ASB Feedback & Game Issues Thread (New Proposal Handling System in OP) - Page 2

C$FP · Mar 19th, 2012, 12:52:46 PM

This post. I fully support this, and some other people seemed to as well. Oh hey, look at that, here it is again! Quite frankly, I think it's ridiculous that this:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fat Its_A_Random

IF Paralysed is not a legal Substitution, as it is not based off the success or failure of a specific move.

is true. "IF fully paralyzed" is perfectly reasonable, and I simply don't see why it's illegal. I would also like to point out that I am totally against the combination of not reffing illegal actions and ignoring illegal substitutions while reffing; I think it's a ludicrous inconsistency. When I'm reffing or ordering second in a battle, I just tell people when their substitutions are illegal and have them change the sub, but I think everyone should, on the same principals for making people fix illegal actions (whatever those are; I would be fine with getting rid of the rule that forces refs to not ref illegal actions, one or the other imo).

EDIT: words of wisdom:
14:37 dogfish44 Chance subs should cover things that occur by... chance!

Also, when you look at this thing, I must say that the current sub rules are just not very good. I do, however, like the somewhat recent revamp to attack subs.

Leethoof · Mar 27th, 2012, 11:51:36 AM

Hi. This was brought up in the SOTG, but then SOTG died before people looked at it, I think. I truly believe an ASB dex / ASB mon analyses is a beneficial thing, as it can help both new users and veterans pick out additions to their teams, expand ~~hipsterism~~ diversity in ASB, etc.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fat Leethoof

I'd like to bring up this idea I had, and it doesn't really fit in the RP thread, so I'll post it here.

The Pokemon Review Center

In this thread, users can submit reviews of their favorite pokemon, to help both newbies and veterans shopping around for new additions to their team. The review will be consisted of two parts: a "quick-look" and the in-depth explanation. The quick-look will have specific ratings on three important parts of an ASB mon: Offense, Defense, and Support, rated from a range of horrible, poor, average, good, great. The in-depth explanation would be where the author can explain the ins and outs of using the mon, its strengths and weaknesses, pointing out notable moves, etc.

Perhaps a commitee or some kind of QC/GP team for ASB could be established to ensure the quality of these reviews.

Example

Take a guess

Edit: Lou also thinks 'mon of the week' is a good idea, so we'd probably have to decide as a community which we'd rather have.

And there was also Lou's idea:

Lou

I'll propose what I thought Leethoof was originally talking about. Imagine, if you will, the following thread:

Thread: (Data) Mon of the Week - Volcarona

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fat Douche

Mon of the Week

Review the following mon:

Volcarona
100/2/3/5/4/100

Flame Body | Swarm (DW)

Guiding Questions

What roles does this mon fill? Offensive, supportive, or a blend? How diverse is this mon in its playstyle?
What are this mon's selling points? What makes it preferable when compared to competition for the same role?
What are some of this mon's "must-have" moves? Which moves open up new avenues or playstyles when purchased?
What are some of this mon's failings? What holds it back, or makes it unsuitable for use in certain situations?
What counters this mon? What can this mon do to fight back against its counters?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fat Other Douche

I've found Volcarona to be a deceptively diverse mon. Her stats and Generation V status suggest a vanilla beatdown attacker, but a couple of key moves let her perform as a bulky tank, rain attacker, doubles or triples support, or some other more niche roles. She's certainly capable of surprising unwary foes.
The first things that stand out are Volcarona's stats—blistering Special Attack, above-average defenses, and comparitively high speed. Fire typing gives her powerful STABs to abuse, and access to instant recovery, possible 100/4/4 bulk, and the constant threat of burn make her a convincing defensive piece, on top of her powerful offensive presence.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fat Less Verbose Douche

She can attack while tanking, and can function in Sun or Rain well.
High SpA, powerful STABs, great bulk and speed, unique typing and helpful abilities.
Fire STABs, Morning Sun, Light Screen, SolarBeam, and Endure.
The Rock weakness is killer, stopping things from walling stuff she'd otherwise be a complete stop to.
Regirock is the closest thing to a guaranteed stop; high special defense and Rock STAB help bring her down, but burn is unpleasant.

I'd finish this, but you get the idea already.

Either way, one of these should defenitely become a part of ASB.

Yarnus of Bethany · Mar 27th, 2012, 12:35:31 PM

I like both these ideas, and would like to suggest combining them. There could be a thread where people post their articles, and then a review panel could choose one each week to sticky and to allow comments on. That would allow the articles to be both accessible and user controlled, gaining the pros of both suggestions.

Yarnus of Bethany · Mar 30th, 2012, 4:39:06 PM

No feedback on any of these three ideas?

