Rearrange Past Generations C&C subforums

bugmaniacbob · Feb 18th, 2012, 11:06:55 AM

^what the title says

Essentially we seem to be wasting a lot of space with four separate DPP subforums, which collectively contain 1 analysis, which is fewer than both ADV and RBY at present. Not entirely certain why DPP is getting preferential treatment regardless since it's almost as dead, but it's probably because nobody has so much as looked at the forum for a while

I'd prefer to see an arrangement along the lines of:

RBY/GSC/ADV --- DPP --- VGC 2011 --- Articles

We could also use prefixes to denote tier in the case of DPP, should it be confusing otherwise (doubtful, but whatever's easiest I guess).

Not a lot else to explain so I'll leave it there.

Great Sage · Feb 18th, 2012, 2:27:04 PM

OK.

Feb 18th, 2012, 11:06:55 AM	#1
bugmaniacbob Fare thee well. Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 2,038 Floccinaucinihilipilification	Rearrange Past Generations C&C subforums ^what the title says Essentially we seem to be wasting a lot of space with four separate DPP subforums, which collectively contain 1 analysis, which is fewer than both ADV and RBY at present. Not entirely certain why DPP is getting preferential treatment regardless since it's almost as dead, but it's probably because nobody has so much as looked at the forum for a while I'd prefer to see an arrangement along the lines of: RBY/GSC/ADV --- DPP --- VGC 2011 --- Articles We could also use prefixes to denote tier in the case of DPP, should it be confusing otherwise (doubtful, but whatever's easiest I guess). Not a lot else to explain so I'll leave it there.

Feb 18th, 2012, 2:27:04 PM	#2
Great Sage Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 5,875 Boston, MA	OK.