|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#126 |
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 43
|
My first ever post on Smogon!
I've been lurking for almost a year, and voted on each step of Syclant's creation. I definetly belive that we should once again create a new Pokemon, for the reasons already stated. I think Nintendo can do what it wishes with their own Pokemon, and we should limit our creations to our own ideas. |
|
|
|
|
#127 |
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 597
Calgary, Alberta
|
Evolution of an old poke
Either Banette, Tentaghoul, or Farfetch'd evo.
__________________
FC: 3394 1848 0620 Come see me and Superstar's Lovely Bunch of Coconuts Also for participants of the smogon breeding program month 3 if you haven't picked up my glaceon stop my thread and we can make the exchange. |
|
|
|
|
#128 |
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 747
Avatar by Yamipoli
|
NEUTRAL
Sorry, but I don't really have an opinion on this. I can't wait to see how this one turns out though... |
|
|
|
|
#129 |
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,084
|
Skarmory evo
|
|
|
|
|
#130 |
|
Jigen Makkoto
![]()
Moderator
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,843
Massachusetts
|
First, Tentacruel has no basis evolving into part Ghost. Prevo was Water/Poison, current is Water/Poison. Moreover, why would we want to take away the sexy Toxic Spikes absorbing.
Sure, it removes a Ground and Psychic weakness for a Normal and Fighting immunity, but it also makes it weak to Grass, Ghost, and Dark attacks. (The rest of the chart is basically unchanged.) Why would we want to make Tenta Pursuit bait and remove its most usefull functions just to say "hai Gamefreak we perverted your concept thats been in every gen since RBY basically unchanged!" If there is one though, I'm pulling for Bannette. Farfetch'd is cool and all, but we already have 6 normal/flyers. Our Pure Ghosts are in short supply. |
|
|
|
|
#131 |
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,679
|
Hm...
I'm thinking this over. As much fun as a new evo would be, it seems it is very limited in what we would do. Farfetch'd = Fight/Flying, Bannette = Ghost/Fighting. See DougJustDoug, CyzirVisheen (goat Pokemon ftw), and Lord_Sunday for reasoning. Hm... who do those three sound like? Yeah, basically, this has two more days before I count the votes. If there is not a significant lead on creating an evo, I am going to go with entire new Pokemon. Evo's have been done before, albeit poorly, but the concepts are ingrained into the community's head. Basically. freedom > restriction. |
|
|
|
|
#132 |
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,991
|
Zangoose or Absol Evo! HELL Yeah
|
|
|
|
|
#133 |
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,806
The sunny streets of Santa Barbara
|
Actually, with Gorm's arguments for a new pokemon, I'm changing my vote.
|
|
|
|
|
#134 |
|
RIDE OR DIE MOTHERFUCKERS ᕦ(ò_óˇ)ᕤ ᕦ(ò_óˇ)ᕤ ᕦ(ò_óˇ)ᕤ
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,242
|
hmmm close poll... im going to go with a new pokemon for the simple reason that a. we dont know what gamefreak already has planned for future gens and b. i think that we would be much more limited on what we could choose if we went with an evo. fire/water ftw!
|
|
|
|
|
#135 |
|
Jigen Makkoto
![]()
Moderator
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,843
Massachusetts
|
I'm just going to reiterate what I said before:
If we're going to make a new pokemon evolution, we should try and keep it to the design of the original, just make it better. All I've seen so far is "Lets evolve something and slap on a fighting type YAHYAHYAH!" Farfetch'd is a leek carrying bird. All of a sudden it becomes part fighting because what, we want it to decimate with Close Combat and Brave Bird all that dared mock it before? Are we just going to ignore the fact it basically has balanced stats and just run with 72/125/65/63/72/100 in order to faciliatate our dreams of sweeping Farfetch'd? Neither Farfetch'd nor Banette even get Fighting attacks. At least Gardevior gets Focus Blast (and Stone Evolution under unique circumstances doesn't hurt Gallade's sense of purpose.) All I'm saying is we should be respectful of the original design, whether we like it's effectiveness or not. Otherwise we're just bringing in arbitrary crap for the sake of doing so under the pretense "its not really arbitrary cause we're working off an existing model, see? There are 4 lights." |
|
|
|
|
#136 |
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 40
|
Farfetch'd would be part Fighting because he's a friggin' samurai and there isn't a Poke of that type combo yet.
