|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5
|
[Overview]
[SET] Trait: Sheer ForceDarmanitan (M) @ Salac Berry EVs: 4 HP / 252 Atk / 252 Spd Adamant Nature (+Atk, -SAtk) / Jolly Nature (+Spd, -SAtk) - Substitute - Belly Drum - Fire Punch - Earthquake\Rock Slide\Superpower [SET COMMENTS]
[ADDITIONAL COMMENTS]
[Other Options]
[Checks and Counters]
Last edited by kokoloko; Apr 16th, 2013 at 10:52:01 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Quiet Thunder God
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,520
Izanagi
|
It's incredibly difficult to pull this set off in an actual match. You need to prevent hazards from going up, find the time to set up Darmanitan, while keeping it healthy. That's honestly not an easy thing to do, especially if your opponent puts you in a position where you're forced to bring out Darmanitan early. The regular LO Darmanitan set already has overkill offense + u-turn to switch out of Pokemon that can check it, and Scarf Darmanitan can sweep teams with way less effort. This set doesn't beat anything the regular set LO set doesn't, and priority moves prevent you from ever sweeping. so why exactly should we approve it?
Quote:
I strongly suggest that you spend some time playing on the UU ladder on either simulator, lurking on the forums, and checking out several C&C threads to get a better understanding of BW UU. Also, keep in mind that your format still isn't up to par (you don't need an Other Options, and your paragraphs are thin). EDIT: Taking back my rejection for now
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5
|
I already pointed out this set should be used after scouting priorities, etc, thats why i mentioned it should be used at the right time.
i understand scarf set has more imediate power, i used scarf much more often than this set... cause this set i just had it in mind... and it has more sweeping capability than the scarf one. It is true i dont play so often after 2nd or 3rd gen.. but tried this set and worked perfect with Whimmiscot on 13 or 14 matches of 15 i tried. Obviously its gimmick, and i think u were a bit rigorous. And thin lines? i pointed everything important about this set, whatelse should i write? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
04/01/13 never forget
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 615
Edmonton, AB
|
QC Denied 1/3
This is another example of a gimmick set that may seem to work on paper, but it's god awful in practice. Being nearly impossible to safely set up, this Darmanitan set isn't viable enough to be considered "good" enough to be put on site. Sure, it may have some good surprise factor and the ability to OHKO the entire tier (depending on the move you chose), but even at +1 Speed, it's still outsped by many common Pokemon, specifically Scarf Flygon, Scarf Raikou, Scarf Mienshao, and can only tie things like Scarf Heracross and opposing Scarf Darmanitan. Good effort, but as PK Gaming said, try laddering a bit more on the UU ladder to get a feel for what really works and what doesn't.
__________________
Ever wanted to contribute to Smogon? Visit the Contributions and Corrections forum! |Work | UU Titans project | UU Research Week Mk.III #5 | |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
winter is coming
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,300
|
Lol it's funny because I've actually used BD Darmanitan in the past... It was for some monotype tournament but still. It wasn't nearly as hard to pull off as you'd think. Mainly because Darmanitan excels at forcing switches, so you almost always get a free Drum off. The thing is, I used it with Endure and Salac Berry, not Substitute. If you BD on the switch you can either kill anything slower (making it a great lure for Slowbro and Rhyperior) or activate your Salac Berry at will. Endure also blocks random Fake Outs, which is nice.
I'm actually going to do some testing on it, so I'd like to hold off on rejections for now.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Laying the Groundwork for the Pound Work
![]() ![]()
|
Maybe an OO mention on the analysis, but I don't think this is worthy of being a legitimate set.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 71
Ontario, Canada
|
While the QC members are testing the set, you may want to get rid of unnecessary sections in your Analysis Skeleton. Click here to see how the analysis should look.
__________________
Currently working on a UU Sigilyph analysis Also an Amchecker. Congratulations, you're officially done reading my signature. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|