|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
she's probably sexting nprtprt
![]() ![]()
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 749
|
http://www.smogon.com/bw/pokemon/Rampardos [SET] name: Special Attacker move 1: Head Smash move 2: Fire Blast move 3: Thunderbolt move 4: Focus Blast item: Life Orb Ability: Sheer Force nature: Rash evs: 4 Atk / 252 SpA / 252 Spe Why this set deserves to be on-site:
Damage Calculation Vs. Multiple Bulky Pokemon
Additional Comments:
Last edited by EBeast; Sep 13th, 2012 at 9:44:56 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Talonflame :D
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,292
Bergenfield
|
I really don't see the need for Rampardos to go special (base 65 SpA) when many of his physical movepool (backed up by its base 165 Atk) also benefits from the Sheer Force boost. With Rock Slide, Zen Headbutt, Superpower, and Thunderbolt a physically oriented Naughty Rampardos can pretty much O-2HKO everything.
EDIT: I meant sheer force, not LO -_-;; edited. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,039
|
The lack of recoil is probably the biggest thing separating this set from other Rampardos sets. Everyone is already aware of Rampardos' wall-breaking abilities, but they usually aren't prepared to take multiple attacks from it. Anyways, this skeleton looks fine; hazards should probably get a bigger mention though because Rampardos absolutely needs to grab those OHKOs. Decent players aren't going to be switching a wall (or any Pokemon) into Rampardos, which makes the 2HKOs less relevant.
QC Approved 1/3
__________________
![]() Last edited by FLCL; Sep 13th, 2012 at 9:33:12 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
she's probably sexting nprtprt
![]() ![]()
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 749
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
underdog of the year
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I was a bit skeptical of this at first glance but it seems to be an okay set, especially given the calcs. I'd still really like to see some logs of it in action, but for now this has my shaky approval (mostly because seeing a special Rampardos set on-site is really questionable - even with Sheer Force, why would you ditch that monstrous base 165 Attack for a pitiful 65 Special Attack?). Unless you're impeccable in your reasoning and explanation of why it works and why it's good, this is going to be questioned.
I'd like to see mentions of partners that appreciate its wallbreaking abilities and particularly those that can bring it in safely, like Swellow, Eelektross, etc. |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
she's probably sexting nprtprt
![]() ![]()
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 749
|
Quote:
If this gets past QC I'll make sure to word and emphasize that as best as I possibly can in the writing alongside the hazard support Furi wanted me to put in as well. [Also this my my 300th post :]) |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
underdog of the year
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Alright, that's fine with me, then.
QC Approved 2/3 |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
I'm a leaf on the wind; watch how i soar
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
this set does have its perks, its a really neat Alomomola and Amoonguss lure(primarily Alomomola). In the writing I really want the downfalls of this set emphasized, and how this set should only be used on specific teams and that most of the time a physical Rampardos would be better. I have seen this set used, and it is not bad and offers a new way to look at the lovable dinosaur <3
QC Approved 3/3 it has enough of a niche, and is useful enough to be on site |
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|