Yarnus of Bethany · Apr 5th, 2012, 4:42:38 PM

If nobody forbids, I think I will post a new discussion thread on this topic. Is that all right?

Alchemator · Apr 5th, 2012, 4:53:34 PM

No?

Traditionally RP development takes place in social groups anyway, especially for something like that. Discuss it here or in a group, and once you've done some work to show how it'll be set out and such we can consider approving it.

Personally I don't see the idea of a 'mon of the week' and such working: ASB isn't detailed enough to have huge discussions (What do you do against Metagross? Oh I Fiery Dance...) A database of mon reviews could be promising though.

**Deck Knight** · Apr 5th, 2012, 4:57:33 PM

I was actually planning to start up a Pokemon of the Week after reading the census and choosing a fairly cool middling mon. Then I had a lot of CAP Proper drama to resolve so it kind of got shunted to the side.

In any case, "If Fully Paralyzed aX, use Y aX+1" is perfectly reasonable as a chance sub.

smashlloyd20 · Apr 6th, 2012, 3:25:50 PM

Okay, so I think it's becoming kind of clear that at the moment, even with the fixed arenas, gyms are kinda sorta very broken. Not a single leader has lost a match yet (or will lose any of their upcoming matches). Quoting Korski's post in the main gyms thread; "50% should be a goal, not a minimum." The gym system SHOULD be designed to give the challenger and the GL both a good chance of winning. The way it's set up now is basically to give as many advantages to the GL as possible. Ignoring the arenas, I think a big point here is the B8P3 advantage the GLs get. It's sound logic for normal Pokemon, but in ASB the massive variety of moves and Abilities available to each Pokemon just makes this system overkill. With 8 Pokemon that share one (possibly secondary) typing, it's easy for the GL to counterteam the challenger, not the other way around. Perhaps changing this to B6P3 or so would help alleviate challengers getting counterteamed by GLs.

Alchemator · Apr 7th, 2012, 12:00:58 PM

I'd agree that gyms are somewhat broken at the moment, but I'd put that more down to the arenas than the choice of Pokémon.

Plus, the pool of battles hasn't been great so far: they've all been against strong types with strong gym leaders. Many have challenged without due preparations, and those that had prepared have either been unlucky or played badly (e.g. Kaxtar, sorry man!).

I'd hold out for a while yet before passing definite judgement, but I'm pretty sure the problem lies in the arenas.

smashlloyd20 · Apr 8th, 2012, 6:35:28 PM

Okay, so with the advent of Atheno's new gym I have a bit more to say on the topic of gym brokenness. Basically, both sides are B8P3, the arena has some (but not overpowering) Water advantages, and the opponent's team must share one common type. While I don't exactly agree with the one common type thing (perhaps B5P3 with two shared types allowed?), this is a step in the right direction.

I think the base disagreement here is how hard, exactly, we want gyms to be. Do we want any very good player with a strong, built-up team with a few mons effective against the gym type to be able to beat that gym? Or do we basically want only gym leaders super-effective against the gym's type, playing at the top of their game, to be able to win? Right now, the gym system is strongly tending towards the second option. Basically, the challenger has no advantages short of being able to bring whatever three Pokemon they want. But I'd argue that this may hardly matter anyway, as with the ridiculous assortment of secondary types and Abilities available to the majority of types in Pokemon, quite often the CHALLENGER can get counterteamed...not the other way around. Then there's the whole issue of the arenas, which just further the issue.

tl;dr: How hard do we want the gyms to be?

typon77 · Apr 8th, 2012, 10:35:59 PM

I could not agree with smash more. Most gym arena's themselves would be fine considering the leaders HAVE to use a monotype team, and without some boosts they would get screwed. However, B8P3 lets them respond to such a huge variety of threats that the challenger can bring. Since most Gym's do a coin toss for who sends out first, if the challenger has to send out first, the leader almost always has a good counter to that mon, and can respond quickly and gain an early advantage. This isnt saying its easy for the challenger if they order second, as they can easily judge which Pokemon of their 8 is best to take on any of a set of 3. Lowering the amount of pokemon the Gym Leaders could bring could help, but I think that letting the challengers bring more than 3 pokemon could have an even greater impact. This would prevent the challenger from getting counterteamed, as smash said, as they would have more options to respond to the variety that each leader has.

