRest Kingdra Bulky Offense: 252 Atk / minimal Spe / rest in HP "Tanks", Pokemon that are supposed to take hits and hit hard back. Basically runs max Atk, hits a speed benchmark with like 20-80 EVs invested (or otherwise 0 Spe), and the rest dumped in HP. EX: Rhyperior, Azumarill, Donphan (thinking UU here) Walls: 252 HP / 252 Def Pure defensive Pokemon. Doesn't run any speed unless it's fast enough to outrun a specific slower tier (8 Spe Milotic for example) EX: Skarmory, Blissey, Weezing With offensive Pokemon there isn't any problem, since they're all running max Spe or just enough to outrun other max Spe Pokemon. The problem basically comes up with the last two types, where everyone is running the bare minimum Speed. Basically, the rules as I see them are below: 1. Walls are required to run minimum speed, unless they have high enough base Spe to beat max Spe slower Pokemon. Any wall with less than something like 70 Base Spe should always be running minimum Speed. The exceptions are with things like Milotic and Uxie, who are naturally fast and only need minimal investment for things like Max Spe Adamant Aggron. 2. Bulky offense Pokemon are allowed to run enough to outrun minimum Speed walls. Best example of this is with Donphan running 84 Spe for minimum speed Clefable and Weezing. Since the Pokemon is offensive in nature, a few Speed EVs are more beneficial to it than to walls. 3. Pokemon can only run 1 point above a speed tier, not 2. This means that we can't play the game of "Lanturn can run x EVs to outspeed Milotic by 1 that outspeeds Torterra by 1." Drop Lanturn's Speed down to Torterra +1, then say something like "The EVs outspeed Adamant Torterra, but many Milotic also hit that same speed stat... hint hint..." __________________ Aldaron: what umbarsc you are not allowed to be scandinavian Aldaron: i love scandinavians Aldaron: you can be Mexican