|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 39
In the Earth
|
![]() If I could only get something to burn (Scald)... Name: Physically Defensive Move 1: Drain Punch Move 2: Dragon Tail Move 3: Ice Punch/Crunch Move 4: Substitute/Rest Item: Leftovers Ability: Intimidate/Shed Skin Nature: Impish (+Def, -Spe) EVs: 252 Def / 252 HP / 4 Spe [SET COMMENTS]
[ADDITIONAL COMMENTS]
[SUPERIORITY OF INTIMIDATE]
(Tell me if something is wrong and pass me the link of your calculator) Rejected QC 1/3. Great, maybe I can start saying farewell to it...
__________________
If you want to battle (in-game): Nick: Alex FC: 3096-5945-8543 Or in simulator: Nick: DragonPokeZ Avatar: Steven Stone Last edited by dragonpokeZ; Jun 12th, 2013 at 11:27:41 PM. Reason: Ready to be checked |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,205
|
Why not rest>Substitute with Shed Skin slashed?
Substitute is pretty out of place on a defensive pokemon, and Rest lets it beat status without losing health, rather gaining it Also, what exactly does this beat? A small list would be nice
__________________
ezfsxdgrcfgvh: that looks like ezfsxdgrcfgvh: the most annoying fucking team ezfsxdgrcfgvh: i've ever seen ezfsxdgrcfgvh: and i'm not playing through this shit ezfsxdgrcfgvh forfeited. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 39
In the Earth
|
Quote:
A list of what can it beat... OK, i'll put it in a few minutes
__________________
If you want to battle (in-game): Nick: Alex FC: 3096-5945-8543 Or in simulator: Nick: DragonPokeZ Avatar: Steven Stone |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 371
|
Two things:
Do the 4 extra EVs in speed rather than special defense to outspeed Scrafty that don't invest. Suggest Ice Punch > Crunch to hit Flygon and Gligar very hard. Otherwise the best you can do to them is phaze them out.
__________________
Favorite Uber Pokemon: Arceus Favorite OU Pokemon: Jirachi Favorite UU Pokemon: Rhyperior Favorite RU Pokemon: Emboar Favorite NU Pokemon: Torterra |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 39
In the Earth
|
Quote:
EDIT: Alredy tested, good results.
__________________
If you want to battle (in-game): Nick: Alex FC: 3096-5945-8543 Or in simulator: Nick: DragonPokeZ Avatar: Steven Stone Last edited by dragonpokeZ; Jun 12th, 2013 at 8:37:05 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
i wanna dedicate this song to all the lettuce out there
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,389
|
I'm pretty sure I'll end up rejecting this because I can't think of a single reason to use this set over any other physical wall (hell, you can even use physically defensive Arcanine if you really want Intimidate). Not only does it lack recovery and have a weakness to the most common physical attacking type in UU...
That said, you actually used correct formatting, so I'll give you a chance to tell me what exactly this set has over other physical walls.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 39
In the Earth
|
Quote:
__________________
If you want to battle (in-game): Nick: Alex FC: 3096-5945-8543 Or in simulator: Nick: DragonPokeZ Avatar: Steven Stone |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 254
Santa Fe, Argentina
|
I was gonna say that frankly, although I really like Intimidate, having a Pokemon that consistently loses to Fighting-types as a physical wall seems unappealing. Sure, you tank Heracross's Megahorn, but the only thing you can do back is Dragon Tail, so that's not particularly good. However, I do feel like Intimidate should be slashed or AC'd at least on the onsite Bulk Up set, due to its ability to set up on offensive Lax and (kinda, because it takes a lot from CB EQ) Rhyperior, while at the same time walling some non-setup special attackers. I love the ability, especially on offensive Pokes (that's why I liked the concept of DD Intimidate Scrafty before the ability was released), but having a physical wall that loses to the most common physical attacking type is definitely a turnoff. I haven't discussed this with other QC members, but I'm leaning more towards rejecting this, sorry. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|