|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#26 |
|
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 12
Bolton, England
|
Weezing at #40 :O
It has incredible physical bulk, Has access to will-o-wisp as well as toxic, access to clear smog which destroys pretty much any stat boosting pokemon, use of pain split for recovery. IMO Weezing should be safely finding it's spot in the top 20.
__________________
Pokemon showdown Username: FatFlareon Getting the hang of competitive battling now :3 |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
If happy ever after did exist
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 569
I'm at a payphone!
|
Quote:
__________________
Message me for NU RMT rates! PU: Pokemon Database The PU Viability Rankings PU- NU in NU PU Research Week Project PU |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Matchups against top 20 pokemon; fairly long
Overall, it does pretty well. However, there are a few things you must note: 1) The Pokemon that Weezing doesn't beat tend to be threatening Pokemon that are able to take advantage of Weezing's presence. 2) Weezing doesn't have reliable recovery. 3) Weezing relies on Will-o-Wisp hitting for it to beat most of the Pokemon that it can check. 4) There are quite a few other really good Poison-types in the tier and you don't want to use more than one Poison-type on most teams (unless one of the Poison-types is Skuntank) otherwise you will be too weak to the omnipresent Psychic-types. 5) Quite a few of the Pokemon Weezing can beat can beat Weezing if they use a certain set. I'd say 40 is a good spot for it, maybe a little higher, but top 20 is a bit much. There are so many other viable Pokemon in the tie to use. Offensive SubSplit Weezing is pretty cool, but it's much less reliable at beating Pokemon such as Sawk. Last edited by DTC; Oct 6th, 2012 at 10:20:12 PM. Reason: typos |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|