|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1326 |
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 326
Louisiana
|
Luxray looks way to dark to be "light type".
I would hate a new typing and if it goes the way people are saying it'll be abysmal. Something resisting dragons 1. Defeats the point of a dragon typing as dragons are supposed to be OP (to be blunt as I have to leave for work) and 2. Then they become the new dragon type. Also people saying it should be SE against Dark... because those dark types are so centralizing... Yep... EDIT: I know a new type if very unlikely and GF doesn't care about the metagame but I only bring up the metagame b/c people want a new type primarily for this reason. (Read primarily, not solely). PS. Hoping for a dark/bug. |
|
|
|
|
#1327 |
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,076
I HATE COD
|
Aww man, we need to be able to like posts in these forums! xD
Light type is not imagintive enough - at all. I mean, come on, light is super-effective on dark and ghost types, electric types are immune to it (they either permanently have their own light (ampharos) or can generate it) and the first light type move would be flash! I much prefer the paint type, the only paint type pokemon are smeargle, smealla (female smeargle forms) Smelli (Smeargle's baby pre-evolution) and elgrames (Smeargle's evolution, he gets into uber). The new paint type move, which is signature to Smelli and it's evolutions, is 'easel', which has 235 base power (excluding STAB) and fixes into whatever the secondary type of the pokemon it just hit with easel is, if the target is pure type then it remains paint type. The move reverts back to paint type if Smelli, Smeargle, Smealla, or elgrames switches out. Personally, I think that paint type blows saint, digital and light type out of the water! :)
__________________
"Oh no, we're not lost it's just that we don't know where we are" - Brock 19:59 Darknesscrusher Just watch fucking porn man 19:59 Darknesscrusher Lesbo is better anyway |
|
|
|
|
#1328 | |
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 6,605
|
Quote:
t o l d |
|
|
|
|
|
#1329 | ||
|
I could be banned!
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 618
From the House of Precious
|
Quote:
Why would you ever want solarbeam to change attributes? As an Ivysaur trainer, wouldn't you want grass types to hold onto that? If the space type became a reality, why would Beheeyem be a light type instead? Furthermore! Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#1330 |
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,076
I HATE COD
|
Well... why would he move all four of his legs in such style as a normal quadruped would in the trailer?
__________________
"Oh no, we're not lost it's just that we don't know where we are" - Brock 19:59 Darknesscrusher Just watch fucking porn man 19:59 Darknesscrusher Lesbo is better anyway |
|
|
|
|
#1331 |
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 78
|
Light type isn't needed because it's already covered by everything else. The light type could represent one of 2 things. Literal light, or the metaphorical, pure and noble sense of light. The former is covered by Fire (maybe), Electric, Psychic, Ice, and Normal attacks. The latter is covered mainly by Fighting, though Psychic, and Normal can also be argued. If you want light just to be an opposite of Dark, then that is once again already covered by Fighting types. Dark represents evil (literally, it's called Evil type in Japan), and fighting dirty (Beat-up, Pursuit). Fighting types fight fairly using proper techniques. Hence why Fighting beats Dark, because they are properly trained and don't fall for petty tricks.
|
|
|
|
|
#1332 | |
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,076
I HATE COD
|
Quote:
Seriously, why can't we like posts on forums!? I've always wondered why fighting is super-effective on dark, I knew that dark meant evil and all that but I still never figured out why fighting beat dark. I now know why every type is super-effective or not-very-effective on another type, thanks!
__________________
"Oh no, we're not lost it's just that we don't know where we are" - Brock 19:59 Darknesscrusher Just watch fucking porn man 19:59 Darknesscrusher Lesbo is better anyway |
|
|
|
|
|
#1333 | |
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 277
Sigh.
|
Quote:
And I don't really know why but the blue colour on Xerneas also makes me think Electric. That, or Steel. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1334 | |
|
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 69
|
Quote:
and Solar beam should be light type because its so obvious that it should be haha. Light would be resisted by Grass, Steel, Light, Supereffective against Dark, Ghost, electric, Weak to, Grass, Dark, Psychic, resistant to. Ghost, Light |
|
|
|
|
|
#1335 | |
|
I could be banned!
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 618
From the House of Precious
|
Quote:
Here's a new thought. He's the frenchy version of the deer forest god from princess mononoke. When the forest god takes a step, life blooms under his ffet, then dies instantly. Xerneas, being an altruist, could have aquired latent psychic abilities to keep that from happening everywhere he walks. But he still need to move to get anything done. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1336 | |
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,076
I HATE COD
|
Quote:
You can say anything with 'because he's MAGIC'.