Gerard · Apr 13th, 2012, 4:44:36 PM

Since pokes can get tutor moves from old releases, why not let them get moves that they can use in the anime but can't learn in-game

The moves are just a few adds to a cuple of pokemon (if you saw the list you probably noticed how must stuff is useless), but it gives a couple of mons a few new tricks or coverage:

FE list

Using this as anime precedence it's easy to see how this pokes would be able to learn this moves

EndQuote · Apr 23rd, 2012, 3:54:25 AM

Because of this battle, I have a suggestion.
In a Doubles battle, when Protect is shifted to an ally, it should count as a protective move used by that ally. (Meaning the ally should not be able to immediately Protect/Detect/Evasive Agility/Evasive Teleport/Dodge the action afterward)
Otherwise, you get ridiculous Perish Song run-out-the-clock battles, like the aforementioned one.
When one player hasn't got a prayer of winning, no matter what they do, something is seriously wrong.

EDIT: @Lou, Fang does know Roar. He's also Taunted. Not too much help, that.
So, as it turns out, Volt Switch and U-Turn remove enemy-inflicted Perish Song, which is a perfectly logical way to solve the aforementioned problem.
So ignore this post...

LouisCyphre · Apr 23rd, 2012, 6:00:31 AM

Buy Roar for Feraligatr. You can Roar your ally to get rid of their foe-inflicted Perish Count.

Hope that helps.

Athenodoros · Apr 24th, 2012, 9:30:05 AM

As far as I can tell SDS's sub revamp is not in any of the main data threads. It should be.

EDIT: Didn't see that. Although it is a weird place for it, given the players need it just as much as refs. Seems like a DAT thing to me.

Objection · Apr 24th, 2012, 11:30:48 AM

It's in the referee resource thread under the hide tag labelled "Substitution rules"

EDIT: The DAT makes several references to two-hit and multi-hit moves with regards to things like critical hits and Technician. The way it does this suggests that two-hit and multi-hit are entirely separate classes of move, so moves like Bonemerang, Double Hit and Double Kick are not multi-hit moves. The question is, what kind of move is Triple Kick? It's a three-hit move, but there is no mention anywhere of three-hit moves, which suggests that Triple Kick is either lumped in with the two-hit moves or the multi-hit moves. Mechanically, it is more similar to the two-hit moves so it ought to be lumped in with those, except by definition it is not a two-hit move because it hits more than twice.

To end this confusion, I propose that all non-single-hit moves fall into two categories: fixed multi-hit moves and variable multi-hit moves. Fixed multi-hit moves will be multi-hit moves that always hit the same number of times, such as Bonemerang, Double Hit, Double Kick and Triple Kick, while variable multi-hit moves will be multi-hit moves that hit different numbers of times such as Fury Attack, Rock Blast and Icicle Spear. Beat Up would probably be considered a variable multi-hit move because, though the number of times it hits isn't completely random, it isn't fixed either.

And speaking of multi-hit moves, Technician's treatment of them is a bit inconsistent.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fat DAT's current description

This Pokemon is more skilled at performing weaker moves, causing any of their attacks that normally have 6 or less Base Attack Power to have their Base Attack Power multiplied by 1.5. (e.g. Aerial Ace goes from 6 to 9, Mach Punch goes from 4 to 6, etc.) The Energy Cost for a one-hit or two-hit attack is increased by one (1). Each hit in a multi-hit move is boosted by one (1) Base Attack Power, and the Energy Cost for multi-hit attacks is increased by two (2). Because Technician is a multiplier on single hit moves, its effect is applied to Base Attack Power before any additive effects. Technician only applies to combos in the rare case that an initial hit will have 6 or less BAP.

If two-hit moves and multi-hit moves are distinct categories, this description suggests that:

Single-hit moves with BAP <= 6 have their BAP multiplied by 50% and their energy cost increased by 1
Two-hit moves with BAP per hit <=6 (in other words, all two-hit moves) have their BAP per hit increased by 50% (when you consider the total BAP of two-hit moves is >6, this turns out to be a lot) and their energy cost increased by 1
Three-hit moves with BAP her hit <=6 (in other words, all three-hit moves) have their BAP per hit increased by 50% and their energy cost unchanged
Multi-hit moves have their BAP per hit increased by 1 (which is the same as 50% for ones with 2 BAP per hit, but less than 50% for ones with more than that) and their energy cost increased by 2

This means overall, two-hit moves and three-hit moves get a much better deal on the whole than single-hit and multi-hit moves, since they have their BAP increased by more than what a single-hit move could have its BAP increased by, but for less energy cost increase than multi-hit moves. This does not make sense. Why do some kinds of moves that hit more than once get better treatment than others when fundamentally all multi-hit moves are the same except for the fact that some hit different amounts of times than others (which is not even a relevant difference given the BAP of all multi-hit moves)?

