|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#26 |
|
bringer of torture
![]() ![]()
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,232
Prague
|
Can't wait to play this. Losing to the RNG, not the opponent is really stupid imo (+2 Kingdra getting frozen by Suicune's Ice Beam oh yes).
I'd say freezes and crits should be removed altogether, and the full paralysis bs should be as well.
__________________
RYM |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 623
|
I think all chances of 10% or lower need to be removed (not counting secondary effects from elemental fangs or Tri Attack). Rock Slide always hits (there is no other 100% accurate physical rock move besides 50 BP Knock Down, unfortunately).
Also, if Blizzard/Thunder/Focus Blast/etc. is made 100% accurate, I think the secondary effect chance needs to be the original secondary effect chance*the original accuracy of the move. For example, Zap Cannon may be 100% accurate, but only have a 50% chance to paralyze, not making it completely broken (70BP 100% chance to paralyze!?). All moves, items and abilities that only introduce hax should be banned, obviously. (Brightpowder, Double Team, Minimize, Inconsistent, Acupressure, King's Rock, Razor Claw, Scope Lens, Lax Incense, Razor Fang, Sand Veil, Snow Cloak, Focus Band, etc. if there is anything else) However, we may need to work around some abilities, like Sand Veil/Snow cloak lowers HP dealt by 20% in Sand/Hail, respectively. Speed ties should be like in Aldaron's thread (both pokemon move simultaneously, not being affected by the opponent's move until both are executed, assuming equal priority). Also, we need to get rid of regular shinies. The chance of getting one is so small. :P |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 12
|
sorry if this is a troll but
let's get this straight cat, you don't have a fair grasp of programming high school didn't do shit for you edit: by the way, i'm not 100% certain, but assuming you're planning on using PO scripts i don't think most of what you're looking to do is possible at the moment another edit: the reason why is that PO doesn't really allow for in-battle scripting; you can't even do basic stuff like chat formatting (think commands like !join or !rank) with battles, at least with the code they have documented on the main site Last edited by fugibo; Jan 23rd, 2011 at 3:16:35 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 157
|
A lot of this stuff is doable by editing the server move files (changing accuracy / secondary effects / flinch / power / etc) and minor edits in the source (one line to remove CHs, one line to remove full paralysis). This has nothing to do with the client though, there's really nothing to change client side.
Let's see where you take us ^^ |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 12
|
woah you can actually view the source
man it would've been awesome for that to be mentioned, like, anywhere now i can actually do stuff |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 | |
|
maybe I just misunderstood
![]() ![]() ![]()
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,695
|
Quote:
__________________
For people who like storing things: The Box Reading and LC? LCF, LC Guide, LC Analyses Good channels: #littlecup, #C&C, #1v1, others And for SCMS editors: SCMS group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 157
|
Great idea, and you should call that server Pokémon Chess too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 76
Minnesota
|
Just posting to give my opinion on Serene Grace. I think it would make a lot of sense to change it to making the secondary effect ALWAYS happen on turn one, such as Iron Head always flinching first turn, then from there have the probabilities calculated as a non-serene grace pokemon would.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 977
Dirtiest player on smogon
|
Quote:
__________________
Curtains Youtube Channel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 37
|
You sir, just took the hard work of making an entire simulator without hax (and other stuff :P) off my back. Any help you need, PM.
__________________
99% of players whine about bad luck like prepubescent school girls. If you're one of those 99%, who just love to bitch, put this in your signature. |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,060
Up North, UK
|
Personally not too fussed about the idea, it's cool and all but just not my thing.
I do however have a suggestion for crits. Instead of removing the crit function altogether, you could simply lower the chance of all crits happening by the default crit rate. Crits would normally be impossible, pokemon holding scope lens or with a crit boosting ability would have the normal 6.25% chance of critting, as a fairly unique benefit in the otherwise critless meta. Implementing crit damage idk about, but this is a possibility for the chance side of things. |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 552
|
What will Focus Energy do?
Just a thought: Perhaps make Focus Energy make the next damage-dealing move used crit. |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Fast-moving, smart, sexy and alarming.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,152
|
It seems like if you are going to do this, you should do it all the way, not "Eliminate all luck, except for in a couple of cases". You're already going extreme, so you should stick to that goal and not randomly compromise (and definitely not randomly add in elements of luck in some places, like making moves with secondary effects lose accuracy).
__________________
Previously obi. Technical Machine, a Pokemon AI. "Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat." - Sun Tzu |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|