__________________
"Oh no, we're not lost it's just that we don't know where we are" - Brock 19:59 Darknesscrusher Just watch fucking porn man 19:59 Darknesscrusher Lesbo is better anyway |
|
|
|
|
|
#1337 |
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,682
|
The main reason I advocate less PP is so that you get to Struggle faster.
It would also make Pressure more competitive, in theory.
__________________
Pearl FC: 4685 0290 3336 G4 Trading SS2 FC: 1076 5964 1610 (G4 Battle FC) White FC: 1334 7033 2830 G5 Trading Black FC: 3052 6866 4059 (G5 Battle FC) My Trade Thread: http://www.smogon.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3462950 Please respond to all "CMTs" in my thread, or I won't see it! Rate my OU team: http://www.smogon.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3464802 |
|
|
|
|
#1338 | |
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,076
I HATE COD
|
Quote:
Make splash 1 PP. Also, who cares about making a certain ability more competitive which is only on ubers, vespiquen and Absol (from memory, might have forgot someone).
__________________
"Oh no, we're not lost it's just that we don't know where we are" - Brock 19:59 Darknesscrusher Just watch fucking porn man 19:59 Darknesscrusher Lesbo is better anyway |
|
|
|
|
|
#1339 |
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 277
Sigh.
|
Pressure is also useful on Kyurem. Sub/Roost sets utilise Pressure to great effect.
Last edited by Quickster; Jan 12th, 2013 at 5:29:31 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#1340 |
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 699
|
I looked through some threads in other forums back when Gen. V was announced. It seemed that people back then really saw Reshiram as the definite proof that the Light type was coming. I mean, Zekrom Dragon/Dark, Reshiram Dragon/Light. It made perfect sense, right?
Not so much. Now, those very same people are pushing the idea that Xerneas is Light type. I also seem to recall that some said Electivire would be Electric/Light (Like a lightbulb or flash of lightning) whereas Magmortar would be Fire/Light (White hot flames). For several generations, GameFreak have had plenty of opportunities to introduce that type if they had wanted to. Yet every time they have opted elsewise. What makes people think they will go for it this time (other than "They haven't yet, and this Pokémon is shining!")? |
|
|
|
|
#1341 | |
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 394
a beautiful utopia
|
Quote:
sub mons love pressure for it takes 2 pp to break their subs
__________________
frequent irc user, nu ladderer, tournament player, amchecker |
|
|
|
|
|
#1342 |
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,076
I HATE COD
|
Well, looking on their point of view, I think the legendaries suit the theory of Y is chaos and X is peace. Y is dark, evil, in darkness. X is care-free, tranquill, has seen the light.
Just a theory, but light type is still never gonna happen. I just wanted to throw something out there! |
|
|
|
|
#1343 | |
|
I could be banned!
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 618
From the House of Precious
|
Quote:
Solarbeam is fine as a grass attack, because it's an important STAB attack outside of the metagame (or at least in sunny teams, or whatever) And your type compatibilities look like something posted earlier on in the forum about how the supposed saint type would work as a supportive attribute evening itself out amongst the other attributes |
|
|
|
|
|
#1344 |
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 7
|
Finally made it through this entire forever thread, gonna throw my two cents into the maelstrom:
I started lurking on Smogon in early gen IV, and it's kinda striking how similar this thread has been to its gen V equivilent. Snivy was OBVIOUSLY going to get a secondary Dark typing, nobody thought Tepig would get its fighting type, etc. It seems like most people want the same things from gen VI as they did from V (more options for mitigating hazards, new evo's for old favorites, other things we didn't get in B&W). Of course, we also want some options for dealing with weather now, too, but most other wishes/demands seem quite familiar. As I type this, I can't help but feel like gen V was a disappointment, and it kinda was, but I loved the hell out of it anyway. I expect to feel about the same about VI. I was really dreading a gen VI announcement on Tuesday morning, but the trailer won me over. I've been saying for years that cell-shading is the way to do pokemon in 3D, and here it is. The overworld looks kinda dated to me, but the battles are perfect. Also, Evil Tail is my new fave cover legend. For real, what a great design! But here are some things I, personally, would love (but do not necessarily expect) to see: backwards compatibility (I play wifi, this is really important to me), some kind of buff for Metagross and/or Flygon (two old favorites that Gen V was not terribly kind to), cool new Eevee evolutions and maybe an evolution for Drapion. I think character customization is long overdue, and would be of some consolation to folks like me who are going to miss the sprites. Of course, I would also like to see some more options for managing hazards and weather, but maybe that goes without saying. Really looking forward to seeing what they do with the 3DS, I have an XL and its an incredible system with a lot of potential. tl;dr: I'm excited, trying not to be too cynical, but sometimes I feel like I'm reading a thread from three years ago. Here's hoping GF throws us a couple of bones in gen VI. |
|
|
|
|
#1345 |
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 438
Ever since "Location" began appearing with posts, users have filled it with witty titles. BUT NOT I!