Therefore, I propose this description for Technician:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fat Objection's proposed description

This Pokemon is more skilled at performing weaker moves, causing any of their single-hit attacks that normally have 6 or less Base Attack Power to have their Base Attack Power multiplied by 1.5. (e.g. Aerial Ace goes from 6 to 9, Mach Punch goes from 4 to 6, etc.) The Energy Cost for a single-hit, two-hit or three-hit attack is increased by one (1). Each hit in a two-hit, three-hit or multi-hit move is boosted by one (1) Base Attack Power, and the Energy Cost for multi-hit attacks is increased by two (2). Because Technician is a multiplier on single-hit moves, its effect is applied to Base Attack Power before any additive effects. Technician only applies to combos in the rare case that an initial hit will have 6 or less BAP.

Or, here's one using the new terminology I proposed above:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fat Objection's proposed description

This Pokemon is more skilled at performing weaker moves, causing any of their single-hit attacks that normally have 6 or less Base Attack Power to have their Base Attack Power multiplied by 1.5. (e.g. Aerial Ace goes from 6 to 9, Mach Punch goes from 4 to 6, etc.) The Energy Cost for a single-hit or fixed multi-hit attack is increased by one (1). Each hit in a fixed multi-hit move or variable multi-hit move is boosted by one (1) Base Attack Power, and the Energy Cost for variable multi-hit attacks is increased by two (2). Because Technician is a multiplier on single-hit moves, its effect is applied to Base Attack Power before any additive effects. Technician only applies to combos in the rare case that an initial hit will have 6 or less BAP.

LouisCyphre · May 11th, 2012, 5:44:55 PM

14:37 Lou you know what would make choice items much less shitty
14:37 Dummy007 Take AP Pokemon
14:37 Aweshucks dude... that would be an amazing class
14:37 Lou if they gave you the appropriate stat boost, but forced you to move first every round
14:37 Pwnemon what, lou
14:37 Lou instead of locking in one move
14:38 Dummy007 Agreed
14:38 Pwnemon that would be actually v good
14:38 Pwnemon ask deck about that
14:38 Lou proposing it

Proposed change to Choice items:

Rather than locking a mon in to a single move, they should instead be forced to order first each round. There should also be some manner of corresponding nerf to Choice-Trick, since that would become quite overpowering, forcing a foe to order first each round.

For example:

Choice Band: Increases the Attack of the Pokemon by half of its current rank, rounded up. The Pokémon is greatly empowered, but requires further guidance from its trainer, necessitating that it be given orders first each round. If, in a multi-battle, only part of a team is Choiced, only those members are given orders first, with the others alternating normally. If a Choice item is moved given to an opponent of the original holder, the opponent gains a stat boost but can still order second every other round as normal

Feel free to point stuff out; this is only a starting point.

SimonSays · May 11th, 2012, 5:52:05 PM

The problem with that is if your opponent wants to switch, they're not able to. It also takes away from the spirit of the Choice Items: That you can only use 1 move.

Pwnemon · May 11th, 2012, 5:57:18 PM

[5:40pm] Pwnemon: since asb is so reliant on status moves, locking yourself in for a round is virtually unacceptable

Choice items are literally never used nowadays because they suck so terrible. While it is true that the old definition is more in line with the idea of "choice item," it's not as if other items haven't been completely revamped in order to make them more applicable to this format. It wouldn't be hard to find a fix to the problem with switching; as lou said, this is only a starting point

**Deck Knight** · May 12th, 2012, 1:12:46 PM

RE: Technician:

Triple Kick is the only relevant move and it's a multi-hit move. Tech increases each hit by 1, so Triple Kick has 3-3-3 or 9 Total BAP, Contrasted with Double Kick's 4+4 or 8 Total BAP. So TK has 1 more BAP while DK has more Accuracy. Not that Hitmontop learns DK.

RE: Choice Items:

Having Attack disadvantage every round is arguably worse than being locked into one attack each round, and in any case it's immune to Disable, Imprison, Encore, etc. I'm not sure how I can improve it, save make it so that it ignores the dampening effect of Ranks above 5 for damage. That and increase Choice Scarf to 2x speed instead of 1.5x Speed to make it better than a +1 Speed Boost. I can make this more explicit though.

LouisCyphre · May 12th, 2012, 1:15:54 PM

That'd be a welcome start. The only thing that matters is that Choice Items become in some way viable. The "ignores ranks dampening" would go a long way in helping things like Choice Band Haxorus put the fear of God in the opponent, as they do in-game.

E: So with Deck's proposed Choice Band, CB Adamant Haxorus hits 11 Attack, which is the same as it did before. However, before, it was +13.5 Damage, and now it's +16.5. Is that enough to make locking in like that worth it? It makes new CB Dragon Claw almost as good as old CB Outrage.

