|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#26 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 442
memory is ram
|
Ctrl+F "Giga Drain" on Victreebel's analysis yields no result anywhere on the page. I think Giga Drain deserves a slash next to (or before) Solarbeam on the Special Growth set or at least AC mention. The recovered health has been way more useful to me then the power Solarbeam provides, and has aloud me to sweep later on in the game. (It also works outside of sun which has been useful too)
Last edited by Keiran; Apr 1st, 2012 at 3:56:19 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#28 | ||||
|
am i the only one i know?
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
If anyone else has some small changes they need to make to an analysis, go ahead and post here!
__________________
![]() |
||||
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 42
|
Speaking of Garbodor, what was wrong with its old, optimistic analysis? I don't read the strategy dex to hear how hard something sucks and that i'd be stupid to use it in any tier I want. I just want to know the best things it can do. Even if that isn't much, is "MAN WHAT A PIECE OF CRAP" type commentary necessary? Anything can fit on *some* team.
__________________
Webmaster of the Insidious Bogleech! |
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
(macho) brace yourselves
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 854
|
Quote:
Frankly, I feel like updating it solely to re-write it. We shouldn't have pretentious stuff like that on-site, especially when it's badmouthing the best Toxic Spiker in the tier (aside from Omanyte, of course) Last edited by erisia; Apr 23rd, 2012 at 9:57:55 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 42
|
Articles for NU pokemon should be written from the perspective that NU is just another tier, which it is. Some seem to be painting it as a shameful dumping ground nobody wants to play.
__________________
Webmaster of the Insidious Bogleech! |
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
yellow!
![]()
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 713
|
For Shelgon, I feel that DD RestTalk set is the better set of the two. Not only does it maintain similar physical bulk, it can now get rid of status + pose an offensive threat. Even with no investment attack, it can rip through the tier after some boosts (and those defensive enough are often setup bait) bar Tangela + Quagsire. Wish+Protect has really small wishes, so that's not much of a plus, either. Toxic hits Tangela and Quagsire, but really the defensive set doesn't even necessarily draw them out, as uninvested Dragon Claw is kind of silly.
Also, I know it has no technical bearing on the issue, but UU and RU both has DD RestTalk over the defensive wish set. I know there's a lot of updates going on, but I feel that this is just a minor issue that doesn't really deserve a full revamp (and also I don't like how it says Probopass beats DD RestTalk when the only thing it does is give it an automatic +6 +6 setup and it can just start outraging without lock-in, but that's easily fixed.) |
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 148
|
Speaking of Shelgon, its analysis mentions that it will never beat Bastidon or Probopass which isn't true at all. Probopass can't do a damn thing (unless it gets really, really lucky with earth power special defense drops) to Shelgon while Shelgon sets up to +6 and 2HKOs it. Bastidon fares better because of roar but in a 1v1 situation Shelgon will win because Bastiodon can't directly harm it at all.
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Laying the Groundwork for the Pound Work
![]() ![]()
|
For Muk, since there is an analysis already on site, can I base the framework around that? Or rwould you like me to start from scratch?
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
am i the only one i know?
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
As far as Shelgon goes, I'll look into that later today.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1
Australia
|
For Castform's entry, shouldn't Thunder be slashed over Thunderbolt, because it hits a lot harder than the latter, and in rain, it has perfect accuracy?
Also, I think the items Damp Rock and Heat Rock should be mentioned as other options. [Oh, and yes, I know that Castform's entry is joke-ish in nature; I just see some room for improvement... and I apologise if this means that changing it isn't an option, therefore wasting your time.] |
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 4
|
Personally, I think sawk should use Poison Jab instead of Toxic cause if Stealth Rocks are up, it would break sturdy and I don't like to switch out most of the time. :O
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Poison Jab is also outclassed by Sawk's new tutor move, Ice Punch. Ice Punch allows Sawk to hit Amoonguss, Vileplume, Exeggutor, Golurk, and a few other Pokemon harder than any of Close Combat / EQ / Stone Edge. |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 115
|
There's a mistake in Sneasel's NU analysis Other Options.
Quote:
If anything, X-Scissor does MUCH less than Bite vs Natu and Swoobat, and only hits Exeggutor harder. |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | |
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 519
Texas
|
Golbat's analysis has a minor error:
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 | |
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 148
|
Minor error but you are missing an s in this sentence on Gardevoir's Weather Support analysis.
http://www.smogon.com/bw/pokemon/gardevoir/nu Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
am i the only one i know?
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
All fixed.
|
|
|
|
|
#43 | ||
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 115
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Hear me Roar
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,669
|
Well, small (read: shallow) movepool does not necessarily imply bad coverage. Something can have perfect coverage with 2 moves, and still have a bad movepool. In Samurotts case, it gets all the coverage it needs with just 2 moves, and can get almost perfect coverage with 3 moves on a special set. However, outside these options it has basically nothing, leading to the shallow movepool comment. I think it makes sense, but it could probably be worded slightly better.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
You don’t have to forgive me. No matter what you decide from now on, I will love you forever.
|
I don't understand why Watchog is a 'joke' Pokemon, sure he isn't too good, but it should at least be given a normal analysis. Watchog could be a decent stall breaker with Super Fang, Hypnosis, Mean Look, Baton Pass, and other helpful moves (I'm at work atm and not looking at the other moves).
__________________
![]() ✓| Back in Action |VM for a GP Stamp | VM for a RU rate| |
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
am i the only one i know?
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
It has generally awful stats and there's no real reason to use it on a semi-competitive team aside from troll factor. It has no strong niche and isn't even worth your time when debating whether or not to even waste a team slot on it. Every Pokemon on the 'joke' list has a usable set or two or even a possible niche all to its own, but there's still no reason anyone should ever use it and that's why we give them joke analyses. I can't think of a single Pokemon outside of that list that I'd rather use Watchog instead of.
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Laying the Groundwork for the Pound Work
![]() ![]()
|
Sap Sipper Defensive Miltank? I'm not sure how many QC members have seen this thing, but it's pretty freaking awesome in the metagame right now (fuck Cincinno / Ammonguss)
This is the set I would use: Miltank w/ Leftovers Ability: Sap Sipper Nature: Impish EVs: 252 HP / 252 Def / 4 Spe -Body Slam -Earthquake / Toxic -Milk Drink -Heal Bell Given the plethora of Ammonguss and Cincinno right now, this is pretty much one of the best counters to both. Tail Slap fails to 2HKO, and if Cincinno goes for Bullet Seed, then it pretty much gives Miltank +5 attack, which means it's going to fuck something over with either Body Slam or Earthquake. I chose Earthquake in the second slot for neutral coverage, but Toxic works too. Thoughts?
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Give me the strength to part this sea
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 534
PM/VM me for an NU rate! Also part of NU QC VM me for a check!
|
I was almost positive that Bullet Seed only gives Sap Sipper users +1 Attack and not +5. Can anyone confirm this?
Other than that I've played against this set quite a bit and its annoying as all hell. Its also suprisingly bulky and tanked hits that I didn't think it could tank. What does everyone else think? Edit: Ah so it is just one. Well even so, a boost is a boost. Even at +1 Miltank still hits decently hard for a bulkier set. |
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Laying the Groundwork for the Pound Work
![]() ![]()
|
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 463
|
Just wondering, but shouldn't Klang be in the NU secion now instead of the NFE section? If it should be in the NFE section, could someone kindly give an explanation why? Thanks.
__________________
I'll be day-to-day for a while, so don't panic if you don't hear from me for a couple days. |
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|