|
More talking about the "Light" type huh? First of all, I really doubt that such a type would be based on physical light, especially considering the Dark-type we have now doesn't mean literal darkness either, but evil and sinister trickery. Look at moves like Dark Pulse (an aura of evil thoughts) or Sucker Punch (an unsuspecting sneak attack). So the rumor that started all of this theorizing called it the "saint" type, which would be a fitting opposite considering what the Dark-type stands for in Japanese.
Blazen's post was very good, I agree there, although I think Fighting is not a true opposite to Dark (at least, not in the way a virtuous "saint"-type would be). Because of that (and because I'd love to see some type-chart tweaking) I'd be in favor of this Light-type. All I ask, for goodness sake GameFreak, if you DO make a new type, let Poison hit it super-effectively, and Grass resist its attacks!
__________________
Black FC: 3739 8911 3318; HeartGold FC: 0389 1057 3667 Showdown: 5hroomz 82-40 randbat, 28-12 NU YouTube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/WaywardSquire Wifi Battle Video (49th win over Super Single Boss): 26-39851-63183 |
|
|
|
|
#1346 | |
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 17
Loving the New Starters!
|
Quote:
Edit: Did not see that there was another page, sorry.
__________________
Can't wait for Pokemon X and Y to come out! Avatar spirite done by me. Last edited by Guppin; Jan 12th, 2013 at 5:01:24 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1347 | |
|
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,114
Wherever the food is.
|
Quote:
Also, I'd love to see a Fighting/Ground type or Fighting/Electric type (with No Guard). The Fighting/Ground type would have access to powerful STABs and Stealth Rock resistance. If a Fighting/Electric type got No Guard, it would seem fitting to give it not very good stats but Dynamic Punch and Zap Cannon. Then, we'd have a Mixed Sweeper with bad stats able to run a parafusion set with powerful moves. Seems like a good balance. In terms of gimmick Pokémon, I'd love to see a Bug/Steel type with Flash Fire or something. It'd join the ranks of the Pokémon without weaknesses, and its typing is actually decent, compared to Ghost/Dark or mono-Electric. Or, a supportive Normal/Ghost or Rock/Ghost (with Solid Rock) with a massive movepool. The Normal would give it the access to the movepool, and Ghost typing is a blessing nowadays, with all the Fighting types running around. The same goes on the Rock/Ghost type, but then it would have access to Stealth Rock while being a Spinblocker. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1348 |
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,682
|
If there are reasons to do x, and no reasons not to do x, then you ought to do x. Analytic ethics for the win.
__________________
Pearl FC: 4685 0290 3336 G4 Trading SS2 FC: 1076 5964 1610 (G4 Battle FC) White FC: 1334 7033 2830 G5 Trading Black FC: 3052 6866 4059 (G5 Battle FC) My Trade Thread: http://www.smogon.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3462950 Please respond to all "CMTs" in my thread, or I won't see it! Rate my OU team: http://www.smogon.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3464802 |
|
|
|
|
#1349 |
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 6,605
|
I want the Normal/Ghost to be a paper pokémon. Thin defenses, Sniper/Super Luck and a shitload of Attack, Speed and cutting moves. Bitch gonna hurt
And seriously, why create a new type that resists Dragon. Just let Ice resist it (dragons technically are reptiles and they're cold-blooded, so it makes sense for Ice to both resist AND be strong against Dragons) and we'll be fine. They'd still be "overpowered", but we would at least have another option to beat them. |
|
|
|
|
#1350 |
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 249
Custom User Title
|
If they wanted to balance dragon types, I don't think adding one more type that resists it would fix the problem. People would still use dragons just because they're already so powerful one more resistance wouldn't change it really. The type would have to be really good, like say immune to dragon and resists fire and ground and has high base stats with super effective STAB on dragon/ground/flying, in which case you're just replacing one broken typing with another.
I guess it could work out, but it's not as simple as just adding a new type that resists dragon/is super effective on dragon and calling it a day. |
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| speculation |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|