|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#26 |
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 231
Santa Fe, Argentina
|
This is an awesome idea!! The past weeks I've been really busy with school (since we're approaching the finals in my country, and I had better do some work or I'd be extremely overwhelmed later on lol), but I'll be able to contribute much more (especially) starting two weeks from now.
I write as a hobby but also as a lifestyle, and even though English is not my native language I'm completely certain that there's no problem there — it's been at least three years since I first started reading and writing in English outside of classes, so it won't come off as a surprise that I've learnt to think in English too. Moreover, since I was little I've always made sure that what I wrote was grammatically correct, precise and to the point, though I've always struggled with word limits — that's something I need to change in order to do well in college next year, lol. Though I'm probably not the best for the job, I feel like I'd do a good job at writing and giving advices, because let's face it, I've always done that :P I'm also not a great player, but I'm pretty sure I'm not mediocre either. The only thing I'd have to argue is, serial commas hurt my eyes, really. Not only because I never used commas preceding an 'and' or an 'or' when I was growing up, but because they just don't feel right when I use them. Of course, it isn't actually wrong to use them, but it's just an issue I'll never get past. (And come on, the 'We invited the strippers, JFK, and Lenin' is not a situation that'll happen in common writing, lol) |
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
failed abortion
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,214
<@Sarenji> anyway i learned knitting pretty fast <@Sarenji> because im a woman
|
fucking aldaron made my post go away.
anyway im willing to help with writing. i basically only know lc but if needed i can make prose out of someones bullet points lol |
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
:D
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Moderator
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 4,175
|
Hi, as I posted in the IS version, as a champion of conciseness I'd like to both advise and write, as well as help provide some kind of leadership role.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Don't tell me what to do.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,367
|
http://www.smogon.com/bw/metagames/ou
around 140 ou analyses... Since this is purely volunteer work I'm not going to put any particular emphasis on priority / order, but I would like to update overviews for all 140 or so (obviously the "joke" ones should keep that joke tone). People who want to write, post after this post (don't edit your previous post) for what ou overviews you want to reserve; people who want to advise, post what ou overviews you want to advise (you can obviously advise wherever you want but I'd like some assignment organization for efficiency, at least initially). Also specify whether you will be writing, advising, or doing both for each Pokemon you choose.
__________________
beast mode Last edited by Aldaron; Nov 1st, 2012 at 2:02:02 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
King of Conquerors
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,621
Greece
|
The question is, Aldaron, do all of the overviews need updates and remakes? I believe that the first thing that should be done, is to take the people that volunteered to offer advice, and let them have a look in those analysis. Then after they decide which analyses need updates/revising or whatever, post this list here, so that writers can start making reservations, as well as advisers.
EDIT: I guess you have a point...
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Don't tell me what to do.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,367
|
Doesn't matter operationally; if you take 3 Pokemon you like you want to write, and the people assigned to any of those 3 decide the overview doesn't need updating, then just mention that at that step.
No need to waste time on a formalized step that can be done operationally.
__________________
beast mode |
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Kid just rages for a while
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,848
you get sloppy drunk, i stay whiskey neat
|
terrakion is mine, k
aldaron: writing or advising or both??? jabba: both, you ignoramus
__________________
Last edited by JabbaTheGriffin; Nov 1st, 2012 at 2:22:56 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 476
|
So, is this open to anyone, or...?
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Signed and Sealed in Blood I would die for you
![]() ![]() ![]()
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,033
|
Stoked to take Ape.
Overview- Infernape's mixed attacking talents no longer help it out the way they have for the rest of his career. The name of the game in BW2 is all-out offense, which for an attacker generally means do one thing and do it well. On the physical side, offensive teams with only one dedicated physical wall are consistently broken by Rock Gem Terrakion, who boasts far stronger physical attacks and much higher usable bulk when used in sand. On the special side, Infernape isn't very good to start with. Rain teams in particular have pokemon like Tentacruel and Tornadus-T which assure he can not pull a sweep or even leave lasting damage. If you attempt to counteract the weather with your own, you run into the problem of Venusaur, Victini, and Darmanitan collectively outclassing it under sun while returning to the original Terrakion + any top tier special attacker problem in sand and hail. Infernape's past gave him reasons to be used against stall, which has an easier time stacking physical walls to beat Terrakion's sets than his, in particular sun stall teams with Sableye despised him because he can 2HKO anything under the sun without being halted by a burn. However, stall is not a significant part of BW2 and he chances of finding a proper place for Infernape in your team are slim. Last edited by yee; Nov 2nd, 2012 at 2:20:24 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
You Only Stack Once
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,347
|
I'll reserve and write Abomasnow, Metagross and Tyranitar.