Gerard · May 12th, 2012, 1:46:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fat SimonSays

The problem with that is if your opponent wants to switch, they're not able to.

I really thing this should not be the case, I mean you should be able to switch if you're going second, just not after the opponent has ordered, so you either call switch before orders (like after your opponent has ordered or right after the round has been reffed) or you do something like sending a PM to our ref to make him aware of the intended switch, that way you're able to switch anytime but you're not allowed to just switch to avoid you opponents actions

Objection · May 12th, 2012, 2:38:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fat Gerard

I really thing this should not be the case, I mean you should be able to switch if you're going second, just not after the opponent has ordered, so you either call switch before orders (like after your opponent has ordered or right after the round has been reffed) or you do something like sending a PM to our ref to make him aware of the intended switch, that way you're able to switch anytime but you're not allowed to just switch to avoid you opponents actions

Too complicated and too prone to abuse; did not implement.

Seriously, what is stopping someone from posting a set of orders mere minutes after the reffing just to stop the other guy from switching out? And since when is this kind of "speed posting" supposed to be a strategy? Furthermore, how would you even be able to keep track of and enforce this if you have the PM option?

Gerard · May 12th, 2012, 3:38:51 PM

That's the reason I wasn't to sure about the fast posting option, but the PM one is that: you Order, and then (since you were ordering first) you have a little time before the ref completes the round, so you at least have enough time for a "After this round I'll be switching Milotic" PM, this way after the round ends, if the Pokemon is still alive then the ref (at the end of the post) posts about the switching, so that the opponent doesn't post actions until it's over, remember this is after giving up being second so it's not really something very overpowered, and it's likely to only be used in battles were the Pokemon is in a very bad match up

Flamestrike · May 12th, 2012, 3:49:22 PM

The reason why I'd prefer to keep it as-is is because right now the option to switch gives the player ordering first an advantage over the player ordering second since they have the option to either get a better Pokemon matchup or force the opponent to order first. Seeing as in every other way shape and form the player ordering second has the advantage, I think this is fair.

Apr 5th, 2012, 4:53:34 PM	#31
Alchemator my god if you don't have an iced tea for me when i come back i'm gonna flip Join Date: Feb 2009 Posts: 3,762 Zrack attack!	No? Traditionally RP development takes place in social groups anyway, especially for something like that. Discuss it here or in a group, and once you've done some work to show how it'll be set out and such we can consider approving it. Personally I don't see the idea of a 'mon of the week' and such working: ASB isn't detailed enough to have huge discussions (What do you do against Metagross? Oh I Fiery Dance...) A database of mon reviews could be promising though. __________________ Twitter \| Blog

Apr 5th, 2012, 4:57:33 PM	#32
Deck Knight Jigen Makkoto Moderator Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 6,843 Massachusetts	I was actually planning to start up a Pokemon of the Week after reading the census and choosing a fairly cool middling mon. Then I had a lot of CAP Proper drama to resolve so it kind of got shunted to the side. In any case, "If Fully Paralyzed aX, use Y aX+1" is perfectly reasonable as a chance sub. __________________ [17:53] <&Deck_Knight> If I Cite and Prune CiteandPrune's post, what does that make me? [17:54] <Birkal> a citeandprune cite and prunner [17:54] <%DHR> O_o lol [17:54] <+Mos_Quitoxe> Cite and Prune doesn't do enough of either [17:55] <+Mos_Quitoxe> can we make him change it or force him to pay damages [17:55] <&Deck_Knight> It would be a lot easier for him to Cite and Prune if we made him a mod. [17:56] <&Deck_Knight> I delegate this task to Birkal. [17:57] <Birkal> >:\|

Apr 6th, 2012, 3:25:50 PM	#33
smashlloyd20 Join Date: Aug 2010 Posts: 2,814 Erry day im HEAD SMASHING	Okay, so I think it's becoming kind of clear that at the moment, even with the fixed arenas, gyms are kinda sorta very broken. Not a single leader has lost a match yet (or will lose any of their upcoming matches). Quoting Korski's post in the main gyms thread; "50% should be a goal, not a minimum." The gym system SHOULD be designed to give the challenger and the GL both a good chance of winning. The way it's set up now is basically to give as many advantages to the GL as possible. Ignoring the arenas, I think a big point here is the B8P3 advantage the GLs get. It's sound logic for normal Pokemon, but in ASB the massive variety of moves and Abilities available to each Pokemon just makes this system overkill. With 8 Pokemon that share one (possibly secondary) typing, it's easy for the GL to counterteam the challenger, not the other way around. Perhaps changing this to B6P3 or so would help alleviate challengers getting counterteamed by GLs. __________________ Ten million fireflies

