|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Recipe for disaster
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,233
Long Island
|
21:14 Zeb i really think the best way to go with it
21:14 Zeb is to just do a joke analysis 21:14 Zeb and explain how shit it is this is still being debated so hang tight. [Overview]
[SET] name: Pivot move 1: Stealth Rock move 2: Toxic move 3: Light Screen / Reflect move 4: Meteor Mash item: Eviolite nature: Impish evs: 252 HP / 252 Def / 4 SpD [SET COMMENTS]
[ADDITIONAL COMMENTS]
[Hilarious calcs of metang 3hkoing ninjask and shit go here] Meteor Mash: 157-186 (58.14 - 68.88%) this is against eviolite hoppip, nuff' said
[Other Options]
[Checks and Counters]
__________________
16:46 <TLCNU> Esca literally is 2HKO'd by Stoutland Fire Fang 10:33 skylight molk put me in your sig ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Last edited by Molk; Jun 25th, 2012 at 11:57:27 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
to stay alive you've got to kill your mind
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Hi QC team, there's a pretty big issue that we have with Metang. DTC, tennis, and I (actually not tennis but I'm throwing him in here anyway) agreed that we should open it up to discussion amongst the QC members: Should Metang have an analysis at all? And if it does deserve one, should it be a serious analysis or a joke one?
Consider the following points: - Metang is generally accepted to be awful - Metang already has an analysis on-site - Metang has something like 3.2% usage, which is pretty high - Metang does have a few niche uses, like (paraphrasing from DTC) semi-countering Braviary and some Psychic-types, amongst other things I'd really like to strongly leave this to the QC team to sort out, although if you're not on QC and you must post something about it that provokes some discussion and isn't listed above then go ahead, sure.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 418
North Korea
|
Need a mention of Garbodor getting 3 layers easily against Metang, and possibly 1 Toxic Spikes Layer if Metang goes for SR.
Earthquake: 136-162 (37.36 - 44.5%) -- guaranteed 3HKO. Calc for reference. And we all know getting all those hazards against you is great. Quote:
__________________
16:46 <TLCNU> Esca literally is 2HKO'd by Stoutland Fire Fang Last edited by TropiOUs; May 8th, 2012 at 11:37:32 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Woof
![]()
|
Give me some rocks, iron-oxide shavings and a rock polisher; I'll make thermite in three hours.
not to be a total jerk or anything, but seriously if this thing does get an analysis it should be a joke analysis. Seriously this thing is a pile of crap. Here's my reasons for: - usage (63rd in april just missing NU cut) - - soft checking Braviary - soft checking some psychics (Eggy hates this thing) - Hazards Here's my reasons against: - lacks power - lacks speed - lacks recovery - lacks anything useful beyond setting up rocks - total set-up bait for all sorts of teams - fails to 2hko most of the tier (IT FAILS TO 2hko some ABSOL GOD DAMNIT) I believe the usage of it comes from people unaware of just how fucking bad it is. I mean sure when I first got QC I tested it, but the only reason why I remotely approved of it was because there were 200 other mons getting sets and it actually had use in checking 95% of Jynx at the time (which was and still is the only reason why I'd use it). People look at its stats and think that it's just an average mon, but when you get down to the movepool and the types of mons running around in the tier you realize that Metang is rolling further and further down the bell curve; to the point where its only shining moments are the fact that it soft checks some key mons. besides, those mons that are soft-checked can easily blow past with a decent strategy and team built around them.
__________________
![]() ![]() Pokemon Showdown! | #pokemon! | teambats! emoticons! | chat logs! | Gen VI! | roller coaster! | Henry! |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,938
|
I realize that it's weak, but it's hard to disagree with the fact that those defenses are phenomenal. Its defense score approaches that of max invested Registeel and its Special Defense score is about 5/6 of it (assuming both run 252/252+)
restalk seems less awful than lead tbh; agreeing that lead gets up rocks and sits there (and is thus a bad set). At least restalk can switch in multiple times, toxic something if it's lucky, and switch out. This thing can wall every physical attacker without setup moves bar Emboar and Rapidash, which is something. Meteor Mash / Toxic / Rest / Sleep Talk seems less terrible. In a way, it's like a Regirock with better typing and far less power. Regardless of whatever you choose to do, you shouldn't be running 4 Spe to begin with for speed creep reasons.
__________________
VGC Regionals: VGC11 Top 16, VGC12 12th Place |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
wubwubwub
![]() ![]() ![]()
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,119
wubwubwub
|
Registeel is different. At least it can use Seismic Toss to actually deal damage, and it gets Thunder Wave for support. Metang just can't hurt anything, and IT LOSES TO THE THINGS ITS SUPPOSED TO COUNTER.
But with that said, if it is actually seen in the tier then it should be given an analysis. That's the point of analyses: analyzing the pokemon in the metagame. Metang is at 3.2% usage, which is not negligible. If someone wants to do it, why not? lol
__________________
NIGMAN: JRRRR IS A SHIT NIGMAN: HO ESLE THINK IT?? |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
RIDE OR DIE MOTHERFUCKERS ᕦ(ò_óˇ)ᕤ ᕦ(ò_óˇ)ᕤ ᕦ(ò_óˇ)ᕤ
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,242
|
This is a terrible Pokemon, and its analysis should reflect that. I don't think it should be given the "full joke treatment" (by that I mean the tone of the Unown or Farfetch'd analysis), but the analysis should make it abundantly clear that the only thing Metang does good is sit there and maybe Toxic something or get up SR or tickle something's balls and the only reason it is ever considered for a teamslot is that it is a Steel-type.