Abomasnow Abomasnow's main role on a team is to remove the opponent's weather advantage, and really the only reason to consider using it on your team. Don't bother using Abomasnow to create a hail team, they're far inferior to sand, sun, and rain teams. Abomasnow's stats and movepool lend it to a role of disrupting the opponent's team patterns through an offensive or SubSeed set. Ultimately, Abomasnow doesn't need much team support as it has a singular role in messing with your opponent's team and breaks whatever weather advantage they may have had. Metagross Metagross has a limited amount of decent traits. It can actually take a strong physical move from things like Kyurem-B and hit back, and can run a Specially Defensive set with Pursuit that does well against threats like Latios. Its problem is that it’s basically outclassed by virtually every steel in OU, who deserve that crucial team spot more than Metagross. It’s walled by commonly seen defensive Pokemon such as Ferrothorn and Rotom-W, which is a problem when other steels such as Genesect and Scizor can just U-turn out on the problem. If you’ll ever use Metagross, then it’s because it fills a specific niche that you may need, otherwise stick to its better brothers. Tyranitar You’re using Tyranitar to set up sandstorm, so play to its strengths. Defensive sets with Stealth Rock are done better by Hippowdon, who isn’t threatened by the popular Dugtrio & Genesect combination found on many sun and rain teams and at the same time has reliable recovery. Tyranitar is pretty versatile which allows it to be less one dimensional than Hippowdon and therefore can run Fire Blast to catch Ferrothorn. However, Tyranitar should be running a more offensive set such as Choice Band to get easy kills with Pursuit while at the same time hurting something badly with its STAB moves. Choice Scarf sets have declined in popularity with the arrival of Tornadus-T, but have some merit on teams that include both Hippowdon and Tyranitar.
__________________
(ღ˘⌣˘ღ)
Last edited by Nachos; Nov 10th, 2012 at 6:39:20 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
is going goat
![]()
|
Should we assume that analyses currently in QC/GP aren't up for grabs?
Reserving Magneton since I wrote it, although Idk if it really needs it. Also yee, why not put a few more positives into Infernape's overview? It isn't THAT bad.
__________________
New to Smogon? Afraid to jump into discussion? Introduce yourself!------------------- Fail Cup | Scramble! | RMTs: Blistering Sands (BH) Night Stall (OU) | The Fringe Tournament | ARcTicblast | Other Metagames Premier League | avatar by raikou00, signature art by Zracknel additional credit to Pocket and AccidentalGreed
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
|
The greatest oak was once a little nut that held its ground
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,030
Came by a fork in the road, and went straight
|
I've got Dragonite, Tornadus-T, Gengar, Heatran, Latios, and Latias. I'll advise myself, but others can pitch in too.
Quote:
__________________
![]() Last edited by undisputed; Nov 2nd, 2012 at 1:20:52 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
Don't tell me what to do.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,367
|
Any is good to reserve for writing / advising as long he is a good writer or has some success in a competitive scene.
Quote:
I'm gonna update the OP with the reservations then get to other stuff.
__________________
beast mode |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
:D
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Moderator
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 4,175
|
This makes no sense. Instead of letting someone else write a separate overview to an analysis that is in the writing stages, those analyses should have the overview writer default to the current writer and just have an analyst to go with them. There's no reason to have two different overviews get written and then have to make a subjective assessment on them.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
rip numeros
![]()
|
I'll take Gastrodon, Lilligant, and Smeargle. The last two I wrote so they should be pretty easy to deal with, though Smeargle's needs some definite work.
EDIT: and I must say, I'm very guilty explaining 252/252/4 EV spreads, I'll make sure to stop that.