Apr 7th, 2012, 12:00:58 PM	#34
Alchemator my god if you don't have an iced tea for me when i come back i'm gonna flip Join Date: Feb 2009 Posts: 3,762 Zrack attack!	I'd agree that gyms are somewhat broken at the moment, but I'd put that more down to the arenas than the choice of Pokémon. Plus, the pool of battles hasn't been great so far: they've all been against strong types with strong gym leaders. Many have challenged without due preparations, and those that had prepared have either been unlucky or played badly (e.g. Kaxtar, sorry man!). I'd hold out for a while yet before passing definite judgement, but I'm pretty sure the problem lies in the arenas. __________________ Twitter \| Blog

Apr 8th, 2012, 6:35:28 PM	#35
smashlloyd20 Join Date: Aug 2010 Posts: 2,814 Erry day im HEAD SMASHING	Okay, so with the advent of Atheno's new gym I have a bit more to say on the topic of gym brokenness. Basically, both sides are B8P3, the arena has some (but not overpowering) Water advantages, and the opponent's team must share one common type. While I don't exactly agree with the one common type thing (perhaps B5P3 with two shared types allowed?), this is a step in the right direction. I think the base disagreement here is how hard, exactly, we want gyms to be. Do we want any very good player with a strong, built-up team with a few mons effective against the gym type to be able to beat that gym? Or do we basically want only gym leaders super-effective against the gym's type, playing at the top of their game, to be able to win? Right now, the gym system is strongly tending towards the second option. Basically, the challenger has no advantages short of being able to bring whatever three Pokemon they want. But I'd argue that this may hardly matter anyway, as with the ridiculous assortment of secondary types and Abilities available to the majority of types in Pokemon, quite often the CHALLENGER can get counterteamed...not the other way around. Then there's the whole issue of the arenas, which just further the issue. tl;dr: How hard do we want the gyms to be? __________________ Ten million fireflies

Mar 27th, 2012, 12:35:31 PM	#28
Yarnus of Bethany Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 1,821 In the world, but not of the world	I like both these ideas, and would like to suggest combining them. There could be a thread where people post their articles, and then a review panel could choose one each week to sticky and to allow comments on. That would allow the articles to be both accessible and user controlled, gaining the pros of both suggestions.

Mar 30th, 2012, 4:39:06 PM	#29
Yarnus of Bethany Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 1,821 In the world, but not of the world	No feedback on any of these three ideas?

Apr 5th, 2012, 4:42:38 PM	#30
Yarnus of Bethany Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 1,821 In the world, but not of the world	If nobody forbids, I think I will post a new discussion thread on this topic. Is that all right?

Apr 8th, 2012, 10:35:59 PM	#36
typon77 Join Date: May 2011 Posts: 1,378	I could not agree with smash more. Most gym arena's themselves would be fine considering the leaders HAVE to use a monotype team, and without some boosts they would get screwed. However, B8P3 lets them respond to such a huge variety of threats that the challenger can bring. Since most Gym's do a coin toss for who sends out first, if the challenger has to send out first, the leader almost always has a good counter to that mon, and can respond quickly and gain an early advantage. This isnt saying its easy for the challenger if they order second, as they can easily judge which Pokemon of their 8 is best to take on any of a set of 3. Lowering the amount of pokemon the Gym Leaders could bring could help, but I think that letting the challengers bring more than 3 pokemon could have an even greater impact. This would prevent the challenger from getting counterteamed, as smash said, as they would have more options to respond to the variety that each leader has. __________________ CAP ASB Team \| Reffing Profile i asked for an adamant orb but they traded me an adamant voltorb how can i report htem

Apr 13th, 2012, 4:44:36 PM	#37
Gerard Join Date: Feb 2011 Posts: 2,986 Mmm... Ice Cream!	Since pokes can get tutor moves from old releases, why not let them get moves that they can use in the anime but can't learn in-game The moves are just a few adds to a cuple of pokemon (if you saw the list you probably noticed how must stuff is useless), but it gives a couple of mons a few new tricks or coverage: FE list Pinsir - Tackle Raticate - Jump Kick Venusaur - Whirlwind, Dig Lickilicky - Tackle Beedrill - Tackle Charizard - Tackle Victreebel - Tackle Arbok - Tackle Nidoking - Fury Swipes, Bite Raichu - Leer, Tackle Typhlosion - Agility Feraligtr - Tackle Wobbuffet - Bide Umbreon - Agility Poliwrath - Tackle Steelix - Wrap Parasect - Sleep Powder Dragonite - Whirlwind Crobat - SonicBoom Tyranitar - Harden Swellow - Gust Sableye - Lick Delcatty - Fury Swipes Dustox - Stun Spore Jirachi - Teleport Gengar - Confusion Rayquaza - Seismic Toss Staraptor - Gust Mothim - Supersonic Fearrow - Gust Girafarig - Bite Froslass - Slash Dusknoir - Rapid Spin Regigigas - Hammer Arm Claydol - Shock Wave Uxie - Teleport Mespirit - Teleport Chimecho - Sing Kricketune - Bullet Seed Unown - Psychic Ursaring - Pound Unfezant - Wing Attack Lunatone - Moonlight Using this as anime precedence it's easy to see how this pokes would be able to learn this moves

