|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Give me the number for 911!
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 541
USA
|
Thumbs up for Simisage? I know this Pokemon sucks generally, but there has been one set that I have used pretty effectively lately. This is my first indicidual set thing so if the format is wrong, I apologize. One more reject and this is gone though. [SET] name: All-Out Attacker move 1: Leaf Storm move 2: Focus Blast move 3: Hidden Power Rock / Hidden Power Ice move 4: Giga Drain item: Life Orb ability: Gluttony nature: Timid evs: 4 HP / 252 SpA / 252 Spe Why this deserves to be on-site
__________________
![]() kawakimi: UR DUM kawakimi: N WEIRD Completed Analyses: 16 In Progress: 2 Last edited by Swamp-Rocket; Oct 7th, 2012 at 11:05:32 PM. Reason: I Murdered Choice Specs |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
I'm a leaf on the wind; watch how i soar
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
im disappointed that this hasn't received any checks yet, I find this set intriguing. I'll try it out as soon as I get steady internet back, i think HP Ice has more viability than HP Rock overall though. Only testing will tell. I'd like other QC members to check this set as well.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Give me the number for 911!
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 541
USA
|
Bumping. Someone else please look at this set.
__________________
![]() kawakimi: UR DUM kawakimi: N WEIRD Completed Analyses: 16 In Progress: 2 |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Skylight sucks
|
Just out of curiosity, why are you using Gluttony over Overgrow? In the event of it getting onto low health (Those defences though :x). You're not really using a berry so I'd much rather prefer the Overgrow boost to Giga Drain / Leaf Storm.
EDIT - Justy realised OVergrow isn't released Could Expert Belt be used? seems like it has solid coverage Also, maybe HP Fighting (assuimng it hits anythiing significant harder?) Last edited by FireMage; Oct 7th, 2012 at 2:48:08 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
I'm a leaf on the wind; watch how i soar
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I'm really unsure on this set, it isn't bad, but I think it would be better to just slash Leaf Storm with Nasty Plot on the NP set, since they play similarly (when I play with the Simi's I only boost when I know I can get a sweep). How does this play differently from the NP set to deserve its own set?
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Give me the strength to part this sea
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 534
PM/VM me for an NU rate! Also part of NU QC VM me for a check!
|
I'm not sure why I'd use this set over NP tbh. I mean yeah it has a powerful Leaf Storm but thats really not the best move to be locked into when Amoonguss is absolutely everywhere. Not to mention it gives one of the biggest threats in the tier, SubBU Braviary, free set up. I really don't see the point of this set so unless I can be convinced of it(good reasons, logs, etc) I'm gonna have to give this set a no for the time being.
QC Rejected 1/3 Edit: I was told 2 rejections by razzle dazzle unless he was lying to me??!?!?!?!!!?!?! Last edited by Zebraiken; Oct 7th, 2012 at 5:36:53 PM. Reason: he was lying to you |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
(macho) brace yourselves
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 853
|
This set would have been more viable before Regenerator Amoonguss was released, but with it being the most popular defensive Pokemon in the tier (and it also being notoriously hard to trap and eliminate), I'm also doubting the viability of Leaf Storm over Nasty Plot. Choice Specs in particular is a terrible idea given that Simipour's STAB attack is easy to switch into, especially with Leaf Storm's drawback, and that its coverage moves are also easily exploitable (Focus Blast lets Musharna / Gardevoir set up, gives Haunter a free Sub, etc, while Hidden Power is set up fodder for a whole mess of things) . For comparison, I highly doubt even Choice Specs Sceptile would see much use in the metagame due to the plethora of both defensive and offensive responses available to it on most teams. Leaf Storm admittedly has a niche of hitting fast offensive switch-ins, that would normally be able to abuse Simisage's tendency to setup immediately, very hard. However, I don't think that's enough to warrant more than a sentence or two of discussion in OO.
It's a shame, because I used a set very similar to this in the Winter 2011 metagame, and it was great. Sadly, the metagame has really turned against Simisage and offensive Grass-types in general. The only terribly successful candidates at the moment are Exeggutor, which has a powerful super effective STAB vs Amoonguss, and Ludicolo, which is largely known as a Water-type with a great secondary STAB option. I'm flat out rejecting Choice Specs, and while the Life Orb set is good, Leaf Storm is the only difference, and you can sum up the change to Simisage's playstyle in a few sentences, tops. It's worth an SCMS edit, but not much more imo. QC REJECTED 2/3 (I thought we needed three rejections in the past?) Last edited by erisia; Oct 7th, 2012 at 4:37:17 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
yellow!
![]()
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 713
|
Life Orb set is actually decent etc and I think playing hit-and-run is so much better than boosting mainly because NP Simisage gets equally owned by Amoonguss?
You guys are talking about flaws of Simisage, not the flaws of this set. NP set has little chance to set up anyways, so why not give it an extra option of a hit-and-run play? Yeah if this has Specs as main option, I am giving it a reject 3/3. Only giving it a second chance for the LO set
__________________
~
![]() ~ |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
I'm a leaf on the wind; watch how i soar
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I agree with Amarillo. I don't think this deserves its own set, but it should be combined with Nasty Plot at the very least.
With Amoonguss around, a boosting grass-type that can't even hurt it at +2 doesn't sound very effective. Choice Specs shouldn't be mentioned, but a LO 4 attack set is probably more effective than the NP set in this meta. I still need to test it more before knowing for sure, but please test the set before rejecting it. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Give me the number for 911!
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 541
USA
|
Okay, I'm making Life Orb the only option here.
If it gets merged with the NP set that's fine too tbh. I agree that they don't play that much differently. I see how Specs sucks now as well.
__________________
![]() kawakimi: UR DUM kawakimi: N WEIRD Completed Analyses: 16 In Progress: 2 |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
why not just do a revamp of this analysis? i'm pretty sure we can all agree that subseed simisage is bad and a few qc members think that np and all-out-attacker should be merged. i think so too.
the overview of the old analysis is not so great; it just talks about how simisage compares with other grass-types. it barely talks about anything else besides its high speed and nasty plot |
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
I'm a leaf on the wind; watch how i soar
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
(macho) brace yourselves
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 853
|
Yeah, overall I think just doing a revamp with the above set would be a good idea. Nasty Plot can either be slashed with Leaf Storm or OO material depending on your opinion. As stated, the overview needs re-doing, and the C&C needs some work as well.
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Give me the number for 911!
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 541
USA
|
Sorry about the late post.
I guess I will try out a Revamp at Simisage - it seriously is hindered by Amoonguss and needs to be written with that in mind, but can be effective otherwise. I'm going to do a seperate thread for the revamp. When that skeleton gets this should probably be moved to L&O. But yeah I'm perfectly fine with doing a revamp.
__________________
![]() kawakimi: UR DUM kawakimi: N WEIRD Completed Analyses: 16 In Progress: 2 |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
yellow!
![]()
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 713
|
So if he's going for a revamp, would this be locked?
__________________
~
![]() ~ |
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|