__________________
C&C Work | 1k RMT | Contribute! | VM for an OU Rate! | gp member: vm/pm for a check | previously pokemon0078 / aka jew-cane
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Buffalo Soldier
![]()
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,106
It could be anywhere most likely could be any frontier any hemisphere
|
I am very willing to write or advise. I'd like to write the overview for Deoxys-D:
Overview: Deoxys-D is endowed with the rare combination of Taunt, Stealth Rock, and Spikes that has allowed it to become the most threatening lead in the OU Metagame despite its non-existent offenses. The relatively few things that can outspeed it frequently cannot KO it before it gets a layer of Spikes and Stealth Rock on the field. Because it sets up hazards with such consistency, Deoxys-D has become the premier supporter for Weather-less Offensive teams, as two layers of hazards are often an even greater advantage than controlling the weather. Like all hazard setters, Deoxys-D must be wary of Rapid Spin, but because it has quite a few strategies that allow it to beat different Rapid Spin users, it may be best to play carefully or wait until it has fainted to spin its hazards away. Another common counter strategy is using a powerful U-turn to get it into range so that something faster can KO it before it gets its second layer up. In spite of these methods, Deoxys-D continues to be a powerful tool for offensive teams to abuse and there are a plethora of sweepers that become simply unmanageable with support from it.
__________________
The simplicity of the ghostlike beast The purity of what he wants And where it goes Always love Always loves you Always loves with, infrared love Last edited by Myzozoa; Nov 1st, 2012 at 9:13:40 PM. Reason: i would hate to be abrupt or cliche |
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Believer, going on a journey...
![]()
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,802
|
Don't use the word 'blessed' or any form of it. It's in too many analyses and I'm tired of reading it. Try 'endowed'.
__________________
(02:53:55) +shrang: sleep is epic (16:14) .No Scrafty in UU.: CBtar? (16:14) .No Scrafty in UU.: that sounds like a not bad set (16:04:25) +Steamroll: nobody likes me @Relados: snowflakes has no sense of humor |
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 231
Santa Fe, Argentina
|
I'd like to reserve and write Slowbro, Crobat and Tornadus, for the moment.
There isn't anything particularly wrong about them, but they're very outdated; Fighting-types aren't half as common in BW2 as they were in BW, while Tornadus should seriously state that Tornadus-T takes away most of its niches except for the Pransker support it can provide with Rain Dance and Tailwind, the fastest Taunt in the game, and a better BU set. If it were needed, I wouldn't be opposed to a revamp either. Btw, SJCrew, 'endowed' is in the same line with the word 'aforementioned' :P |
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Signed and Sealed in Blood I would die for you
![]() ![]() ![]()
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,033
|
I'll reserve to write and advise Tangrowth, Machamp, and Xatu.
EDIT- Sorry alexwolf you get Xatu EDIT2- No Machamp for me, I think the analysis should be removed entirely. Tangrowth- By the grace of Regenerator Tangrowth has become one of the most resilient physical walls in the game, second only to Protect Gliscor after it's Toxic Orb has activated. Tangrowth's home is generally on defensive teams, where it can be used to scout Choice Band attackers by taking the blow and regenerating out to a resist and wear down the other team massively with it's support movepool featuring Sleep Powder, Leech Seed, and Knock Off. It can also be used effectively on balanced teams for the same purpose and to counter top physical threats, being hard for even Breloom to toss aside when asleep. A small special defense investment will allow it to take a Hydro Pump or two as well. It's not going to be fighting for top 5 usage any time soon but it can still be an effective fit in numerous teams. Last edited by yee; Nov 2nd, 2012 at 6:29:48 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Believer, going on a journey...
![]()
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,802
|
I think that's a subjective critique more than anything. However, seeing analyses blend together due to a very similar choice of words is not. You can change it to anything you want. My personal choice was endowed - I learned it through my first job in sales back in high school. It might be pretentious, but I wouldn't know.
We have thesauri.
__________________
(02:53:55) +shrang: sleep is epic (16:14) .No Scrafty in UU.: CBtar? (16:14) .No Scrafty in UU.: that sounds like a not bad set (16:04:25) +Steamroll: nobody likes me @Relados: snowflakes has no sense of humor |
|
|
|
|
#46 | ||
|
Give me the number for 911!
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 541
USA
|
I don't really like the Metagross's or Infernape's proposed overviews to be honest. When I read Infernape's, I felt that it should only be used in the sun and on teams that don't mind a burn, and even then it is still a piece of shit that should never be used ever. For Metagross, it was almost just plain mean - why the heck would you just say "Metagross sucks lol don't use it?" The language was also informal, which didn't help.