Apr 23rd, 2012, 3:54:25 AM	#38
EndQuote Join Date: May 2011 Posts: 2,287	Because of this battle, I have a suggestion. In a Doubles battle, when Protect is shifted to an ally, it should count as a protective move used by that ally. (Meaning the ally should not be able to immediately Protect/Detect/Evasive Agility/Evasive Teleport/Dodge the action afterward) Otherwise, you get ridiculous Perish Song run-out-the-clock battles, like the aforementioned one. When one player hasn't got a prayer of winning, no matter what they do, something is seriously wrong. EDIT: @Lou, Fang does know Roar. He's also Taunted. Not too much help, that. So, as it turns out, Volt Switch and U-Turn remove enemy-inflicted Perish Song, which is a perfectly logical way to solve the aforementioned problem. So ignore this post... __________________ My CAP ASB team . My Reffing Profile . My Scramble Compendium . Last edited by EndQuote; May 11th, 2012 at 7:51:00 PM.

Apr 23rd, 2012, 6:00:31 AM	#39
LouisCyphre heralds disaster. Join Date: May 2010 Posts: 2,161 fucking majestic	Buy Roar for Feraligatr. You can Roar your ally to get rid of their foe-inflicted Perish Count. Hope that helps. __________________ (CAP ASB \| ASB Ref \| Battle Pike \| ASB Labyrinth \| ASB Inquisition) I will be back this Sunday. 15:31 <DHR> isnt cocke supposed to go up your nose?

Apr 24th, 2012, 9:30:05 AM	#40
Athenodoros Official Smogon Know-It-All Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 4,704 It was in my sleeve the WHOLE TIME!	As far as I can tell SDS's sub revamp is not in any of the main data threads. It should be. EDIT: Didn't see that. Although it is a weird place for it, given the players need it just as much as refs. Seems like a DAT thing to me. __________________ I mentioned that I wasn't going to be on much because the new house has no interwebz, but it now turns out it could be any time until the 4th of April, which means (weirdly) that I'll mostly be available whenever I'm at university - not so much during the weekends and nights. But I'll see what I can do. EDIT: Fucking Hard Drive broke. IRC doesn't look like it's going to happen for a while. Last edited by Athenodoros; Apr 24th, 2012 at 11:34:24 AM.

May 11th, 2012, 5:44:55 PM	#42
LouisCyphre heralds disaster. Join Date: May 2010 Posts: 2,161 fucking majestic	14:37 Lou you know what would make choice items much less shitty 14:37 Dummy007 Take AP Pokemon 14:37 Aweshucks dude... that would be an amazing class 14:37 Lou if they gave you the appropriate stat boost, but forced you to move first every round 14:37 Pwnemon what, lou 14:37 Lou instead of locking in one move 14:38 Dummy007 Agreed 14:38 Pwnemon that would be actually v good 14:38 Pwnemon ask deck about that 14:38 Lou proposing it Proposed change to Choice items: Rather than locking a mon in to a single move, they should instead be forced to order first each round. There should also be some manner of corresponding nerf to Choice-Trick, since that would become quite overpowering, forcing a foe to order first each round. For example: Choice Band: Increases the Attack of the Pokemon by half of its current rank, rounded up. The Pokémon is greatly empowered, but requires further guidance from its trainer, necessitating that it be given orders first each round. If, in a multi-battle, only part of a team is Choiced, only those members are given orders first, with the others alternating normally. If a Choice item is moved given to an opponent of the original holder, the opponent gains a stat boost but can still order second every other round as normal Feel free to point stuff out; this is only a starting point. __________________ (CAP ASB \| ASB Ref \| Battle Pike \| ASB Labyrinth \| ASB Inquisition) I will be back this Sunday. 15:31 <DHR> isnt cocke supposed to go up your nose?