__________________
ᕦ(ò_óˇ)ᕤ
ᕦ(ò_óˇ)ᕤ |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
(macho) brace yourselves
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 854
|
Let's have a look at all of the bad points about Metang.
In my opinion, Metang doesn't warrant an analysis. However, with its substantial usage, I get the feeling that there needs to be an analysis that actually discourages people from using it. It's a bad, bad pokemon, but people are still going to think "oooh, shiny!" unless we tell them otherwise. When it's usage drops, then we can remove the analysis. Also, Toxic should be slashed with Bullet Punch. It'll give Metang the option of somewhat deterring setup sweepers. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Woof
![]()
|
Erisia the only qualm I have with your post is that Blueberry Muffins are OU in the Muffin Metagame, and you're doing it and the kind people who tier them injustice. Now if you mentioned Bran Muffins...
__________________
![]() ![]() Pokemon Showdown! | #pokemon! | teambats! emoticons! | chat logs! | Gen VI! | roller coaster! | Henry! |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Laying the Groundwork for the Pound Work
![]() ![]()
|
bran muffins are great
There seems to be this idea running around in NU that any Pokemon is viable if it has access to Eviolite, which is probably why Metang is even though of being used in the first place. I guess maybe mention Zen Headbutt in the OO since it is another STAB Option, and since Bullet Punch is honestly completely worthless on this thing sometimes (though every move is worthless on a worthless Pokemon). Yeah, Metang is shit.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Metang is not bad enough for a joke analysis. Yes, it is very bad, but in the extremely rare circumstance where you need everything that Metang has to offer, it can be slightly useful. At best, it sets up Stealth Rock, kills/weakens something it actually checks, and maybe kills off something with Bullet Punch. That's enough, imo. However, emphasize that Metang should only be used when you /really/ need everything that it can offer.
It offers: 1) A wonderful defensive typing in Steel/Psychic 2) Amazing bulk 3) The ability to check most Flying-, Psychic-, and Ice-types. Also checks Pokemon such as Cincinno 4) Stealth Rock 5) Priority (albeit very weak) Of course, it also has 2 major flaws: 1) Incredibly weak 2) No recovery Those things really pull it down and makes it much worse as a Pokemon. Please make the skeleton less pretentious and sarcastic. Even as a joke analysis, it's not really funny and isn't very useful. Explain why Metang is a very bad Pokemon and should rarely ever—if ever—should be considered for a team. Also, there is no need to remove the analysis once it's up, imo. What if its usage rises up? |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
RIDE OR DIE MOTHERFUCKERS ᕦ(ò_óˇ)ᕤ ᕦ(ò_óˇ)ᕤ ᕦ(ò_óˇ)ᕤ
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,242
|
Your own wording and the rest of your post says that Metang is crap. A sarcastic tone is fine as long as Molk doesn't go too overboard with jokes (which I've been working with him on). Again, I'm not going to allow a full on Unown level joke analysis, but if Molk wants to be sarcastic in explaining why not to use Metang, I'll chalk it up to author's voice.
__________________
ᕦ(ò_óˇ)ᕤ
ᕦ(ò_óˇ)ᕤ |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
I crashed my car into the bridge, I don't care
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Super Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,529
~(^.^)~
|
I gave Molk a set to use that should use Metang to its best abilities, and not the one in the OP
[SET] name: Pivot move 1: Stealth Rock move 2: Toxic move 3: Light Screen / Reflect move 4: Meteor Mash item: Eviolite nature: Impish evs: 252 HP / 252 Def / 4 SpD Basic idea is to use it as a pivot, and not a tank. Switch it in, set up Stealth Rock, switch out to the appropriate teammate. Metang has a nice typing, use it to its advantage. It should be played a lot like Slowking or Steelix in RU. Toxic gives Metang some utility since Meteor Mash isn't doing jack shit to most opponents. Light Screen or Reflect gives it something for a teammate to use to set up and sweep the opponent; most mons in NU only need a turn of set up and Metang can give it to them. In any case, this should be the set to use if you're using Metang, and not the one in the OP, which doesn't really do anything at all. |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Recipe for disaster
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,233
Long Island
|
yeah that set might be the best way to use metang
ill test it out in the morning EDIT: Metang the best's Metang used Meteor Mash! A critical hit! [CF] Cooloolcool's Haunter lost 72% of its health! i loled
__________________
16:46 <TLCNU> Esca literally is 2HKO'd by Stoutland Fire Fang 10:33 skylight molk put me in your sig ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Last edited by Molk; May 27th, 2012 at 11:14:35 AM. Reason: this must be shared with the world |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Recipe for disaster
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,233
Long Island
|
ummmmm, so is this going to be a joke analysis or not?
i need to get to writing this either way
__________________
16:46 <TLCNU> Esca literally is 2HKO'd by Stoutland Fire Fang 10:33 skylight molk put me in your sig ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,299
|
Metang is pretty bad and is set up bait for a lot of things but so is a lot of Pokemon. Stuff like Armaldo lacking SD can't reliably spin at all, or do much damage and often just sets SR and dies in a match or gets set up on all the same. There's many more examples, e.g. Camerupt back in the day. Metang just might be a particularly bad case but its purpose is still just to get a few hits on something before dying which isn't too different from a lot of things. If certain people had a particular team that just needed something (anything) to set SR and tank a couple of hits then Metang has a unique typing that may appeal to them. Just a thought.
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
to stay alive you've got to kill your mind
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
Oglemi's set should be the way to go. I like it infinitely better than the one in the OP. At least it actually does something and provides team support... and with that set in particular, I'd really like it to be more of a legitimate analysis rather than a joke one, since that set has some (albeit minor) utility. I'll QC an updated skeleton.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|