Although an overview is made to be honest, it should also be made to make a person see some reason to use it. Let's take Garbodor's first NU analysis... in short it said that Garbodor is a piece of trash, it does nothing other than set up spikes, and there is no reason to prepare for it since anyone who uses it is a stupid player that deserves to lose. It was unpopular after it was uploaded, and the entire article was updated for the sole purpose of changing the wording. If Metagross has an overview that just completely bashes it, that isn't going to make people even read about what Metagross can do... it isn't a completely useless Pokemon, although many people do not really like it. I'll use its current one as a fault system so to speak. Quote:
And then Infernape... Quote:
tl;dr Overview shouldn't be too biased for or against the Pokemon, since if it only points out the pros of a Pokemon, then there is a problem (a lot of current overviews do this), but if it isn't going to point out how a Pokemon can effectively be used in the overview, their interest will shift away from that Pokemon, and everything on that Pokemon's analysis is almost obsolete since nobody will read it. I may not be that knowledgable of how an article should be written but I really don't want an overview to be too negative. This is a great idea, but I don't know if that kind of update is the right approach
__________________
![]() kawakimi: UR DUM kawakimi: N WEIRD Completed Analyses: 16 In Progress: 2 |
||
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
rip numeros
![]()
|
Myzozoa, I should point out that there's really no reason to have italics in your Deoxys-D Overview where you put them. You also might want to conclude with something. You say two counter-strategies and then abruptly end it, which is just, well, abrupt. Also, don't write off its offenses so quickly, there's a set that utilizes them well and STAB Psycho Boost, regardless of the size of its stat, packs a punch, as does super effective Thunder/Hidden Power Fire.
Nachos, your overviews seem like an overview of your opinion on the Pokemon. What you're supposed to do is explain a Pokemon's strengths and weaknesses, why you would use it. Generally, you shouldn't say "only low-ranked players use this Pokemon" in an analysis, in almost all cases Pokemon are used for a reason. You're not giving an overview of what the Pokemon can do/why it should be used, you're giving your opinion. Just a few things I noticed quickly.
__________________
C&C Work | 1k RMT | Contribute! | VM for an OU Rate! | gp member: vm/pm for a check | previously pokemon0078 / aka jew-cane
|
|
|
|
|
#48 | |
|
Buffalo Soldier
![]()
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,106
It could be anywhere most likely could be any frontier any hemisphere
|
Quote:
Edited. I feel like the main point of these overviews should be were a pokemon fits in the metagame. A Darmanitan overview should be explicit in mandating Drought support, it fills a niche. A Rotom-w overview would talk about its amazing versatility that allows it to do so much for so many different team styles. You don't want to be misleading about what a pokemon does. For a pokemon like Politoed, you wouldn't talk about how powerful it is with Choice Specs, you'd talk about how much Drizzle helps out Tentacruel, Ferrothorn, Tornadus-t, etc. Overviews should be realistic about pokemon that persist in OU despite many drawbacks. I think that if someone were to write a Forretress overview it would talk about how it struggles to Rapid Spin and Spike in the current metagame, despite having a lot of positives. It would get a mixed review. Infernape is essentially very hard to use, and the overview shouldn't shirk that and act like it's really good when it's actually underwhelming.
__________________
The simplicity of the ghostlike beast The purity of what he wants And where it goes Always love Always loves you Always loves with, infrared love Last edited by Myzozoa; Nov 1st, 2012 at 11:30:19 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
King of Conquerors
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,621
Greece
|
@yee
I have already reserved Xatu, so i will be writing its overview. But any advising is helpful! Also please people try to be more serious. For example Nachos i get that Metagross is terrible, but you know that the overview you wrote is not formal, and is not even an overview. It is a paragraph of hate. Of 'course mention why it isn't good, but also mention his few niche roles. Mention that he is a decent Lati@s, Gengar, etc pursuit trapper, that can use SR, just as Tyranitar, but for teams that don't want to use Tyranitar. Those kind of stuff. We are not writing overviews for tourneys, we are writing overviews for any kind of people that would want to use Metagross, so the language and the content should be more appropriate.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 476
|
I'd like to reserve Hydreigon, if that's at all possible, please.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|