__________________
http://rockothetaco.deviantart.com/ |
|
|
|
|
#137 | |
|
Jigen Makkoto
![]()
Moderator
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,843
Massachusetts
|
Quote:
Rampardos is a dinosaur it should be part Fighting! Scyther is a ninja it should be part Fighting! Sunflora has leafy arms it should be part Fighting! Ambipom is a monkey with huge fists it should be part Fighting! |
|
|
|
|
|
#138 |
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 17
Michigan
|
New Pokemon
that way it would be more awesome. Ice/Dragon or Ghost/Grass would be sweet Last edited by Poliwaggle; Jan 19th, 2008 at 1:40:39 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#139 | |
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 512
|
Quote:
__________________
Hai?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#140 |
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 100
inside of a dorito bag
|
New Pokemon
Hopefully with something like what was mentioned in the first page, an ability that removes any spikes from the fiield when coming in :o! |
|
|
|
|
#141 | |
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,806
The sunny streets of Santa Barbara
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#142 |
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,679
|
Deck Knight was a little drastic. It's hard not to see Fighting on Farfetch'd. I think his logic applies to Bannete more. How many of you want a Pure Ghost evo of Bannete? No one. Most of you just want STAB on Fighting/Ghost and see him as the best way to accomplish this. A new Pokemon could have a better design for it. Honestly, how does Ghost Doll say Fighting besides the fact that it can exploit it.
|
|
|
|
|
#143 |
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,498
where have i been
|
Yeah, but why does Banette have to be Ghost/Fighting?
Where the heck did fighting come from? |
|
|
|
|
#144 |
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,679
|
It doesn't, but that's what most people are suggesting.
|
|
|
|
|
#145 |
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,498
where have i been
|
If people want ghost/fighting, they should vote for a new poke; banette does not fit with fighting whatsoever.
|
|
|
|
|
#146 |
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,045
Vancouver, Canada
|
Evolution of an existing pokemon
I think jynx deserves an evo, it's the last of the electabuzz/magmar/jynx trio, and last gen it got left behind. Of course we just did an ice pokemon, so really >.> Stupid Syclant <.<
__________________
Hadwick hardly had a happy holiday |
|
|
|
|
#147 |
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,180
|
For reals. More awesome bugs.
|
|
|
|
|
#148 | |
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 512
|
Quote:
@ Hyra: I don't even want Baenette to evolve. It doesn't make any sense to even go into a fighiting type. MY Fakemon makes a crap load of sense though. And yes, Im bringing it up again. Because if there is a chance for a New Evo, I want mine to be heard. Last time was way too early and now is the perfect chance. Steel/Normal, Munchlax evo. Sweeper/Bellydrummer - esque/Min-wall. Fits well with what I pictured it to be. If you guys still reject that, then fine. But give it a chance. i understand I gave too much info, and I mistakenly gave that thinking with more info, you wouild be more prone to accepting it. I put a load of thought into it and I want it to at least be thought about. I'll give up on it if you want me too. Im just saying, other than the Farfethc'd thing, it works well with what Nintendo already created. I just want to say one more thing: If it is accepted, I want to keep the idea, keep the move "Bell Toll" so it would fit with what I thought it would be. If you need inspiration to my idea, I was playing around on Photoshop made a bad image of what I thought it would look like. I can't upload it today since im leaving soon, but I can tomorrow.
__________________
Hai?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#149 |
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,679
|
Hm... Wow... We really messed up with "our ideas"
Farfetch'd learns no Fighting moves. It learns Night Slash and Poison Jab instead. While conceptually Fight/Flying might work, Farfetch'd's learn set does not support it. Banette also lacks Fighting moves. I see it being Ghost/Dark, Ghost/Electric, or Ghost/Fire before Ghost/Fighting. Dunsparce at least learns Shadow Ball. But it has more Rock moves than Ghost moves. I see Normal/Rock or Rock/Ghost before Normal/Ghost. Hah, Tentaghoul. Tentacruel is OU for one. Two, it has been Water/Poison for ever. This Pokemon is the least deserving of an evo. Also, we are not doing pre-evos. We are designing competitive Pokemon. Not a genderless cow. @ GengarCrysis: No offense, but that was one of the worst Fakemon idea's I have ever seen. |
|
|
|
|
#150 | |
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 763
|
NEW POKEMON
Why should we limit ourselves? It's not as if by evolving Bannette we're making it more usable. In fact, by evolving something in a lower tier than OU, we can cause elitist UU metagamers to complain about "OU-lite". We would be exiling a pokemon to true limbo while replacing it with something that is essentially new. Because of Weavile, Sneasel is useless, even in UU. The same goes for Gligar, Tangela, and a host of others whose move up to OU left some in the UU metagame bereft of pokemon they enjoyed using. Smogon surely has enough creativity to create a new pokemon without having to rely on old designs. I would rather leave old pokemon to Nintendo to evolve on their own.
__________________
90% of posts are empty and devoid of meaning. Quote:
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| evo, revenankh |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|