May 11th, 2012, 5:52:05 PM	#43
SimonSays Join Date: Aug 2010 Posts: 1,621 Auckland, New Zealand	The problem with that is if your opponent wants to switch, they're not able to. It also takes away from the spirit of the Choice Items: That you can only use 1 move. __________________ My Tale is a Long One... I say we take all the Justin Beibers and Jersey Shore, and shoot them at the Moon with a Moon Cannon. They don't have to make it to the Moon, though. CAP ASB. The Nerds of the Nerd Community.

May 11th, 2012, 5:57:18 PM	#44
Pwnemon Join Date: Aug 2010 Posts: 3,969 Maryland	[5:40pm] Pwnemon: since asb is so reliant on status moves, locking yourself in for a round is virtually unacceptable Choice items are literally never used nowadays because they suck so terrible. While it is true that the old definition is more in line with the idea of "choice item," it's not as if other items haven't been completely revamped in order to make them more applicable to this format. It wouldn't be hard to find a fix to the problem with switching; as lou said, this is only a starting point __________________ [11:56pm] Pwnemon: statutory rape and all [11:56pm] bmelts: i have such a huge boner right now [9:28pm] Kadew: pwnemon that signature is like an x marking the spot of treasure, except instead of treasure its a pile of humorous garbage that turtles crapped out

May 12th, 2012, 1:12:46 PM	#45
Deck Knight Jigen Makkoto Moderator Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 6,843 Massachusetts	RE: Technician: Triple Kick is the only relevant move and it's a multi-hit move. Tech increases each hit by 1, so Triple Kick has 3-3-3 or 9 Total BAP, Contrasted with Double Kick's 4+4 or 8 Total BAP. So TK has 1 more BAP while DK has more Accuracy. Not that Hitmontop learns DK. RE: Choice Items: Having Attack disadvantage every round is arguably worse than being locked into one attack each round, and in any case it's immune to Disable, Imprison, Encore, etc. I'm not sure how I can improve it, save make it so that it ignores the dampening effect of Ranks above 5 for damage. That and increase Choice Scarf to 2x speed instead of 1.5x Speed to make it better than a +1 Speed Boost. I can make this more explicit though. __________________ [17:53] <&Deck_Knight> If I Cite and Prune CiteandPrune's post, what does that make me? [17:54] <Birkal> a citeandprune cite and prunner [17:54] <%DHR> O_o lol [17:54] <+Mos_Quitoxe> Cite and Prune doesn't do enough of either [17:55] <+Mos_Quitoxe> can we make him change it or force him to pay damages [17:55] <&Deck_Knight> It would be a lot easier for him to Cite and Prune if we made him a mod. [17:56] <&Deck_Knight> I delegate this task to Birkal. [17:57] <Birkal> >:\|

May 12th, 2012, 1:15:54 PM	#46
LouisCyphre heralds disaster. Join Date: May 2010 Posts: 2,161 fucking majestic	That'd be a welcome start. The only thing that matters is that Choice Items become in some way viable. The "ignores ranks dampening" would go a long way in helping things like Choice Band Haxorus put the fear of God in the opponent, as they do in-game. E: So with Deck's proposed Choice Band, CB Adamant Haxorus hits 11 Attack, which is the same as it did before. However, before, it was +13.5 Damage, and now it's +16.5. Is that enough to make locking in like that worth it? It makes new CB Dragon Claw almost as good as old CB Outrage. __________________ (CAP ASB \| ASB Ref \| Battle Pike \| ASB Labyrinth \| ASB Inquisition) I will be back this Sunday. 15:31 <DHR> isnt cocke supposed to go up your nose? Last edited by LouisCyphre; May 12th, 2012 at 1:55:41 PM.

May 12th, 2012, 3:38:51 PM	#49
Gerard Join Date: Feb 2011 Posts: 2,986 Mmm... Ice Cream!	That's the reason I wasn't to sure about the fast posting option, but the PM one is that: you Order, and then (since you were ordering first) you have a little time before the ref completes the round, so you at least have enough time for a "After this round I'll be switching Milotic" PM, this way after the round ends, if the Pokemon is still alive then the ref (at the end of the post) posts about the switching, so that the opponent doesn't post actions until it's over, remember this is after giving up being second so it's not really something very overpowered, and it's likely to only be used in battles were the Pokemon is in a very bad match up

May 12th, 2012, 3:49:22 PM	#50
Flamestrike Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 2,563	The reason why I'd prefer to keep it as-is is because right now the option to switch gives the player ordering first an advantage over the player ordering second since they have the option to either get a better Pokemon matchup or force the opponent to order first. Seeing as in every other way shape and form the player ordering second has the advantage, I think this is fair. __________________ Nuzlocke Thread! The latest update for my Diamond challenge is here CAP ASB Team